刺猬的正义

原文摘录   · · · · · ·  ( 全部 )

• Some speech-act skeptics insist that the close connection between moral judgments and motives I mentioned earlier shows that moral judgments cannot be beliefs, and so cannot be true or false, because beliefs cannot provide motives by themselves. I may believe that aspirin will relieve my pain, but it doesn’t follow that I am in any way inclined to take aspirin. I will feel that urge only if I have an in dependent desire that my pain cease. So if moral judgments do provide motives by themselves, they cannot be beliefs. We need a second act in which we declare them just emotional outbursts or declarations of some desire or plan; it is the emotion or desire or plan that supplies the near-automatic motivation we find. This simple-sounding argument hides a great variety of complexities, refinem... (查看原文)

  元非 2赞 2018-08-18 10:27:28

• 然而，假设政府做出完全相反的选择：不论人们做出何种选择，财富都均等。就像大富翁游游戏那样，每隔几年，政府收回每个人的财富进行等额再分配。这是对个人生活自主责任的不尊重，因为他们的任何选择一不论是选择工作还是退休，不论是选择储蓄还是投资一一都不会对他们个人产生任何影响。 (查看原文)

  豆友1480552 1赞 2021-09-03 07:10:07

> 全部原文摘录