Long a fruitful area of scrutiny for students of organizations, the study of institutions is undergoing a renaissance in contemporary social science. This volume offers, for the first time, both often-cited foundation works and the latest writings of scholars associated with the "institutional" approach to organization analysis.
In their introduction, the editors discuss poin...
Long a fruitful area of scrutiny for students of organizations, the study of institutions is undergoing a renaissance in contemporary social science. This volume offers, for the first time, both often-cited foundation works and the latest writings of scholars associated with the "institutional" approach to organization analysis.
In their introduction, the editors discuss points of convergence and disagreement with institutionally oriented research in economics and political science, and locate the "institutional" approach in relation to major developments in contemporary sociological theory. Several chapters consolidate the theoretical advances of the past decade, identify and clarify the paradigm's key ambiguities, and push the theoretical agenda in novel ways by developing sophisticated arguments about the linkage between institutional patterns and forms of social structure. The empirical studies that follow--involving such diverse topics as mental health clinics, art museums, large corporations, civil-service systems, and national polities--illustrate the explanatory power of institutional theory in the analysis of organizational change.
Required reading for anyone interested in the sociology of organizations, the volume should appeal to scholars concerned with culture, political institutions, and social change.
Abbott: FOR them the new institutionalism consists of three TURNS:1)away from rational action and utilitarianism; 2)toward social emergentism; 3)toward cognitive and/or cultural explanation.虽然这本书第一章说了...Abbott: FOR them the new institutionalism consists of three TURNS:1)away from rational action and utilitarianism; 2)toward social emergentism; 3)toward cognitive and/or cultural explanation.虽然这本书第一章说了半天NI定义，但后面章节的研究都像是其他领域，研究方法也各样。写得挺好。完全具备芝加哥实用主义制度主义传统。如此看来，新制度主义也没什么激进之处。对待变化与过程的态度不太对劲。他们还将世界视为变量。(展开)
Abbott: FOR them the new institutionalism consists of three TURNS:1)away from rational action and utilitarianism; 2)toward social emergentism; 3)toward cognitive and/or cultural explanation.虽然这本书第一章说了...Abbott: FOR them the new institutionalism consists of three TURNS:1)away from rational action and utilitarianism; 2)toward social emergentism; 3)toward cognitive and/or cultural explanation.虽然这本书第一章说了半天NI定义，但后面章节的研究都像是其他领域，研究方法也各样。写得挺好。完全具备芝加哥实用主义制度主义传统。如此看来，新制度主义也没什么激进之处。对待变化与过程的态度不太对劲。他们还将世界视为变量。(展开)
《社会科学中的研究设计》课上要求精读这两篇，对照一下发现各种白痴错误。 第二章：《制度化的组织》 1. P46，L18： a) 译文：…但这些影响与环绕特定组织的社会行为及社会关系网络所产生的影响… b) 原文：the effects generated by the networks of social behavior and r...
(展开)
Numbei
上海人民出版社2008版
0 有用 野生豆苗 2019-10-09 13:23:48
Great book for the sociological neo-institutionalism
0 有用 ca7thy 2020-03-30 11:40:22
补评 CP exam on institution 读过部分 SI分支
1 有用 飞哆 2021-06-09 08:18:33
Abbott: FOR them the new institutionalism consists of three TURNS:1)away from rational action and utilitarianism; 2)toward social emergentism; 3)toward cognitive and/or cultural explanation.虽然这本书第一章说了... Abbott: FOR them the new institutionalism consists of three TURNS:1)away from rational action and utilitarianism; 2)toward social emergentism; 3)toward cognitive and/or cultural explanation.虽然这本书第一章说了半天NI定义，但后面章节的研究都像是其他领域，研究方法也各样。写得挺好。完全具备芝加哥实用主义制度主义传统。如此看来，新制度主义也没什么激进之处。对待变化与过程的态度不太对劲。他们还将世界视为变量。 (展开)
1 有用 沈玉宁\\\\\ 2014-10-26 08:48:59
在同一领域内不同社会部分的联系/互动增多；在社会部分内部和之间有较明确的权力分布以及“联盟”模式；在此领域内需要处理的信息量增大；在这个领域里的所有社会部分或参与者都自发认为自己处在同一领域内，有实际参与===》组织（organization）产生了。
1 有用 飞哆 2021-06-09 08:18:33
Abbott: FOR them the new institutionalism consists of three TURNS:1)away from rational action and utilitarianism; 2)toward social emergentism; 3)toward cognitive and/or cultural explanation.虽然这本书第一章说了... Abbott: FOR them the new institutionalism consists of three TURNS:1)away from rational action and utilitarianism; 2)toward social emergentism; 3)toward cognitive and/or cultural explanation.虽然这本书第一章说了半天NI定义，但后面章节的研究都像是其他领域，研究方法也各样。写得挺好。完全具备芝加哥实用主义制度主义传统。如此看来，新制度主义也没什么激进之处。对待变化与过程的态度不太对劲。他们还将世界视为变量。 (展开)
0 有用 ca7thy 2020-03-30 11:40:22
补评 CP exam on institution 读过部分 SI分支
0 有用 野生豆苗 2019-10-09 13:23:48
Great book for the sociological neo-institutionalism
1 有用 沈玉宁\\\\\ 2014-10-26 08:48:59
在同一领域内不同社会部分的联系/互动增多；在社会部分内部和之间有较明确的权力分布以及“联盟”模式；在此领域内需要处理的信息量增大；在这个领域里的所有社会部分或参与者都自发认为自己处在同一领域内，有实际参与===》组织（organization）产生了。