Bentham and Marx agreed on two fundamental points which are relevant to my present them: first, that their tasks as social thinkers were to clear men's mind as to the true character of human society, and, secondly, that human society and its legal structure which had worked so much human misery, had been protected from criticism by myths, mysteries, and illusions, not all of them intentionally generated, yet all of them profitable to interested parties.
the 'alienated' man, has come to think of the structure of society, legal and economic, not as a human creation but as an external object having power over man. 'His own creation [appears as] a force alien to him...his power over the object as the power of the object over him, the master of his creation appears as its slave.'
The simple but... (查看原文)
This insistence, though it may seem a merely linguistic matter, was the very centre, and I would say the sane and healthy centre, of the legal positivism of which Bentham may be regarded as the founder.
Hence nothing follows from the statement that law so defined exist as to any moral reason for obedience: that vital issue, Bentham thought, must await the judgement of utility on the content of the laws. (查看原文)
哈特 作者
0 有用 羽觞 2018-03-27 22:03:52
边沁与奥斯丁命令说的联系 法律义务和责任 制裁 命令与权威法律理由
0 有用 呼啸笋 2023-08-29 13:51:03 上海
前半本和后半本差异明显。第六章和第十章要精读。
0 有用 小p 2016-04-04 14:13:15
书是本非常好的书，但是太难了。而且这本书其实和边沁的理论关系不那么大，倒是很有利于理解哈特的想法，但真的是太难了。
0 有用 未眠甜筒 2019-01-03 16:56:17
我读的是张延祥的博士论文《边沁法理学的理论基础研究》，也是法律出版社的。读了英文版再读这本中文版分析，简直牛头不对马嘴。功利主义翻译就很别扭。没耐心看下去了。2016年出版的书。也就这样了。
0 有用 南风🌈 2020-12-18 12:16:38
边沁的基本工作在于对法律的去神秘化：剥去法律的盛大设置所激起的盲目的或不应有的尊重，用自然、理性的证据法取代那个时代的人为技术体系。 取法贝卡里亚的刑罚观，刑罚和其他任何社会制度一样，不仅可能、而且应当置于理性批判之下，而不应由不值得信赖的反感或同情来指引。由此将法律与道德的分离命题的解牛刀切入刑法之中：使用的刑罚应当轻到足以抵消人们期望从犯罪中获得的利益即可。继续推演，浮现的是功用的计算问题：功... 边沁的基本工作在于对法律的去神秘化：剥去法律的盛大设置所激起的盲目的或不应有的尊重，用自然、理性的证据法取代那个时代的人为技术体系。 取法贝卡里亚的刑罚观，刑罚和其他任何社会制度一样，不仅可能、而且应当置于理性批判之下，而不应由不值得信赖的反感或同情来指引。由此将法律与道德的分离命题的解牛刀切入刑法之中：使用的刑罚应当轻到足以抵消人们期望从犯罪中获得的利益即可。继续推演，浮现的是功用的计算问题：功利主义与法律权利在边沁的雕刻刀下石褪玉露。 当然，哈特并非亦步亦趋于边沁： 1.普遍化的功利主义需要沿着穆勒的“实利”原理进行精细化的呈现：普世权利应当被视为个体好处的形式，构成人类幸福与个体存在的根基。 2.拒绝边沁的法律命令理论，哈特引入“独立于内容的专断理由”以重塑现代民主社会的法律权威观。 (展开)