This synoptic essay considers the nature and evolution of the Marxist theory that developed in Western Europe, after the defeat of the proletarian rebellions in the West and the isolation of the Russian Revolution in the East in the early 1920s. It focuses particularly on the work of Luk cs, Korsch and Gramsci; Adorno, Marcuse and Benjamin; Sartre and Althusser; and Della Volpe...
This synoptic essay considers the nature and evolution of the Marxist theory that developed in Western Europe, after the defeat of the proletarian rebellions in the West and the isolation of the Russian Revolution in the East in the early 1920s. It focuses particularly on the work of Luk cs, Korsch and Gramsci; Adorno, Marcuse and Benjamin; Sartre and Althusser; and Della Volpe and Colletti, together with other figures within Western Marxism from 1920 to 1975. The theoretical production of each of these thinkers is related simultaneously to the practical fate of working-class struggles and to the cultural mutations of bourgeois thought in their time. The philosophical antecedents of the various school within this tradition--Luk csian, Gramscian, Frankfurt, Sartrean, Althusserian and Della Volpean--are compared, and the specific innovations of their respective systems surveyed. The structural unity of 'Western Marxism', beyond the diversity of its individual thinkers, is then assessed, in a balance-sheet that contrasts its heritage with the tradition of 'classical' Marxism that preceded it, and with the commanding problems which will confront any historical materialism to succeed it.
Perry Anderson is the author of, among other books, Spectrum, Lineages of the Absolutist State, Passages from Antiquity to Feudalism, Considerations on Western Marxism, English Questions, The Origins of Postmodernity, and The New Old World. He teaches history at UCLA and is on the editorial board of New Left Review.
“Marxist theory acquiers its proper contours only in direct relation to a mass revolutionary movement. When the latter is effectively absent or defeated, the former is inevitably deformed or eclipsed....“Marxist theory acquiers its proper contours only in direct relation to a mass revolutionary movement. When the latter is effectively absent or defeated, the former is inevitably deformed or eclipsed.”(展开)
“Marxist theory acquiers its proper contours only in direct relation to a mass revolutionary movement. When the latter is effectively absent or defeated, the former is inevitably deformed or eclipsed....“Marxist theory acquiers its proper contours only in direct relation to a mass revolutionary movement. When the latter is effectively absent or defeated, the former is inevitably deformed or eclipsed.”(展开)
佩里·安德森 作者
Domenico
人民出版社1981版
实践与文本
人民出版社1981版
0 有用 Pavel 2020-02-28 00:10:36
理清西马在整个马克思主义发展位置的第一次尝试，清晰，语言格外优美。最后提出新的左翼革命5个决定条件惊醒梦中人: 革命理论，左翼政党，战斗倾向，联系群众，以及最后也是最关键的，群众本身的革命化。
1 有用 ardor 2011-07-12 18:40:58
是的，Western Marxism的理论家大多都是有钱人出身，，，
0 有用 UnstableOrbits 2022-10-09 22:53:12
“Marxist theory acquiers its proper contours only in direct relation to a mass revolutionary movement. When the latter is effectively absent or defeated, the former is inevitably deformed or eclipsed.... “Marxist theory acquiers its proper contours only in direct relation to a mass revolutionary movement. When the latter is effectively absent or defeated, the former is inevitably deformed or eclipsed.” (展开)
0 有用 寻找哈克贝利芬 2023-11-08 12:31:43 上海
2023-11-08
0 有用 [已注销] 2012-01-19 23:05:08
什么他妈的叫高屋建瓴！
0 有用 寻找哈克贝利芬 2023-11-08 12:31:43 上海
2023-11-08
0 有用 榆杉子 2023-07-28 12:35:27 浙江
写得很清晰，但信息密度确实高，时不时要缓一缓。以及脑内待读书单里可以加上一百本。就我的阅读经验，至少阿尔都塞基本可以躲过所有这些批评
0 有用 chaosmori 2023-06-18 07:31:39 美国
Method as impotence, art as consolation, pessimism as quiescence.
0 有用 UnstableOrbits 2022-10-09 22:53:12
“Marxist theory acquiers its proper contours only in direct relation to a mass revolutionary movement. When the latter is effectively absent or defeated, the former is inevitably deformed or eclipsed.... “Marxist theory acquiers its proper contours only in direct relation to a mass revolutionary movement. When the latter is effectively absent or defeated, the former is inevitably deformed or eclipsed.” (展开)
1 有用 Muraveinik 2021-03-09 14:44:39
本以为是思想史，其实后来才想起来标题说了是评述（consideration）……在东边官僚化，西边革命失败的压力下，逐步学院化的西马。除了葛兰西，安德森基本都持批判态度。最终以托洛茨基的例子为理论与实践的统一，以及马克思主义的政治化和经济化辩护。写作时间很早，所以安德森的想法如今看起来很乐观和天真。不过他提出的几个问题，我觉得是具有现实性的。比如如何想象一种真正的社会主义民主？如何超越现在的代议制... 本以为是思想史，其实后来才想起来标题说了是评述（consideration）……在东边官僚化，西边革命失败的压力下，逐步学院化的西马。除了葛兰西，安德森基本都持批判态度。最终以托洛茨基的例子为理论与实践的统一，以及马克思主义的政治化和经济化辩护。写作时间很早，所以安德森的想法如今看起来很乐观和天真。不过他提出的几个问题，我觉得是具有现实性的。比如如何想象一种真正的社会主义民主？如何超越现在的代议制制度？尤其是到了今天吧。 (展开)