Prologue ix
Conventions xix
Acknowledgments xxiii
PART I. FROM THE FIRST PHILOLOGISTS TO 1800 1
1. "Cloistered Bookworms, Quarreling Endlessly in the Muses' Bird-Cage": From Greek Antiquity to circa 1400 3
2. "A Complete Mastery of Antiquity": Renaissance, Reformation, and Beyond 33
· · · · · ·
(
更多)
Prologue ix
Conventions xix
Acknowledgments xxiii
PART I. FROM THE FIRST PHILOLOGISTS TO 1800 1
1. "Cloistered Bookworms, Quarreling Endlessly in the Muses' Bird-Cage": From Greek Antiquity to circa 1400 3
2. "A Complete Mastery of Antiquity": Renaissance, Reformation, and Beyond 33
3. "A Voracious and Undistinguishing Appetite": British Philology to the Mid-Eighteenth Century 65
4. "Deep Erudition Ingeniously Applied": Revolutions of the Later Eighteenth Century 91
PART II. ON THE BRINK OF THE MODERN HUMANITIES, 1800 TO THE MID-NINETEENTH CENTURY 123
5. "The Similarity of Structure Which Pervades All Languages": From Philology to Linguistics, 1800-1850 125
6. "Genuinely National Poetry and Prose": Literary Philology and Literary Studies, 1800-1860 147
7. "An Epoch in Historical Science": The Civilized Past, 1800-1850 167
I. Altertumswissenschaft and Classical Studies 168
II. Archaeology 184
III. History 197
8. "Grammatical and Exegetical Tact": Biblical Philology and Its Others, 1800-1860 210
PART III. THE MODERN HUMANITIES IN THE MODERN UNIVERSITY, THE MID-NINETEENTH TO THE TWENTIETH CENTURY 231
9. "This Newly Opened Mine of Scientific Inquiry": Between History and Nature: Linguistics after 1850 236
10. "Painstaking Research Quite Equal to Mathematical Physics": Literature, 1860-1920 254
11. "No Tendency toward Dilettantism": The Civilized Past after 1850 274
I. 'Classics' Becomes a Discipline 275
II. History 299
III. Art History 310
12. "The Field Naturalists of Human Nature": Anthropology Congeals into a Discipline, 1840-1910 328
13. "The Highest and Most Engaging of the Manifestations of Human Nature": Biblical Philology and the Rise of Religious Studies after 1860 357
I. The Fate of Biblical Philology 357
II. The Rise of Comparative Religious Studies 368
Epilogue 381
Notes 387
Works Cited 453
Index 509
· · · · · · (
收起)
0 有用 小红帽 2014-10-25 10:32:52
more like a reference book
0 有用 狼藉者の徒然 2015-07-13 02:42:19
可以算是一部語文學簡史吧。和我心理定義的Humanities還是略有不同。第三部分還比較有意思。
0 有用 gabriel.weng1 2022-01-25 11:05:26
A typical case of old-school (informative yet dull) historical writing; 美利坚学欧陆(德意志学术赛高!)可真是其来有自. 在其衬托下,牛津剑桥到是反动得很. 印象最深的两点:1) 《罗马帝国衰亡史》的重要性在于其体现了philosophic history与philological scholarship的结合;2) 在phi... A typical case of old-school (informative yet dull) historical writing; 美利坚学欧陆(德意志学术赛高!)可真是其来有自. 在其衬托下,牛津剑桥到是反动得很. 印象最深的两点:1) 《罗马帝国衰亡史》的重要性在于其体现了philosophic history与philological scholarship的结合;2) 在philology不断分化为modern humanities各学科这一大背景下,“古典学”(classics)的成立却是此fragmentation浪潮下之一逆流而上的小“综合” (textual philology+antiquarianism) (展开)
0 有用 puff 2020-07-21 14:34:46
语文学与哲学最大的区别是,前者以语词为切入,更重视处理经验的,解释的,可能性的问题。如此一来,现代人文学科的研究,其跨学科的倾向便愈加明显。
1 有用 泂酌。 2022-03-24 20:06:57
谁能想到,现代人文与社会科学竟有着同一个起源:语文学(philology)。谁能想到,以后现代的视角关注文本及其生成语境竟也是一种向文本语文学的“倒退”。更别提“跨学科”的提出本身就是跨越现代学科墙的“博学”(erudition)取向。