出版社: Basic Books
副标题: A Defense Of Pluralism And Equality
出版年: 1984-9-25
页数: 364
定价: USD 26.00
装帧: Paperback
ISBN: 9780465081899
内容简介 · · · · · ·
Spheres of Justice, with the subtitle "In defence of pluralism and equality", is the title of a book written by Michael Walzer.
In it, Walzer argues in favour of an idea he calls "complex equality", and against the view that goods with different meaning and content can be lumped together into the larger category of primary goods, as is advocated by John Rawls, in his A Theory o...
Spheres of Justice, with the subtitle "In defence of pluralism and equality", is the title of a book written by Michael Walzer.
In it, Walzer argues in favour of an idea he calls "complex equality", and against the view that goods with different meaning and content can be lumped together into the larger category of primary goods, as is advocated by John Rawls, in his A Theory of Justice from 1971. The book might be considered an attempt, from a liberal starting point, to bridge some of the disagreements between liberals and communitarians in political philosophy.
作者简介 · · · · · ·
Michael Walzer (3 March 1935) is one of America's leading political philosophers. He is a professor emeritus at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey and editor of Dissent, a left-wing quarterly of politics and culture. He has written on a wide range of topics, including just and unjust wars, nationalism, ethnicity, economic justice, social criticism, radica...
Michael Walzer (3 March 1935) is one of America's leading political philosophers. He is a professor emeritus at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey and editor of Dissent, a left-wing quarterly of politics and culture. He has written on a wide range of topics, including just and unjust wars, nationalism, ethnicity, economic justice, social criticism, radicalism, tolerance, and political obligation. He is also a contributing editor to The New Republic and a member of the editorial board of Philosophy & Public Affairs. To date he has written 27 books and has published over 300 articles, essays, and book reviews. He is a member of several philosophical organizations including the American Philosophical Society.
Michael is the older brother of historian Judith Walzer Leavitt.
Walzer is usually identified as one of the leading proponents of the "Communitarian" position in political theory, along with Alasdair MacIntyre and Michael Sandel. Like Sandel and MacIntyre, Walzer is not completely comfortable with this label. He has, however, long argued that political theory must be grounded in the traditions and culture of particular societies and opposed what he sees to be the excessive abstraction of political philosophy. His most important intellectual contributions include a revitalization of just war theory that insists on the importance of ethics in wartime while eschewing pacifism; the theory of "complex equality," which holds that the metric of just equality is not some single material or moral good, but rather that egalitarian justice demands that each good be distributed according to its social meaning, and that no good (like money or political power) be allowed to dominate or distort the distribution of goods in other spheres; and an argument that justice is primarily a moral standard within particular nations and societies, not one that can be developed in a universalized abstraction.
In April 2008, Walzer received the prestigious Spinoza Lens, a bi-annual prize for ethics in The Netherlands.
喜欢读"Spheres Of Justice"的人也喜欢 · · · · · ·
Spheres Of Justice的书评 · · · · · · ( 全部 8 条 )


【转】王凤才:从“作为公平的正义”到多元正义——罗尔斯、沃尔泽的正义理论评析

正义何为?——基于复合平等的一种理论

龚群:沃尔泽的多元复合平等观——兼论与罗尔斯的简单平等观之比较

多元主义视野下的公正与平等

> 更多书评 8篇
论坛 · · · · · ·
在这本书的论坛里发言这本书的其他版本 · · · · · · ( 全部6 )
-
译林出版社 (2022)暂无评分 9人读过
-
译林出版社 (2002)8.4分 115人读过
-
译林出版社 (2009)8.3分 24人读过
-
译林出版社 (2002)暂无评分 5人读过
以下书单推荐 · · · · · · ( 全部 )
- Comp Exam in Political Philosophy, IUB (Nomis Owl)
- 我的原版书 (新月)
- 英文原版 (午夜书生)
- Most Cited Works in Political Theory ([已注销])
- Foundations of political science (Lycurgus)
谁读这本书? · · · · · ·
二手市场
· · · · · ·
- 在豆瓣转让 有97人想读,手里有一本闲着?
订阅关于Spheres Of Justice的评论:
feed: rss 2.0
1 有用 西西弗斯的石头 2016-12-08 13:39:36
只看了前面两章,作者的复杂正义理论强调social goods应该被分为不同的类别;而不同类别的social goods理应区别对待,包括它们如何分配,如何决定,谁来决定。罗尔斯的正义理论似乎没有特别说明social goods的不同属性问题。
1 有用 暮色·朝阳 2016-02-24 11:37:33
对正义论的反驳和补充
0 有用 我们梦呓者 2024-11-01 02:52:40 美国
沃尔泽没有说清楚spheres of justice到底是基于不同共同体(家庭,国家,宗教)的sphere还是基于不同的social goods(金钱,教育,权力……) 作者字里行间透露出社群主义的倾向,只有哪些被特定社群视作“公共福利”的东西才能被政治权威分配,问题在于如果个人的偏好与社群文化有抵牾呢? 进一步的,作者似乎在运用原则时又诉诸于一些并不局限于社群特定文化的原则,比如抽象的平等原则和... 沃尔泽没有说清楚spheres of justice到底是基于不同共同体(家庭,国家,宗教)的sphere还是基于不同的social goods(金钱,教育,权力……) 作者字里行间透露出社群主义的倾向,只有哪些被特定社群视作“公共福利”的东西才能被政治权威分配,问题在于如果个人的偏好与社群文化有抵牾呢? 进一步的,作者似乎在运用原则时又诉诸于一些并不局限于社群特定文化的原则,比如抽象的平等原则和需求原则。 另一个问题是,似乎我们认为政治权威的sphere区别于其它sphere的特点就在于政治权威能够协调公民社会的其它sphere,我们指望政治领域能够协调统筹其它领域,但对于沃尔泽而言这能否避免成为一种宰制? (展开)
4 有用 Lincredible#0 2020-02-25 15:14:43
一本很有趣也很奇怪的作品,一定是当代经典,因为1.具体写出了罗尔斯没能谈及的不同领域的正义分配原则;2.领域的划分虽然有的时候显得有些随机,但复杂平等和反支配与垄断的思路在框架上非常清晰;3.有非常具体的论证,加上不知道从哪儿来的一堆例子。奇怪的部分在于:1.整本书其实都没讨论结社的问题,而这似乎恰好是多元主义的核心议题,而结社的一个目的似乎就是跨越正义的领域表达诉求或者修订领域的边界;2.试图讨... 一本很有趣也很奇怪的作品,一定是当代经典,因为1.具体写出了罗尔斯没能谈及的不同领域的正义分配原则;2.领域的划分虽然有的时候显得有些随机,但复杂平等和反支配与垄断的思路在框架上非常清晰;3.有非常具体的论证,加上不知道从哪儿来的一堆例子。奇怪的部分在于:1.整本书其实都没讨论结社的问题,而这似乎恰好是多元主义的核心议题,而结社的一个目的似乎就是跨越正义的领域表达诉求或者修订领域的边界;2.试图讨论正义问题,但其实缺乏一个明确的正义定义,因此使得领域的划分显得有些随意——为什么空闲时间是个正义而不是善的问题?;3.论证的方式试图给正反两方都足够的意见和处理,往往到最后变得结论不明确。沃尔泽追求流畅的文风的代价是很多论证因为过于依赖直觉而并不能称其为论证,不过结论而言,我似乎还和他蛮契合。 (展开)
1 有用 大清国的猫托邦 2012-06-11 11:54:11
simple equality vs complex equality; dominance vs monopoly @2012-06-11 11:54:11