Media history is millions, even billions, of years old. That is the premise of this pioneering and provocative book, which argues that to adequately understand contemporary media culture we must set out from material realities that precede media themselves—Earth’s history, geological formations, minerals, and energy. And to do so, writes Jussi Parikka, is to confront the profound environmental and social implications of this ubiquitous, but hardly ephemeral, realm of modern life.
Exploring the resource depletion and material resourcing required for us to use our devices to live networked lives, Parikka grounds his analysis in Siegfried Zielinski’s widely discussed notion of deep time—but takes it back millennia. Not only are rare earth minerals and many other materials needed to make our digital media machines work, he observes, but used and obsolete media technologies return to the earth as residue of digital culture, contributing to growing layers of toxic waste for future archaeologists to ponder. Parikka shows that these materials must be considered alongside the often dangerous and exploitative labor processes that refine them into the devices underlying our seemingly virtual or immaterial practices.
A Geology of Media demonstrates that the environment does not just surround our media cultural world—it runs through it, enables it, and hosts it in an era of unprecedented climate change. While looking backward to Earth’s distant past, it also looks forward to a more expansive media theory—and, implicitly, media activism.
AWARDS
Outstanding Academic Title—Choice
0 有用 fff勒内 2024-12-07 19:28:58 德国
可以想象十年前出版时应该还是很有理论价值:很多提议已经被后续研究所展开和细化。但是因为什么都想说所以什么也没说出来,洋洋洒洒的引用基本湮灭了所有方法论上更加细致的区别(Ernst-Zielinski)。不过对我而言最成问题的是of这个属格:nature/geology只是用来拓宽digital media 的物质边界,resource/affordance仍要回到media本身(所以Parikka... 可以想象十年前出版时应该还是很有理论价值:很多提议已经被后续研究所展开和细化。但是因为什么都想说所以什么也没说出来,洋洋洒洒的引用基本湮灭了所有方法论上更加细致的区别(Ernst-Zielinski)。不过对我而言最成问题的是of这个属格:nature/geology只是用来拓宽digital media 的物质边界,resource/affordance仍要回到media本身(所以Parikka的medianature和Haraway的natureculture完全不是一个物种)。通篇似乎都在谈物质但是根本没有在谈真正的物质:relating而非relationality。 (展开)
1 有用 felsina 2023-12-23 07:02:13 加拿大
不评价了,以及当代深时话语真是值得警惕,本书的这种“全球”框架也显得太廉价了。
1 有用 𝑾𝒂𝒍𝒅𝒆𝒊𝒏𝒔𝒂𝒎𝒌𝒆𝒊𝒕 2023-04-13 09:55:04 江苏
帕里卡总是能够找到很有趣的主题,然后把它写水
0 有用 gongong 2020-04-14 17:33:53
喜欢
0 有用 Ducky鸭仔 2018-02-01 10:14:22
彻底看不懂@_@