This is the first time one of the most important of Lukacs' early theoretical writings, published in Germany in 1923, has been made available in English. The book consists of a series of essays treating, among other topics, the definition of orthodox Marxism, the question of legality and illegality, Rosa Luxemburg as a Marxist, the changing function of Historic Marxism, class c...
This is the first time one of the most important of Lukacs' early theoretical writings, published in Germany in 1923, has been made available in English. The book consists of a series of essays treating, among other topics, the definition of orthodox Marxism, the question of legality and illegality, Rosa Luxemburg as a Marxist, the changing function of Historic Marxism, class consciousness, and the substantiation and consciousness of the Proletariat.Writing in 1968, on the occasion of the appearance of his collected works, Lukacs evaluated the influence of this book as follows:"For the historical effect of History and Class Consciousness and also for the actuality of the present time one problem is of decisive importance: alienation, which is here treated for the first time since Marx as the central question of a revolutionary critique of capitalism, and whose historical as well as methodological origins are deeply rooted in Hegelian dialectic. It goes without saying that the problem was omnipresent. A few years after History and Class Consciousness was published, it was moved into the focus of philosophical discussion by Heidegger in his Being and Time, a place which it maintains to this day largely as a result of the position occupied by Sartre and his followers. The philologic question raised by L. Goldmann, who considered Heidegger's work partly as a polemic reply to my (admittedly unnamed) work, need not be discussed here. It suffices today to say that the problem was in the air, particularly if we analyze its background in detail in order to clarify its effect, the mixture of Marxist and Existentialist thought processes, which prevailed especially in France immediately after the Second World War. In this connection priorities, influences, and so on are not particularly significant. What is important is that the alienation of man was recognized and appreciated as the central problem of the time in which we live, by bourgeois as well as proletarian, by politically rightist and leftist thinkers. Thus, History and Class Consciousness exerted a profound effect in the circles of the youthful intelligentsia."George Lichtheim, also in 1968, writes that "...The originality of the early Lukacs lay in the assertion that the totality of history could be apprehended by adopting a particular 'class standpoint': that of the proletariat. Class consciousness;not indeed the empirical consciousness of the actual proletariat, which was hopelessly entangled with the surface aspects of objective reality, but an ideal-typical consciousness proper to a class which radically negates the existing order of reality: that was the formula which had made it possible for the Lukacs of 1923 to unify theory and practice."
“辩证法可以碎大石。”
我爱卢卡奇,但读到后面感觉他开始重复之前的话,Reification and the Consciousness of the Proletariat尤为难读。也许这就是爱情吧,始于惊异,回归于平淡(你哪儿来这么些废话!)。
Legality and illegality说要先有新意识形态再有社会革命。一方面这是关系到他关切的欧洲革命形势失败的问题,另一方面也好奇多大程度上...“辩证法可以碎大石。”
我爱卢卡奇,但读到后面感觉他开始重复之前的话,Reification and the Consciousness of the Proletariat尤为难读。也许这就是爱情吧,始于惊异,回归于平淡(你哪儿来这么些废话!)。
Legality and illegality说要先有新意识形态再有社会革命。一方面这是关系到他关切的欧洲革命形势失败的问题,另一方面也好奇多大程度上是为了与苏俄保持一致;倒数第二篇写卢森堡的文章有失水准。可能也是因为早期卢卡奇过于重视意识形态在未实现的欧洲革命中的作用,他才如此看重灌输意识的党作为无产阶级的代表。当然卢卡奇也说要有生动的自我批评,等等。
最尾的关键词注释应该先读,很有用。(展开)
Georg Lukacs《历史与阶级意识》的思路 这是青年Lukacs在1919-1922年写的一些文章的结集,却是Lukacs最重要的作品,也是思想史上尤其是左派思想最重要的经典之一。剑桥20世纪政治思想史中说:“Lukacs是第一个严肃地评估黑格尔在马克思思想形成中的作用并重新把握到...
(展开)
0 有用 炎武 2023-06-25 05:49:01 美国
“辩证法可以碎大石。” 我爱卢卡奇,但读到后面感觉他开始重复之前的话,Reification and the Consciousness of the Proletariat尤为难读。也许这就是爱情吧,始于惊异,回归于平淡(你哪儿来这么些废话!)。 Legality and illegality说要先有新意识形态再有社会革命。一方面这是关系到他关切的欧洲革命形势失败的问题,另一方面也好奇多大程度上... “辩证法可以碎大石。” 我爱卢卡奇,但读到后面感觉他开始重复之前的话,Reification and the Consciousness of the Proletariat尤为难读。也许这就是爱情吧,始于惊异,回归于平淡(你哪儿来这么些废话!)。 Legality and illegality说要先有新意识形态再有社会革命。一方面这是关系到他关切的欧洲革命形势失败的问题,另一方面也好奇多大程度上是为了与苏俄保持一致;倒数第二篇写卢森堡的文章有失水准。可能也是因为早期卢卡奇过于重视意识形态在未实现的欧洲革命中的作用,他才如此看重灌输意识的党作为无产阶级的代表。当然卢卡奇也说要有生动的自我批评,等等。 最尾的关键词注释应该先读,很有用。 (展开)
1 有用 刘北托 2019-07-31 14:10:11
作为一本marxism的书,标价50刀让我有点接受无能。
1 有用 红河谷的莲儿 2015-09-25 08:25:33
真是够难懂的,读着火大。异化理论尤其冗长难懂,历史唯物主义那部分还好。。
0 有用 法厄同 2018-08-21 22:55:22
后面整个西马的意识形态策略,很大程度上就是来源于卢卡奇基于知识领域的“劳动分工”是一场骗局的判断延展开的,卢卡奇主张重新恢复总体性以对抗资本主义无限分工带来的人的悬置。核心几篇论述比较啰嗦,但是观点非常精彩。后面西马很多的概念都是来源于这本书,当然再往回可以追溯到马克思和黑格尔。
0 有用 Pasdei 2018-12-16 17:46:13
读了一点点,感觉Lukács的思路有些奇奇怪怪的- -可是显然是Peter的菜吗