作者:
Ann M. Blair 出版社: Yale University Press 副标题: Managing Scholarly Information before the Modern Age 出版年: 2010-11-30 页数: 416 定价: USD 45.00 装帧: Hardcover ISBN: 9780300112511
The flood of information brought to us by advancing technology is often accompanied by a distressing sense of 'information overload', yet this experience is not unique to modern times. In fact, says Ann Blair in this intriguing book, the invention of the printing press and the ensuing abundance of books provoked sixteenth- and seventeenth-century European scholars to register c...
The flood of information brought to us by advancing technology is often accompanied by a distressing sense of 'information overload', yet this experience is not unique to modern times. In fact, says Ann Blair in this intriguing book, the invention of the printing press and the ensuing abundance of books provoked sixteenth- and seventeenth-century European scholars to register complaints very similar to our own. The author examines methods of information management in ancient and medieval Europe as well as the Islamic world and China, then focuses particular attention on the organization, composition, and reception of Latin reference books in print in early modern Europe. She explores in detail the sophisticated and sometimes idiosyncratic techniques that scholars and readers developed in an era of new technology and exploding information.
作者简介
· · · · · ·
Ann M. Blair is Henry Charles Lea Professor of History, Harvard University.
The representative work of "social history of knowledge" after Lucian Febvre and Peter Burke. Ann Blair shows how to get a systematic access to the study of reference books. When come to Chinese writi...The representative work of "social history of knowledge" after Lucian Febvre and Peter Burke. Ann Blair shows how to get a systematic access to the study of reference books. When come to Chinese writings, however, Blair omits discussing on the nature of leishu, which would be totally different on conceptual level with the term "encyclopedia"...(展开)
The representative work of "social history of knowledge" after Lucian Febvre and Peter Burke. Ann Blair shows how to get a systematic access to the study of reference books. When come to Chinese writi...The representative work of "social history of knowledge" after Lucian Febvre and Peter Burke. Ann Blair shows how to get a systematic access to the study of reference books. When come to Chinese writings, however, Blair omits discussing on the nature of leishu, which would be totally different on conceptual level with the term "encyclopedia"...(展开)
英文版： [Too Much to Know] 1. 原文p4，译文p20 dichotomous diagram译为二分图表，从后文看应该是树形图表/分层结构图表，外观类似思维导图，不是简单的一分为二。 2. 原文p7，译文p25 Of course, as one book historian wisely pointed out, most printed books have never...
(展开)
cnfeat
商务印书馆2014版
白驹在空谷
商务印书馆2014版
0 有用 懵の人 2020-05-17 17:04:55
很少见的在评价人数<20人的情况下接近9分的非虚构类原版图书，何况这还是10年前出版的书。
0 有用 常务副momo 2020-02-05 08:31:41
Extraordinary ability to collect, analyze, and synthesize a great variety of sources, also frequently switching between the present and early modern.
0 有用 草木有本心 2020-01-11 13:07:20
非常有见地的研究，第三章Note-Taking as Information Management可作为理解魏希德对唐宋笔记和类书相关论断的参考文章～
0 有用 月兒羊蹄 2023-04-02 11:50:24 中国香港
The representative work of "social history of knowledge" after Lucian Febvre and Peter Burke. Ann Blair shows how to get a systematic access to the study of reference books. When come to Chinese writi... The representative work of "social history of knowledge" after Lucian Febvre and Peter Burke. Ann Blair shows how to get a systematic access to the study of reference books. When come to Chinese writings, however, Blair omits discussing on the nature of leishu, which would be totally different on conceptual level with the term "encyclopedia"... (展开)
0 有用 sharpy 2011-04-16 17:33:36
講的是early modern的reference book。當時的讀書人就已經在抱怨要讀的東西太多，把眼睛弄壞了、健康也壞了……。
0 有用 白驹在空谷 2024-02-03 19:35:57 安徽
读完中文版觉得很精彩，又读一遍英文版。很“好读”但是太“难读”，有种啃鸡架的艰难和不舍……最后的结论和《索引史》殊途同归：人的专注力是非常珍贵的事物。
0 有用 felsina 2023-11-04 07:32:57 加拿大
不知道为什么，本书谈论的课题和它所代表的这种治学模式，个人都有点无感，感觉为了谈论“信息管理”搁置了太多核心要素，甚至觉得有点太契合某种时代精神了。Blair的功底都是在的，个人其实很喜欢她在Natural Particulars里面那篇讲problemata的文章。比较有意思的是自从生态转向以来，对多、丰富和过剩的探讨渐渐转向其反面，比如稀缺、节省、经济，自己也想走这个路数：）
0 有用 月兒羊蹄 2023-04-02 11:50:24 中国香港
The representative work of "social history of knowledge" after Lucian Febvre and Peter Burke. Ann Blair shows how to get a systematic access to the study of reference books. When come to Chinese writi... The representative work of "social history of knowledge" after Lucian Febvre and Peter Burke. Ann Blair shows how to get a systematic access to the study of reference books. When come to Chinese writings, however, Blair omits discussing on the nature of leishu, which would be totally different on conceptual level with the term "encyclopedia"... (展开)
0 有用 dawn 2021-10-06 21:36:21
一、二章。
0 有用 gingababa.saru 2021-08-26 17:42:15
呼！終於讀完了！除了講中國類書部分鬆散（美其名曰高屋建瓴）外過於密實的一本書。研究十五到十七世紀部分歐洲編纂adversaria等等現在統歸於reference books的部分（包括如何篩選材料、如何編目、如何在技術上實現最有效率的查找）異常紮實精彩。對我來說最好玩的是和可以Nugent那本說印刷文化對宋士人手抄本文化的影響和攝取知識方式的改變對照著看，看到十五世紀歐洲編纂者毫不猶豫剪下手抄本內... 呼！終於讀完了！除了講中國類書部分鬆散（美其名曰高屋建瓴）外過於密實的一本書。研究十五到十七世紀部分歐洲編纂adversaria等等現在統歸於reference books的部分（包括如何篩選材料、如何編目、如何在技術上實現最有效率的查找）異常紮實精彩。對我來說最好玩的是和可以Nugent那本說印刷文化對宋士人手抄本文化的影響和攝取知識方式的改變對照著看，看到十五世紀歐洲編纂者毫不猶豫剪下手抄本內容來做資料庫，再想想士人南渡時毫不猶豫拋棄刻本而珍藏手抄本，的確是很值得研究的對比。 (展开)