From one end of his philosophical work to the other, Gilles Deleuze consistently described his position as a transcendental empiricism. But just what is transcendental about Deleuze ' s transcendental empiricism? And how does his position fit with the traditional empiricism articulated by Hume? In Difference and Givenness, Levi Bryant addresses these long-neglected questions so critical to an understanding of Deleuze ' s thinking. Through a close examination of Deleuze ' s independent work--focusing especially on Difference and Repetition-- as well as his engagement with thinkers such as Kant, Ma i mon, Bergson, and Simondon, Bryant sets out to unearth Deleuze ' s transcendental empiricism and to show how it differs from transcendental idealism, absolute idealism, and traditional empiricism.and nbsp; What emerges from these efforts is a metaphysics that strives to articulate the conditions for real existence, capable of accounting for the individual itself without falling into conceptual or essentialist abstraction. In Bryant ' s analysis, Deleuze ' s metaphysics articulates an account of being as process or creative individuation based on difference, as well as a challenging critique--and explanation--of essentialist substance ontologies. A clear and powerful discussion of how Deleuze ' s project relates to two of the most influential strains in the history of philosophy, this book will prove essential to anyone seeking to understand Deleuze ' s thought and its specific contribution to metaphysics and epistemology.and nbsp;
4 有用 Ludwigsama 2022-03-19 17:48:59
对经验主义谬误的批评,以及将理念—问题的展开、或者说个体化进程与时间的联系(与经验主义外在差异不同的内在差异应该被理解为时间性的差异(也就是重复,或者说永恒回归),而正是这种差异给出了个体的发生学;德勒兹的奇异性不能被直接地理解为奇点(尽管德勒兹对微分方程的类比很容易让人如此理解),因为奇异性本身有时间性的维度,它意味着一种“趋势”,一种即将发生的变化(“亚稳态”))都是完全正确的。但问题在于,我... 对经验主义谬误的批评,以及将理念—问题的展开、或者说个体化进程与时间的联系(与经验主义外在差异不同的内在差异应该被理解为时间性的差异(也就是重复,或者说永恒回归),而正是这种差异给出了个体的发生学;德勒兹的奇异性不能被直接地理解为奇点(尽管德勒兹对微分方程的类比很容易让人如此理解),因为奇异性本身有时间性的维度,它意味着一种“趋势”,一种即将发生的变化(“亚稳态”))都是完全正确的。但问题在于,我不能理解bryant要搞的相遇的现象学(在其中,有一个通过(经验1的)相遇从经验2(也就是庸俗的,建立在识别基础上的日常经验)的层面上升到先验的过程)在多大程度上真的是一种德勒兹主义的思想,比起文学家德勒兹,形而上学家德勒兹对我而言或许更加有趣,在后者这里,不再有上升,只有被预设了的对于实在的直观。 (展开)
0 有用 chaosmori 2024-05-24 21:35:26 广东
天哪我怎么这么多书没标 失忆了