Emmanuel Levinas is one of the most important figures of twentieth-century philosophy. Exerting a profound influence upon such thinkers as Derrida, Lyotard, Blanchot, and Irigaray, Levinas's work bridges several major gaps in the evolution of continental philosophy—between modern and postmodern, phenomenology and poststructuralism, ethics and ontology. He is credited with having spurred a revitalized interest in ethics-based philosophy throughout Europe and America.
Entre Nous (Between Us) is the culmination of Levinas's philosophy. Published in France a few years before his death, it gathers his most important work and reveals the development of his thought over nearly forty years of committed inquiry. Along with several trenchant interviews published here, these essays engage with issues of suffering, love, religion, culture, justice, human rights, and legal theory. Taken together, they constitute a key to Levinas's ideas on the ethical dimensions of otherness.
Working from the phenomenological method of Edmund Husserl and Martin Heidegger, Levinas pushed beyond the limits of their framework to argue that it is ethics, not ontology, that orients philosophy, and that responsibility precedes reasoning. Ethics for Levinas means responsibility in relation to difference. Throughout his work, Levinas returns to the metaphor of the face of the other to discuss how and where responsibility enters our lives and makes philosophy necessary. For Levinas, ethics begins with our face to face interaction with another person—seeing that person not as a reflection of one's self, nor as a threat, but as different and greater than self. Levinas moves the reader to recognize the implications of this interaction: our abiding responsibility for the other, and our concern with the other's suffering and death.
Situated at the crossroads of several philosophical schools and approaches, Levinas's work illuminates a host of critical issues and has found resonances among students and scholars of literature, law, religion, and politics. Entre Nous is at once the apotheosis of his work and an accessible introduction to it. In the end, Levinas's urgent meditations upon the face of the other suggest a new foundation upon which to grasp the nature of good and evil in the tangled skein of our lives.
3 有用 非行少女神乃襞 2024-02-25 19:08:55 上海
还是有太多可疑的地方,列维纳斯的确谈到无辜并非主体内在的绝对主权的裁断,但它并没有取消这一主权而仅仅是把他移交他者的面容而已,那么我们究竟还能如何把面容与律法相区(即使列维纳斯强调这种主权缺乏强制力(能)=合法性,但似乎合法性也只是被分离出来以独一性的形态重新被植入主体之中)?当他高呼为他者而死的伦理我们难道不会怀疑这是一种律法式的狂热?换言之,列维纳斯关注的并不是裸露或者脆弱本身,而是裸露或脆弱... 还是有太多可疑的地方,列维纳斯的确谈到无辜并非主体内在的绝对主权的裁断,但它并没有取消这一主权而仅仅是把他移交他者的面容而已,那么我们究竟还能如何把面容与律法相区(即使列维纳斯强调这种主权缺乏强制力(能)=合法性,但似乎合法性也只是被分离出来以独一性的形态重新被植入主体之中)?当他高呼为他者而死的伦理我们难道不会怀疑这是一种律法式的狂热?换言之,列维纳斯关注的并不是裸露或者脆弱本身,而是裸露或脆弱朝向我的显现,而且他显然乐观地相信这种显现所印刻的暴力是可以被伦理所中和,进而这一伦理也是可以和某种特定的社会形态相调和的... (展开)
1 有用 油炸托克思 2018-05-30 01:22:56
大师之作!
1 有用 孤泪君 2022-05-03 11:40:40
the face; responsible; totality; religion; thinking vs. unthinking self; fault; Man-God
2 有用 嗤嗤 2023-03-17 08:57:49 湖北
優しすぎる
0 有用 梅歏 2024-08-23 06:37:54 比利时
还行。基本上没有在systematic work找不到的观点,但优点是足够短且精致,如果适应列维纳斯的文笔读下来还是有收获的。