In Geontologies Elizabeth A. Povinelli continues her project of mapping the current conditions of late liberalism by offering a bold retheorization of power. Finding Foucauldian biopolitics unable to adequately reveal contemporary mechanisms of power and governance, Povinelli describes a mode of power she calls geontopower, which operates through the regulation of the distinction between Life and Nonlife and the figures of the Desert, the Animist, and the Virus. Geontologies examines this formation of power from the perspective of Indigenous Australian maneuvers against the settler state. And it probes how our contemporary critical languages—anthropogenic climate change, plasticity, new materialism, antinormativity—often unwittingly transform their struggles against geontopower into a deeper entwinement within it. A woman who became a river, a snakelike entity who spawns the fog, plesiosaurus fossils and vast networks of rock weirs: in asking how these different forms of existence refuse incorporation into the vocabularies of Western theory Povinelli provides a revelatory new way to understand a form of power long self-evident in certain regimes of settler late liberalism but now becoming visible much further beyond.
Review
"Between bios and geos, Life and Nonlife: not an opposition, rather a composition. Beyond biopolitics lies the realm of 'geontology,' where the living and the nonliving co-compose to produce singular modes of existence and forms of power—and empowerment. In Geontologies Elizabeth A. Povinelli presents exemplary figures of geontology that are once symptomatic of the late liberal condition and open it onto its own beyond. Her thought-provoking analyses engage political and ontological complexities with an uncommon richness of detail and insight toward a rethinking of cultural politics."
(Brian Massumi, author of Ontopower: War, Powers, and the State of Perception)
"Elizabeth A. Povinelli’s writing remains a continual confrontation with the otherwise. On one hand we have a classical anthropologist totally at home and committed to her field; on the other hand, gone are the attempts to 'capture' and 'explain.' Instead, we have indigenous categories engaging in an exciting intellectual gymnastics with philosophy and theory to help us think our moment: the moment when the nonliving erupts into our spaces, transforming itself from a background to something that makes demands on us."
(Ghassan Hage, author of Alter-Politics: Critical Anthropology and the Radical Imagination)
"Geontologies is a dense work that resists being described in telegraphic terms, based as it is in dazzling and far-reaching theoretical and philosophical readings. But Povinelli’s key concepts of 'geontology' and 'geontopower' are an invaluable contribution to our much-needed critical lexicon, [and] the concepts and modes of engagement presented in Geontologies, though firmly rooted in the experience and particular governance of Australian settler late liberalism, demand to be taken up and translated in other contexts."
(Shela Sheikh Avery Review)
1 有用 倪湛舸 2021-02-03 03:33:19
补一个,如果说修真针对的是biopower,那么盗墓就在engage这个geontopower,前者是方,后者是术。
0 有用 gardenhead 2016-12-15 11:02:20
……一页页地神棍起来
0 有用 阿涅 2020-06-29 15:33:04
总觉得anthro的ontological turn相关研究容易出现很微妙的内容x 看上去很绝仔细想想会emmm。但确实好用 害
1 有用 奥博洛莫夫 2019-03-06 12:29:11
"as clear as water and as weighty as gravity", 哈哈,开玩笑,请配合油管上她的采访一起食用,
0 有用 小龙虾 2020-05-26 22:35:04
就是那种框架简直踩在你G点上写、特别适合借鉴引用,但内容毫无实质。听talk卧槽,看完书我艹。
1 有用 倪湛舸 2021-02-03 03:33:19
补一个,如果说修真针对的是biopower,那么盗墓就在engage这个geontopower,前者是方,后者是术。
0 有用 阿涅 2020-06-29 15:33:04
总觉得anthro的ontological turn相关研究容易出现很微妙的内容x 看上去很绝仔细想想会emmm。但确实好用 害
0 有用 小龙虾 2020-05-26 22:35:04
就是那种框架简直踩在你G点上写、特别适合借鉴引用,但内容毫无实质。听talk卧槽,看完书我艹。
0 有用 够诺泰姆突露思 2019-09-12 20:56:07
我翻译地好痛苦,真的,为什么想不开要接这个任务。以后我再也不会在胡塞尔旁边写“翻译你好意思吗?”这种话了,菜鸡何苦笑菜鸡。
1 有用 奥博洛莫夫 2019-03-06 12:29:11
"as clear as water and as weighty as gravity", 哈哈,开玩笑,请配合油管上她的采访一起食用,