We the Corporations chronicles the revelatory story of one of the most successful, yet least known, “civil rights movements” in American history.
We the Corporations chronicles the astonishing story of one of the most successful yet least well-known “civil rights movements” in American history. Hardly oppressed like women and minorities, business corporations, too, have fought ...
We the Corporations chronicles the revelatory story of one of the most successful, yet least known, “civil rights movements” in American history.
We the Corporations chronicles the astonishing story of one of the most successful yet least well-known “civil rights movements” in American history. Hardly oppressed like women and minorities, business corporations, too, have fought since the nation’s earliest days to gain equal rights under the Constitution―and today have nearly all the same rights as ordinary people.
Exposing the historical origins of Citizens United and Hobby Lobby, Adam Winkler explains how those controversial Supreme Court decisions extending free speech and religious liberty to corporations were the capstone of a centuries-long struggle over corporate personhood and constitutional protections for business. Beginning his account in the colonial era, Winkler reveals the profound influence corporations had on the birth of democracy and on the shape of the Constitution itself. Once the Constitution was ratified, corporations quickly sought to gain the rights it guaranteed. The first Supreme Court case on the rights of corporations was decided in 1809, a half-century before the first comparable cases on the rights of African Americans or women. Ever since, corporations have waged a persistent and remarkably fruitful campaign to win an ever-greater share of individual rights.
Although corporations never marched on Washington, they employed many of the same strategies of more familiar civil rights struggles: civil disobedience, test cases, and novel legal claims made in a purposeful effort to reshape the law. Indeed, corporations have often been unheralded innovators in constitutional law, and several of the individual rights Americans hold most dear were first secured in lawsuits brought by businesses.
Winkler enlivens his narrative with a flair for storytelling and a colorful cast of characters: among others, Daniel Webster, America’s greatest advocate, who argued some of the earliest corporate rights cases on behalf of his business clients; Roger Taney, the reviled Chief Justice, who surprisingly fought to limit protections for corporations―in part to protect slavery; and Roscoe Conkling, a renowned politician who deceived the Supreme Court in a brazen effort to win for corporations the rights added to the Constitution for the freed slaves. Alexander Hamilton, Teddy Roosevelt, Huey Long, Ralph Nader, Louis Brandeis, and even Thurgood Marshall all played starring roles in the story of the corporate rights movement.
In this heated political age, nothing can be timelier than Winkler’s tour de force, which shows how America’s most powerful corporations won our most fundamental rights and turned the Constitution into a weapon to impede the regulation of big business.
作者简介
· · · · · ·
Adam Winkler is a professor at UCLA School of Law, where he specializes in American constitutional law. His scholarship has been cited by the Supreme Court of the United States and his writing has appeared in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, New Republic, Atlantic, Slate, and Scotusblog.
将殖民地的法人特许状视为殖民者与王室之间的契约,更加坐实了议会干预殖民地管理是越界之举的想法。在《独立宣言》宣布所有人都“被造物主赋予了某些不可剥夺的权利”之前的岁月里,殖民者坚称,他们为自己的殖民地制定规章制度的权利不能被剥夺,因为这是当年从国王那里努力争取来的。在1778年的下议院,在这个问题上一言九鼎的威廉·梅雷迪思爵士(Sir William Meredith)是殖民地的支持者,他说:“每一项不可剥夺的权利,其根本都是如此;他如果有能力表达,就去表达;他如果有能力接受,就去接受;一方面是表达,另一方面是接受,…就构成了这样一项权利,而根据英格兰的法律和宪法,这项权利不可剥夺;除非经同意或主动放弃,亦不得废除。” (查看原文)
1 有用 MackAFish 2021-07-10 00:53:55
一本非常翔实的法律史,公司到底是不是人,可不可以拥有言论自由或宗教自由?这样的争议在Citizens Unites和Hobby Lobby之后达到了顶峰。这是过去的200年里公司权力通过高院诉讼不断扩张的后果:从最开始高院严格区分自然人和法人的区别,公司算是(法)人,仅享有受宪法保护的财产权,而不能享受自然人可以拥有的公民权;到后期刺破公司面纱的理论在公司权力诉讼中屡占上风(即公司享有其股东拥有的... 一本非常翔实的法律史,公司到底是不是人,可不可以拥有言论自由或宗教自由?这样的争议在Citizens Unites和Hobby Lobby之后达到了顶峰。这是过去的200年里公司权力通过高院诉讼不断扩张的后果:从最开始高院严格区分自然人和法人的区别,公司算是(法)人,仅享有受宪法保护的财产权,而不能享受自然人可以拥有的公民权;到后期刺破公司面纱的理论在公司权力诉讼中屡占上风(即公司享有其股东拥有的所有财产权,外加公民权)。自由派在这之中又起到了特别重要的作用:为了保护少数族裔的公司不受政策迫害,自由派推进了公司的言论自由(NAACP以第一修正案保护为由拒绝披露成员名单),少数族裔的股东可以把种族身份延伸到公司的种族上,这些都为日后保守派扩张公司权力奠定了法理基础。 (展开)
0 有用 Rilkelee 2019-12-14 17:06:21
3.5. 讲故事为主。。。
0 有用 かんいつ 2018-12-28 00:53:12
我想读这本书 (私人收藏) 2018-05-19
0 有用 某然 2022-09-26 07:42:33 美国
说实话这本阅读门槛还是有一点的,不是常见的轻松科普社科读物。美国建国和公司制的渊源很有趣,公司权利靠着一个个判例逐步成长也是特别有法系特色的发展史。
0 有用 QuietAmbassa 2021-09-21 06:00:58
3.5 对于我这种法律和历史知识一片空白的人听起来比较费劲 but of course I learned something new from it