Our competitive, service-oriented societies are taking a toll on the late-modern individual. Rather than improving life, multitasking, "user-friendly" technology, and the culture of convenience are producing disorders that range from depression to attention deficit disorder to borderline personality disorder. Byung-Chul Han interprets the spreading malaise as an inability to ma...
Our competitive, service-oriented societies are taking a toll on the late-modern individual. Rather than improving life, multitasking, "user-friendly" technology, and the culture of convenience are producing disorders that range from depression to attention deficit disorder to borderline personality disorder. Byung-Chul Han interprets the spreading malaise as an inability to manage negative experiences in an age characterized by excessive positivity and the universal availability of people and goods. Stress and exhaustion are not just personal experiences, but social and historical phenomena as well. Denouncing a world in which every against-the-grain response can lead to further disempowerment, he draws on literature, philosophy, and the social and natural sciences to explore the stakes of sacrificing intermittent intellectual reflection for constant neural connection.
Korean-born German philosopher Byung-Chul Han teaches philosophy and cultural studies at Berlin's University of the Arts (UdK). In the past few years, his provocative essays have been translated into numerous languages, and he has become one of the most widely read philosophers in Europe and beyond. His work is presented here in English for the first time.
More like a work of comparative literature study. 韩极力用不到十页的理论挑战重构“晚现代”的权力叙事却矛盾重重,剩下四十页试图绕道拉康福柯又重落他者的窠臼。疑点多于亮点,断论多于逻辑,空中楼阁的理论。世界版的费孝通,哲学版哈拉瑞。尊重地说算是个空想主义学者,不管怎么样都远配不上严肃正统哲学家的帽子。拿着点脑袋一热想出来的理论就开始怼天怼地,真不知道...More like a work of comparative literature study. 韩极力用不到十页的理论挑战重构“晚现代”的权力叙事却矛盾重重,剩下四十页试图绕道拉康福柯又重落他者的窠臼。疑点多于亮点,断论多于逻辑,空中楼阁的理论。世界版的费孝通,哲学版哈拉瑞。尊重地说算是个空想主义学者,不管怎么样都远配不上严肃正统哲学家的帽子。拿着点脑袋一热想出来的理论就开始怼天怼地,真不知道写成这样韩是希望我在地铁上还是在马桶上读。(展开)
0 有用 亚马乌罗提 2024-01-30 16:06:54 福建
比简中译本好些,说起来我确实有考虑加入神经科学背景。。。
1 有用 Shwvejrjej 2019-12-10 14:07:03
PHIL043 selection | Han基本在整合neoliberal ethics对foucauldian disciplinary framework的挑战 然而有些地方将immunology比喻成传统的民族冲突内在的hegelian master/slave dialectics 然后用hybridization描述全球化后现代multiple identities 华丽而不实用的术语... PHIL043 selection | Han基本在整合neoliberal ethics对foucauldian disciplinary framework的挑战 然而有些地方将immunology比喻成传统的民族冲突内在的hegelian master/slave dialectics 然后用hybridization描述全球化后现代multiple identities 华丽而不实用的术语花瓶 (展开)
0 有用 Prunus d 2022-08-22 22:46:16 美国
短书,没有实证,哲学角度,用了免疫的比喻(?)来阐释一个充满了所谓正能量的社会,人们变得越来越内视也越来越空虚,对 positivity 和 achievement 的过度追求却没有一个实在的、有对立面的内核,进而导致了精神上的混乱。中间是与阿甘本、阿伦特、康德和弗洛伊德等人的哲学概念的对话(好吧我不是特别能吃透)。中文版中信的《倦怠社会》。
0 有用 pikapopan 2023-11-11 01:44:00 新加坡
More like a work of comparative literature study. 韩极力用不到十页的理论挑战重构“晚现代”的权力叙事却矛盾重重,剩下四十页试图绕道拉康福柯又重落他者的窠臼。疑点多于亮点,断论多于逻辑,空中楼阁的理论。世界版的费孝通,哲学版哈拉瑞。尊重地说算是个空想主义学者,不管怎么样都远配不上严肃正统哲学家的帽子。拿着点脑袋一热想出来的理论就开始怼天怼地,真不知道... More like a work of comparative literature study. 韩极力用不到十页的理论挑战重构“晚现代”的权力叙事却矛盾重重,剩下四十页试图绕道拉康福柯又重落他者的窠臼。疑点多于亮点,断论多于逻辑,空中楼阁的理论。世界版的费孝通,哲学版哈拉瑞。尊重地说算是个空想主义学者,不管怎么样都远配不上严肃正统哲学家的帽子。拿着点脑袋一热想出来的理论就开始怼天怼地,真不知道写成这样韩是希望我在地铁上还是在马桶上读。 (展开)
1 有用 桃桃煎饼 2022-06-20 07:19:04
非常喜欢这本书理解社会性疲劳与焦虑的视角,拒绝从个体心理角度进行无谓阐发,而是从社会阶段:福柯式监控社会像后现代资本-绩效刺激社会的转变来看。疲劳,焦虑,抑郁,是过度活跃的绩能期待,过度分裂的生活组成,过度耗散的注意力下,没有找到自我的个体们的社会性创伤。
0 有用 LUCIDITY 2024-06-03 11:39:18 美国
捏马读得太快了没咋看懂 记了一大堆笔记 打四星是为看完了的自己感到骄傲🤭
0 有用 Ιάννης Ξενάκης 2024-05-08 23:26:52 广东
难绷
0 有用 💀 2024-05-04 00:51:35 四川
。。。
0 有用 DryHairHeather 2024-04-12 23:48:12 英国
在multitasking中看完了……看完更焦虑了
0 有用 亚马乌罗提 2024-01-30 16:06:54 福建
比简中译本好些,说起来我确实有考虑加入神经科学背景。。。