First published in 1980, Street-Level Bureaucracy received critical acclaim for its insightful study of how public service workers, in effect, function as policy decision makers, as they wield their considerable discretion in the day-to-day implementation of public programs. Three decades later, the need to bolster the availability and effectiveness of healthcare, social servic...
First published in 1980, Street-Level Bureaucracy received critical acclaim for its insightful study of how public service workers, in effect, function as policy decision makers, as they wield their considerable discretion in the day-to-day implementation of public programs. Three decades later, the need to bolster the availability and effectiveness of healthcare, social services, education, and law enforcement is as urgent as ever. In this thirtieth anniversary expanded edition, Michael Lipsky revisits the territory he mapped out in the first edition to reflect on significant policy developments over the last several decades. Despite the difficulties of managing these front-line workers, he shows how street-level bureaucracies can be and regularly are brought into line with public purposes.
Street-level bureaucrats—from teachers and police officers to social workers and legal-aid lawyers—interact directly with the public and so represent the frontlines of government policy. In Street-Level Bureaucracy, Lipsky argues that these relatively low-level public service employees labor under huge caseloads, ambiguous agency goals, and inadequate resources. When combined with substantial discretionary authority and the requirement to interpret policy on a case-by-case basis, the difference between government policy in theory and policy in practice can be substantial and troubling.
The core dilemma of street-level bureaucrats is that they are supposed to help people or make decisions about them on the basis of individual cases, yet the structure of their jobs makes this impossible. Instead, they are forced to adopt practices such as rationing resources, screening applicants for qualities their organizations favor, “rubberstamping” applications, and routinizing client interactions by imposing the uniformities of mass processing on situations requiring human responsiveness. Occasionally, such strategies work out in favor of the client. But the cumulative effect of street-level decisions made on the basis of routines and simplifications about clients can reroute the intended direction of policy, undermining citizens’ expectations of evenhanded treatment.
This seminal, award-winning study tells a cautionary tale of how decisions made by overburdened workers translate into ad-hoc policy adaptations that impact peoples’ lives and life opportunities. Lipsky maintains, however, that these problems are not insurmountable. Over the years, public managers have developed ways to bring street-level performance more in line with agency goals. This expanded edition of Street-Level Bureaucracy underscores that, despite its challenging nature, street-level work can be made to conform to higher expectations of public service.
作者简介
· · · · · ·
Michael Lipsky is senior program director of Demos, a non-partisan public policy research and advocacy organization, and an affiliate professor at Georgetown University.
虽然是课本,但是读这本书的时候心情很愉悦。因为这本书在public policy这门课里被分到了两个星期读,在另一门课要人一周读完2本300+的书的丧心病狂下衬托的善良无比。 在Public Policy的大框架下面,一个首先最重要的问题就是:How can we know the public and their interest...
(展开)
街头官僚这一概念源自利普斯基(M.Lipsky)。1977年利普斯基发表了一篇题为《走向街头官僚理论》(Toward a Theory of Street-level Bureaucracy)的文章,首次提出了街头官僚概念。在这篇文章的基础上,出版了本书,全面介绍了街头官僚理论。本书在政策研究领域产生了重要影响...
(展开)
0 有用 Goo 2023-11-30 14:34:11 北京
这个领域的开山作
0 有用 猴子雷纳德 2013-04-19 15:22:49
政策学
0 有用 Orchid 2026-08-06 03:14:03 英国
还在脱贫时期的大牛之作
0 有用 s 2022-09-09 06:11:42 美国
非常好的书,有点琐碎但是几乎面面俱到,之前的一些观察都被写出来了,也是有点郁闷……
1 有用 lil梨哩 2021-03-22 13:38:04
有几个点比较喜欢;1 注意到了decentralized org里面的成员的自由裁量很重要(有点inhabited institution那味道)2对state文献的贡献(这个研究中国的state角度非常相似,尤其是对基层官僚discretion的强调,不知道是不是我中国研究看少了,以前都没有注意到有人引)