出版社: The MIT Press
副标题: Studies in Marxist Dialectics
译者: Rodney Livingstone
出版年: 1972-11-15
页数: 408
定价: USD 38.00
装帧: Paperback
ISBN: 9780262620208
内容简介 · · · · · ·
This is the first time one of the most important of Lukacs' early theoretical writings, published in Germany in 1923, has been made available in English. The book consists of a series of essays treating, among other topics, the definition of orthodox Marxism, the question of legality and illegality, Rosa Luxemburg as a Marxist, the changing function of Historic Marxism, class c...
This is the first time one of the most important of Lukacs' early theoretical writings, published in Germany in 1923, has been made available in English. The book consists of a series of essays treating, among other topics, the definition of orthodox Marxism, the question of legality and illegality, Rosa Luxemburg as a Marxist, the changing function of Historic Marxism, class consciousness, and the substantiation and consciousness of the Proletariat.Writing in 1968, on the occasion of the appearance of his collected works, Lukacs evaluated the influence of this book as follows:"For the historical effect of History and Class Consciousness and also for the actuality of the present time one problem is of decisive importance: alienation, which is here treated for the first time since Marx as the central question of a revolutionary critique of capitalism, and whose historical as well as methodological origins are deeply rooted in Hegelian dialectic. It goes without saying that the problem was omnipresent. A few years after History and Class Consciousness was published, it was moved into the focus of philosophical discussion by Heidegger in his Being and Time, a place which it maintains to this day largely as a result of the position occupied by Sartre and his followers. The philologic question raised by L. Goldmann, who considered Heidegger's work partly as a polemic reply to my (admittedly unnamed) work, need not be discussed here. It suffices today to say that the problem was in the air, particularly if we analyze its background in detail in order to clarify its effect, the mixture of Marxist and Existentialist thought processes, which prevailed especially in France immediately after the Second World War. In this connection priorities, influences, and so on are not particularly significant. What is important is that the alienation of man was recognized and appreciated as the central problem of the time in which we live, by bourgeois as well as proletarian, by politically rightist and leftist thinkers. Thus, History and Class Consciousness exerted a profound effect in the circles of the youthful intelligentsia."George Lichtheim, also in 1968, writes that "...The originality of the early Lukacs lay in the assertion that the totality of history could be apprehended by adopting a particular 'class standpoint': that of the proletariat. Class consciousness;not indeed the empirical consciousness of the actual proletariat, which was hopelessly entangled with the surface aspects of objective reality, but an ideal-typical consciousness proper to a class which radically negates the existing order of reality: that was the formula which had made it possible for the Lukacs of 1923 to unify theory and practice."
History and Class Consciousness的创作者
· · · · · ·
-
格奥尔格·卢卡奇 作者
喜欢读"History and Class Consciousness"的人也喜欢 · · · · · ·
History and Class Consciousness的书评 · · · · · · ( 全部 38 条 )
《历史与阶级意识》读书笔记
这篇书评可能有关键情节透露
细读《什么是正统的马克思主义?》《阶级意识》《历史唯物主义的功能变化》《合法性和非法性》《物化和无产阶级意识》等篇并做笔记,按卢卡奇在前言中推荐的阅读顺序排列。 译序 由卢卡奇1919年到1922年在党的工作岗位上为革命运动的理论与组织问题写下的八篇文章。专门为结集... (展开)纯粹总体性批判: 对卢卡奇的《历史与阶级意识》第一篇《什么是正统马克思主义》辩证
这篇书评可能有关键情节透露
人的思维是否具有客观的〔gegenstandliche〕真理性,这并不是一个理论的问题,而是一个实践的问题。人应该在实践中证明自己思维的真理性,即自己思维的现实性和力量,亦即自己思维的此岸性。关于离开实践的思维是否现实的争论,是一个纯粹经院哲学的问题。 ——... (展开)张双利_课程笔记——卢卡奇与总体性
这篇书评可能有关键情节透露
一、问题意识:理论危机与经验困惑 理论问题:资本主义的文明危机(Weber、Simmel)——历史的终结能否被打破? 现实问题:革命为什么失败(匈牙利革命)? 二、物化和无产阶级意识 《历史与阶级意识》共收录了八篇文章,前四篇正本清源,首先回到马克思本人,提出什么事正统的... (展开)> 更多书评 38篇
论坛 · · · · · ·
在这本书的论坛里发言这本书的其他版本 · · · · · · ( 全部14 )
-
商务印书馆 (1992)8.9分 1235人读过
-
商务印书馆 (2018)9.2分 240人读过
-
商务印书馆 (2009)8.9分 144人读过
-
华夏出版社 (1989)8.3分 35人读过
以下书单推荐 · · · · · · ( 全部 )
- Critical Theory (ateng)
- 已入 (悲伤冷笑女)
- Marxism (Mnemosyne)
- 马克思主义必读 (王璞一零一)
- 中译本快快出来!!! (吴情)
谁读这本书? · · · · · ·
二手市场
· · · · · ·
订阅关于History and Class Consciousness的评论:
feed: rss 2.0
0 有用 Ιάννης Ξενάκης 2024-05-08 15:10:20 广东
勉强四
0 有用 曳尾.avi 2018-09-14 08:08:12
马克思的异化和卢卡奇的物化大概是一个过程的两种视角
0 有用 Jolyn 2009-02-14 11:14:47
part of it
0 有用 東邪黃藥師 2022-03-06 22:20:06
Lukacs' most satisfied work, he abandoned Engels dialectics of nature, combined weber's rationalization criticism and Cassirer's symbolic criticism, integrated the strong latitude of subjectivity in M... Lukacs' most satisfied work, he abandoned Engels dialectics of nature, combined weber's rationalization criticism and Cassirer's symbolic criticism, integrated the strong latitude of subjectivity in Marx's historical dialectics (展开)
1 有用 红河谷的莲儿 2015-09-25 08:25:33
真是够难懂的,读着火大。异化理论尤其冗长难懂,历史唯物主义那部分还好。。
0 有用 紫曦 2024-09-29 14:31:02 美国
还是用这个我比较熟练
0 有用 Ιάννης Ξενάκης 2024-05-08 15:10:20 广东
勉强四
0 有用 清明士人 2023-06-25 05:49:01 美国
“辩证法可以碎大石。” 我爱卢卡奇,但读到后面感觉他开始重复之前的话,Reification and the Consciousness of the Proletariat尤为难读。也许这就是爱情吧,始于惊异,回归于平淡(你哪儿来这么些废话!)。 Legality and illegality说要先有新意识形态再有社会革命。一方面这是关系到他关切的欧洲革命形势失败的问题,另一方面也好奇多大程度上... “辩证法可以碎大石。” 我爱卢卡奇,但读到后面感觉他开始重复之前的话,Reification and the Consciousness of the Proletariat尤为难读。也许这就是爱情吧,始于惊异,回归于平淡(你哪儿来这么些废话!)。 Legality and illegality说要先有新意识形态再有社会革命。一方面这是关系到他关切的欧洲革命形势失败的问题,另一方面也好奇多大程度上是为了与苏俄保持一致;倒数第二篇写卢森堡的文章有失水准。可能也是因为早期卢卡奇过于重视意识形态在未实现的欧洲革命中的作用,他才如此看重灌输意识的党作为无产阶级的代表。当然卢卡奇也说要有生动的自我批评,等等。 最尾的关键词注释应该先读,很有用。 (展开)
0 有用 Ludwigsama 2022-09-21 11:35:16 上海
对于卢卡奇,在辩证法中,当每一种“对象性形式”的最终融化,每一种被给予者(“事实”)被扬弃为总体中的一个环节,我们看到了一种中介过程——恰恰是中介过程开启了“生成”。但问题在于,这种通过“中介”的“融化”与“扬弃”究竟是如何可能的呢?在这里,辩证法被和主体的“行动”联系在了一起:行动通过把被给予者看做是由主体设定的(经由中介的,卢卡奇很明确地指出了这一设定与中介之间的关系)而消除了被给予者的被给予... 对于卢卡奇,在辩证法中,当每一种“对象性形式”的最终融化,每一种被给予者(“事实”)被扬弃为总体中的一个环节,我们看到了一种中介过程——恰恰是中介过程开启了“生成”。但问题在于,这种通过“中介”的“融化”与“扬弃”究竟是如何可能的呢?在这里,辩证法被和主体的“行动”联系在了一起:行动通过把被给予者看做是由主体设定的(经由中介的,卢卡奇很明确地指出了这一设定与中介之间的关系)而消除了被给予者的被给予性(取消因此就是对最初设定行动的在其自我意识层面上的重复)。故而,辩证的过程就是被给予者被中介地设定,再被不断被重新设定,最终被彻底溶解的过程。在这个意义上,生成的历史对于卢卡奇来说恰恰是行动的历史,或者说“人类生活方式的历史”。 (展开)
0 有用 浅殇 2022-09-19 13:07:39 浙江
很不错!