Katherine Hayles is known for breaking new ground at the intersection
of the sciences and the humanities. In Unthought,
she once again bridges disciplines by revealing how we think
without thinking—how we use cognitive processes that are inaccessible
to consciousness yet necessary for it to function.
Marshalling fresh insights from neuroscience, cognitive science,
cognitive biology, and literature, Hayles expands our understanding of
cognition and demonstrates that it involves more than consciousness
alone. Cognition, as Hayles defines it, is applicable not only to nonconscious
processes in humans but to all forms of life, including unicellular
organisms and plants. Startlingly, she also shows that cognition
operates in the sophisticated information-processing abilities of technical
systems: when humans and cognitive technical systems interact,
they form “cognitive assemblages”—as found in urban traffic control,
drones, and the trading algorithms of finance capital, for instance—
and these assemblages are transforming life on earth. The result is
what Hayles calls a “planetary cognitive ecology,” which includes both
human and technical actors and which poses urgent questions to humanists
and social scientists alike.
At a time when scientific and technological advances are bringing
far-reaching aspects of cognition into the public eye, Unthought reflects
deeply on our contemporary situation and moves us toward a more
sustainable and flourishing environment for all beings.
5 有用 Ludwigsama 2023-08-05 09:07:31 上海
1,5和6章。很大的一个贡献在于对nonconsious cognition的概念化和对cognitive assemblage讨论。第六章谈了金融资本主义依赖的全球计算和网络系统——然而,美中不足的可能是,hayles并没有进一步将这一金融资本主义所依赖的技术系统与其特定的权力部署联系在一起:计算系统是技术的同时不也恰恰是社会的吗,不正是控制(在德勒兹意义上的)得以可能的基础设施吗?这里可以重新... 1,5和6章。很大的一个贡献在于对nonconsious cognition的概念化和对cognitive assemblage讨论。第六章谈了金融资本主义依赖的全球计算和网络系统——然而,美中不足的可能是,hayles并没有进一步将这一金融资本主义所依赖的技术系统与其特定的权力部署联系在一起:计算系统是技术的同时不也恰恰是社会的吗,不正是控制(在德勒兹意义上的)得以可能的基础设施吗?这里可以重新将galloway(hayles在第五章虽然引用了Galloway,但并没有在这个方向展开思考)带入讨论。而这恰恰是我旨在完成的工作。 (展开)
3 有用 徐苹果 2022-02-15 17:13:54
海姨勇怼披着物质主义外衣的观念论派,怼得头头是道大快人心,然而认知神经科学也不是人文主义的万能良药啊,达玛希奥的漏洞在于对具身的模式化已经背离了具身的语境偶然性
1 有用 陈楸帆 2022-04-16 03:19:04
Thought-provoking, solid, definitely important to the futures we are heading to
0 有用 咳嗽 2023-12-25 07:16:44 美国
读完prologue就到点了,普发cognitive power,Latour actor-network theory cognitive ver.
0 有用 R 2024-03-25 09:56:10 美国
例子很好,但写的浅了