This is the first time one of the most important of Lukacs' early theoretical writings, published in Germany in 1923, has been made available in English. The book consists of a series of essays treating, among other topics, the definition of orthodox Marxism, the question of legality and illegality, Rosa Luxemburg as a Marxist, the changing function of Historic Marxism, class c...
This is the first time one of the most important of Lukacs' early theoretical writings, published in Germany in 1923, has been made available in English. The book consists of a series of essays treating, among other topics, the definition of orthodox Marxism, the question of legality and illegality, Rosa Luxemburg as a Marxist, the changing function of Historic Marxism, class consciousness, and the substantiation and consciousness of the Proletariat.Writing in 1968, on the occasion of the appearance of his collected works, Lukacs evaluated the influence of this book as follows:"For the historical effect of History and Class Consciousness and also for the actuality of the present time one problem is of decisive importance: alienation, which is here treated for the first time since Marx as the central question of a revolutionary critique of capitalism, and whose historical as well as methodological origins are deeply rooted in Hegelian dialectic. It goes without saying that the problem was omnipresent. A few years after History and Class Consciousness was published, it was moved into the focus of philosophical discussion by Heidegger in his Being and Time, a place which it maintains to this day largely as a result of the position occupied by Sartre and his followers. The philologic question raised by L. Goldmann, who considered Heidegger's work partly as a polemic reply to my (admittedly unnamed) work, need not be discussed here. It suffices today to say that the problem was in the air, particularly if we analyze its background in detail in order to clarify its effect, the mixture of Marxist and Existentialist thought processes, which prevailed especially in France immediately after the Second World War. In this connection priorities, influences, and so on are not particularly significant. What is important is that the alienation of man was recognized and appreciated as the central problem of the time in which we live, by bourgeois as well as proletarian, by politically rightist and leftist thinkers. Thus, History and Class Consciousness exerted a profound effect in the circles of the youthful intelligentsia."George Lichtheim, also in 1968, writes that "...The originality of the early Lukacs lay in the assertion that the totality of history could be apprehended by adopting a particular 'class standpoint': that of the proletariat. Class consciousness;not indeed the empirical consciousness of the actual proletariat, which was hopelessly entangled with the surface aspects of objective reality, but an ideal-typical consciousness proper to a class which radically negates the existing order of reality: that was the formula which had made it possible for the Lukacs of 1923 to unify theory and practice."
Lukacs' most satisfied work, he abandoned Engels dialectics of nature, combined weber's rationalization criticism and Cassirer's symbolic criticism, integrated the strong latitude of subjectivity in M...Lukacs' most satisfied work, he abandoned Engels dialectics of nature, combined weber's rationalization criticism and Cassirer's symbolic criticism, integrated the strong latitude of subjectivity in Marx's historical dialectics(展开)
Georg Lukacs《历史与阶级意识》的思路 这是青年Lukacs在1919-1922年写的一些文章的结集,却是Lukacs最重要的作品,也是思想史上尤其是左派思想最重要的经典之一。剑桥20世纪政治思想史中说:“Lukacs是第一个严肃地评估黑格尔在马克思思想形成中的作用并重新把握到...
(展开)
0 有用 Ludwigsama 2022-09-21 11:35:16 上海
对于卢卡奇,在辩证法中,当每一种“对象性形式”的最终融化,每一种被给予者(“事实”)被扬弃为总体中的一个环节,我们看到了一种中介过程——恰恰是中介过程开启了“生成”。但问题在于,这种通过“中介”的“融化”与“扬弃”究竟是如何可能的呢?在这里,辩证法被和主体的“行动”联系在了一起:行动通过把被给予者看做是由主体设定的(经由中介的,卢卡奇很明确地指出了这一设定与中介之间的关系)而消除了被给予者的被给予... 对于卢卡奇,在辩证法中,当每一种“对象性形式”的最终融化,每一种被给予者(“事实”)被扬弃为总体中的一个环节,我们看到了一种中介过程——恰恰是中介过程开启了“生成”。但问题在于,这种通过“中介”的“融化”与“扬弃”究竟是如何可能的呢?在这里,辩证法被和主体的“行动”联系在了一起:行动通过把被给予者看做是由主体设定的(经由中介的,卢卡奇很明确地指出了这一设定与中介之间的关系)而消除了被给予者的被给予性(取消因此就是对最初设定行动的在其自我意识层面上的重复)。故而,辩证的过程就是被给予者被中介地设定,再被不断被重新设定,最终被彻底溶解的过程。在这个意义上,生成的历史对于卢卡奇来说恰恰是行动的历史,或者说“人类生活方式的历史”。 (展开)
0 有用 東邪黃藥師 2022-03-06 22:20:06
Lukacs' most satisfied work, he abandoned Engels dialectics of nature, combined weber's rationalization criticism and Cassirer's symbolic criticism, integrated the strong latitude of subjectivity in M... Lukacs' most satisfied work, he abandoned Engels dialectics of nature, combined weber's rationalization criticism and Cassirer's symbolic criticism, integrated the strong latitude of subjectivity in Marx's historical dialectics (展开)
0 有用 塞巴斯蒂安 2022-05-10 12:47:01
封面帅的
0 有用 nek 2019-10-12 16:37:46
心力交瘁。。
1 有用 红河谷的莲儿 2015-09-25 08:25:33
真是够难懂的,读着火大。异化理论尤其冗长难懂,历史唯物主义那部分还好。。