In this major book, Griselda Pollock engages boldly in the culture wars over 'what is the canon?' and 'what difference can feminism make?' Do we simply reject the all-male line-up and satisfy our need for ideal egos with an all women litany of artistic heroines? Or is the question a chance to resist the phallocentric binary and allow the ambiguities and complexities of desire -...
In this major book, Griselda Pollock engages boldly in the culture wars over 'what is the canon?' and 'what difference can feminism make?' Do we simply reject the all-male line-up and satisfy our need for ideal egos with an all women litany of artistic heroines? Or is the question a chance to resist the phallocentric binary and allow the ambiguities and complexities of desire - subjectivity and sexuality - to shape the readings of art that constantly displace the present gender demarcations?
1 有用 momo 2022-03-12 15:34:27
可以明显看出 Nochlin 和 Pollock 在研究方法上的区别，Pollock 在这本书里明确地提出了自己将马克思与心理分析相结合的方法，两者互相进行补充，
1 有用 momo 2022-03-12 15:34:27
可以明显看出 Nochlin 和 Pollock 在研究方法上的区别，Pollock 在这本书里明确地提出了自己将马克思与心理分析相结合的方法，两者互相进行补充，