作者:
James C. Scott 出版社: Yale University Press 副标题: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance 出版年: 1987-9-10 页数: 392 定价: USD 24.00 装帧: Paperback ISBN: 9780300036411
Weapons of the Weak is an ethnography by James C. Scott that studies the effects of the Green Revolution in rural Malaysia. One of the main objectives of the study is to make an argument that the Marxian and Gramscian ideas of false consciousness and hegemony are incorrect. He develops this conclusion throughout the book, through the different scenarios and characters that come...
Weapons of the Weak is an ethnography by James C. Scott that studies the effects of the Green Revolution in rural Malaysia. One of the main objectives of the study is to make an argument that the Marxian and Gramscian ideas of false consciousness and hegemony are incorrect. He develops this conclusion throughout the book, through the different scenarios and characters that come up during his time of fieldwork in the village. This publication, based on 2 years of fieldwork (1978-1980), focuses on the local class relations in a small rice farming community of 70 households in the main paddy-growing area of Kedah in Malaysia. Introduction of the Green Revolution in 1976 eliminated 2/3 of the wage-earning opportunities for smallholders and landless laborers. The main ensuing class struggle is analyzed being the ideological struggle in the village and the practice of resistance itself consisting of: foot-dragging, dissimulation, desertion, false compliance, pilfering, feigned ignorance and sabotage acts. Rich and poor are engaged in an unremitting if silent struggle to define changes in land tenure, mechanization and employment to advance their own interests, and to use values that they share to control the distribution of status, land, work and grain.
作者简介
· · · · · ·
James C. Scott is the Sterling Professor of Political Science, professor of anthropology, and codirector of the Agrariane, professor of anthropology, and codirector of the Agrarian Studies Program at Yale University. His books include "Seei Studies Program at Yale University. His books include "Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Cong Like a State: How...
James C. Scott is the Sterling Professor of Political Science, professor of anthropology, and codirector of the Agrariane, professor of anthropology, and codirector of the Agrarian Studies Program at Yale University. His books include "Seei Studies Program at Yale University. His books include "Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Cong Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed"; "Domination and the Arts of Resistancendition Have Failed"; "Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts"; and most recently, "The Art of Not Be: Hidden Transcripts"; and most recently, "The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia.ing Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia." He is a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Science" He is a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and a mediocre part-time farmer and beekeeper. s and a mediocre part-time farmer and beekeeper.
很粗略的过了中文版，因为距离课堂讨论的DDL只有一天了。英文版大致翻了下，好写response。好在对于斯科特在中国的衍生品还算熟悉，总算能交差。不过这次的讨论主要围绕政治学学者如何用semiotic practice的方法，如何理解文化这种dialetical relationship between practices and systems of significations, 以及民族志调...很粗略的过了中文版，因为距离课堂讨论的DDL只有一天了。英文版大致翻了下，好写response。好在对于斯科特在中国的衍生品还算熟悉，总算能交差。不过这次的讨论主要围绕政治学学者如何用semiotic practice的方法，如何理解文化这种dialetical relationship between practices and systems of significations, 以及民族志调查与社会科学所要求的parsimonious, general的理论之间的对接。趁着写response, 又重新梳理了下近几年中外对于土改、集体化的口述史研究，感觉清晰了一点。(展开)
"euphemization of economic power," critics of hegemony, resistance/conflicts within hegemony, inevitability does not equal legitimacy, interesting talk on the concentration camp (homo sacer?), hegemon..."euphemization of economic power," critics of hegemony, resistance/conflicts within hegemony, inevitability does not equal legitimacy, interesting talk on the concentration camp (homo sacer?), hegemony gives raw materials of resistance, utopia as negation of the present, ANARCHISM not liberalism (ambition/vaguard party is not required), etc.(展开)
moral economy的延续 archival vs field work. a detailed study of local class relations; simi: peasants rebel/everyday form of resist, not for big structural changes, but for a claim of right to the subsis...moral economy的延续 archival vs field work. a detailed study of local class relations; simi: peasants rebel/everyday form of resist, not for big structural changes, but for a claim of right to the subsistence, notion of eco justice/ self-esteem & recognition in the community. backward.exog: marketi./green revol. soci-move; -->hidden trans; <->hegemony(展开)
“Everyday forms of peasant resistance”这个解释真的有意义吗？我的质疑来自三个方面。第一，农民的Weapons of the Weak到底与其他社会生活中出现的各种各样的类似现象有着什么样的区别？还是说，作者只想描述一种现象，而并非想要提出一种有边界的理论。第二，Weapons of the Weak这个现象真的足够政治吗？或者说，这个现象在政治上有意义吗？把它...“Everyday forms of peasant resistance”这个解释真的有意义吗？我的质疑来自三个方面。第一，农民的Weapons of the Weak到底与其他社会生活中出现的各种各样的类似现象有着什么样的区别？还是说，作者只想描述一种现象，而并非想要提出一种有边界的理论。第二，Weapons of the Weak这个现象真的足够政治吗？或者说，这个现象在政治上有意义吗？把它们解释成为阶级的反抗，这似乎才是真地强加给了农民一种虚假意识。第三，弱者真的拥有武器吗？这个武器对统治者产生的威胁是真的具有挑战性吗？Weapons of the Weak能够产生可置信的威胁吗？(展开)
睡光光
译林出版社2007版
Pete Seeger
译林出版社2007版
Oz.
译林出版社2007版
陆大荣
译林出版社2007版
Daneestone
译林出版社2007版
花儿花
译林出版社2007版
夏天
译林出版社2007版
洣歌
译林出版社2007版
叶曳
译林出版社2007版
1 有用 nightdreamer 2015-04-19 19:29:50
画风马上就变了。应该算是采用民族志法研究抗争的早期学者。
0 有用 Héloïse 2014-04-19 09:39:07
对社会运动的一种扩大性解读，不拘泥于传统理论概念，有趣。
0 有用 Apathetic Frog 2021-08-16 06:16:45
航航说的「如果政治学还有点意思的话，那就是那时候这本书了」，也的确很有意思 ，尤其是对意图的强调：做个不负责任的类比，就像为了探索 universal human nature，跑到 latent space 去做民族志，最后还把人当人，没当数据。第六章对农民词汇（tolong, makan 等）的分析以及后面对「抵抗」一词的定义与操作，比语义学好玩多了。前面介绍背景的章节倒是挺啰嗦的，充当了好几... 航航说的「如果政治学还有点意思的话，那就是那时候这本书了」，也的确很有意思 ，尤其是对意图的强调：做个不负责任的类比，就像为了探索 universal human nature，跑到 latent space 去做民族志，最后还把人当人，没当数据。第六章对农民词汇（tolong, makan 等）的分析以及后面对「抵抗」一词的定义与操作，比语义学好玩多了。前面介绍背景的章节倒是挺啰嗦的，充当了好几天的催眠书顺带教会了我如何假 clarity 之名凑字数。 (展开)
0 有用 [已注销] 2016-04-28 15:05:27
很粗略的过了中文版，因为距离课堂讨论的DDL只有一天了。英文版大致翻了下，好写response。好在对于斯科特在中国的衍生品还算熟悉，总算能交差。不过这次的讨论主要围绕政治学学者如何用semiotic practice的方法，如何理解文化这种dialetical relationship between practices and systems of significations, 以及民族志调... 很粗略的过了中文版，因为距离课堂讨论的DDL只有一天了。英文版大致翻了下，好写response。好在对于斯科特在中国的衍生品还算熟悉，总算能交差。不过这次的讨论主要围绕政治学学者如何用semiotic practice的方法，如何理解文化这种dialetical relationship between practices and systems of significations, 以及民族志调查与社会科学所要求的parsimonious, general的理论之间的对接。趁着写response, 又重新梳理了下近几年中外对于土改、集体化的口述史研究，感觉清晰了一点。 (展开)
0 有用 化城 2012-04-17 07:35:55
"euphemization of economic power," critics of hegemony, resistance/conflicts within hegemony, inevitability does not equal legitimacy, interesting talk on the concentration camp (homo sacer?), hegemon... "euphemization of economic power," critics of hegemony, resistance/conflicts within hegemony, inevitability does not equal legitimacy, interesting talk on the concentration camp (homo sacer?), hegemony gives raw materials of resistance, utopia as negation of the present, ANARCHISM not liberalism (ambition/vaguard party is not required), etc. (展开)
0 有用 Apathetic Frog 2021-08-16 06:16:45
航航说的「如果政治学还有点意思的话，那就是那时候这本书了」，也的确很有意思 ，尤其是对意图的强调：做个不负责任的类比，就像为了探索 universal human nature，跑到 latent space 去做民族志，最后还把人当人，没当数据。第六章对农民词汇（tolong, makan 等）的分析以及后面对「抵抗」一词的定义与操作，比语义学好玩多了。前面介绍背景的章节倒是挺啰嗦的，充当了好几... 航航说的「如果政治学还有点意思的话，那就是那时候这本书了」，也的确很有意思 ，尤其是对意图的强调：做个不负责任的类比，就像为了探索 universal human nature，跑到 latent space 去做民族志，最后还把人当人，没当数据。第六章对农民词汇（tolong, makan 等）的分析以及后面对「抵抗」一词的定义与操作，比语义学好玩多了。前面介绍背景的章节倒是挺啰嗦的，充当了好几天的催眠书顺带教会了我如何假 clarity 之名凑字数。 (展开)
0 有用 ca7thy 2020-05-19 14:25:28
moral economy的延续 archival vs field work. a detailed study of local class relations; simi: peasants rebel/everyday form of resist, not for big structural changes, but for a claim of right to the subsis... moral economy的延续 archival vs field work. a detailed study of local class relations; simi: peasants rebel/everyday form of resist, not for big structural changes, but for a claim of right to the subsistence, notion of eco justice/ self-esteem & recognition in the community. backward.exog: marketi./green revol. soci-move; -->hidden trans; <->hegemony (展开)
0 有用 美孚新村圆鸿渐 2020-03-31 17:43:47
“Everyday forms of peasant resistance”这个解释真的有意义吗？我的质疑来自三个方面。第一，农民的Weapons of the Weak到底与其他社会生活中出现的各种各样的类似现象有着什么样的区别？还是说，作者只想描述一种现象，而并非想要提出一种有边界的理论。第二，Weapons of the Weak这个现象真的足够政治吗？或者说，这个现象在政治上有意义吗？把它... “Everyday forms of peasant resistance”这个解释真的有意义吗？我的质疑来自三个方面。第一，农民的Weapons of the Weak到底与其他社会生活中出现的各种各样的类似现象有着什么样的区别？还是说，作者只想描述一种现象，而并非想要提出一种有边界的理论。第二，Weapons of the Weak这个现象真的足够政治吗？或者说，这个现象在政治上有意义吗？把它们解释成为阶级的反抗，这似乎才是真地强加给了农民一种虚假意识。第三，弱者真的拥有武器吗？这个武器对统治者产生的威胁是真的具有挑战性吗？Weapons of the Weak能够产生可置信的威胁吗？ (展开)
0 有用 司马懿（魏臣版 2020-02-24 16:57:42
每次看这本书我的脑子像是被台风扫荡过一样只剩下两个内容：“James Scott文笔真好”、“哇在马来西亚乡下待三年，好酷哟～”【主要是everyday resistance实在太trivial了，虽然是个有趣的课题，但讲真没啥好研究的】
8 有用 高端韭菜kimi 2017-08-09 11:56:17
小时候，你爹妈教训你，你不敢正面冲突，于是不吃饭。这就叫弱者的武器（屁用没有）