A New York Times bestseller
Named one of The Economist’s Books of the Year 2014
Kirkus Reviews Best Nonfiction Books of 2014
In The Big Fat Surprise, investigative journalist Nina Teicholz reveals the unthinkable: that everything we thought we knew about dietary fat is wrong. She documents how the low-fat nutrition advice of the past sixty years has amounted to a vast uncontrolled experiment on the entire population, with disastrous consequences for our health.
For decades, we have been told that the best possible diet involves cutting back on fat, especially saturated fat, and that if we are not getting healthier or thinner it must be because we are not trying hard enough. But what if the low-fat diet is itself the problem? What if the very foods we’ve been denying ourselves—the creamy cheeses, the sizzling steaks—are themselves the key to reversing the epidemics of obesity, diabetes, and heart disease?
In this captivating, vibrant, and convincing narrative, based on a nine-year-long investigation, Teicholz shows how the misinformation about saturated fats took hold in the scientific community and the public imagination, and how recent findings have overturned these beliefs. She explains why the Mediterranean Diet is not the healthiest, and how we might be replacing trans fats with something even worse. This startling history demonstrates how nutrition science has gotten it so wrong: how overzealous researchers, through a combination of ego, bias, and premature institutional consensus, have allowed dangerous misrepresentations to become dietary dogma.
With eye-opening scientific rigor, The Big Fat Surprise upends the conventional wisdom about all fats with the groundbreaking claim that more, not less, dietary fat—including saturated fat—is what leads to better health and wellness. Science shows that we have been needlessly avoiding meat, cheese, whole milk, and eggs for decades and that we can now, guilt-free, welcome these delicious foods back into our lives.
0 有用 Sally 2025-01-19 03:24:20 美国
人类仍处在生命科学的萌芽阶段。过去这一百年因为美国政府的影响力错误的饮食观点传播得尤其广,致使很多人尤其是美国民众深受其害。个人觉得这种质疑的声音很可贵,但也不能矫枉过正。知道能放开吃肉我还是很开心的。
0 有用 magicsagill 2017-10-15 23:58:02
看的中文版《令人大感意外的脂肪》。P84:“心脏病研究与其说是科学,更像是政治。”一位并不严谨的营养学家的上位,影响了千千万万人的饮食观念。脂肪被冤枉,碳水化合物/糖上位,反而造成了更多“文明病”的产生。
3 有用 虫虎兽 2015-05-24 05:09:06
只会跑相关系数和p-value的民科都是流氓
1 有用 AMY园 2014-12-12 09:26:56
本书与Time 6月23号封面故事的观点基本一致,矛头直指FDA的饮食金字塔,指出几个饮食误区1.高脂饮食可能比高碳水饮食更健康,不要怕吃肉吃油;2. 要学会区分饱和脂肪和反式脂肪,前者其实有益于身体。书中提供了历史数据,表明几十年乃至上百年前,在没有什么low-fat概念、人人大口吃肉的年代,其实活得更健康。
2 有用 InWonderland 2015-03-22 22:51:55
前述论证比较冗长,可以之间看conclusion,就是心血管疾病与脂肪没有太大关系,更多现在研究表明是可能与碳水化合物有关,所以作者认为应该勇敢像祖先那样多吃肉。