作者:
Giorgio Agamben 出版社: Stanford University Press 副标题: The Work of Art and the Religion of Capitalism 译者:
Adam Kotsko 出版年: 2019-5-14 页数: 136 定价: GBP 12.59 装帧: Paperback ISBN: 9781503609266
Creation and the giving of orders are closely entwined in Western culture, where God commands the world into existence and later issues the injunctions known as the Ten Commandments. The arche, or origin, is always also a command, and a beginning is always the first principle that governs and decrees. This is as true for theology, where God not only creates the world but govern...
Creation and the giving of orders are closely entwined in Western culture, where God commands the world into existence and later issues the injunctions known as the Ten Commandments. The arche, or origin, is always also a command, and a beginning is always the first principle that governs and decrees. This is as true for theology, where God not only creates the world but governs and continues to govern through continuous creation, as it is for the philosophical and political tradition according to which beginning and creation, command and will, together form a strategic apparatus without which our society would fall apart.
The five essays collected here aim to deactivate this apparatus through a patient archaeological inquiry into the concepts of work, creation, and command. Giorgio Agamben explores every nuance of the arche in search of an an-archic exit strategy. By the book's final chapter, anarchy appears as the secret center of power, brought to light so as to make possible a philosophical thought that might overthrow both the principle and its command.
作者简介
· · · · · ·
Giorgio Agamben is a contemporary Italian philosopher and political theorist whose works have been translated into numerous languages. His most recent title with Stanford University Press is What Is Real? (2018).
Art is only the way in which the anonymous ones we call artists, by maintaining themselves constantly in relation with a practice, seek to constitute their life as form of life: the life of the painter, of the carpenter, of the architect, of the contrabassist, in which, as in every form-of-life, what is in question is nothing less than their happiness. (查看原文)
比较重要的开头三篇读的有点飘。感觉阅读顺序不太对，应该先把这些（《Potentialities : Collected Essays in Philosophy》、《The Use of Bodies : Crossing Aesthetics)》、《The Highest Poverty : Monastic Rules and Form-of-Life》和《The Open : Man and...比较重要的开头三篇读的有点飘。感觉阅读顺序不太对，应该先把这些（《Potentialities : Collected Essays in Philosophy》、《The Use of Bodies : Crossing Aesthetics)》、《The Highest Poverty : Monastic Rules and Form-of-Life》和《The Open : Man and Animal》）先读了再来读的。(展开)
比较重要的开头三篇读的有点飘。感觉阅读顺序不太对，应该先把这些（《Potentialities : Collected Essays in Philosophy》、《The Use of Bodies : Crossing Aesthetics)》、《The Highest Poverty : Monastic Rules and Form-of-Life》和《The Open : Man and...比较重要的开头三篇读的有点飘。感觉阅读顺序不太对，应该先把这些（《Potentialities : Collected Essays in Philosophy》、《The Use of Bodies : Crossing Aesthetics)》、《The Highest Poverty : Monastic Rules and Form-of-Life》和《The Open : Man and Animal》）先读了再来读的。(展开)
2 有用 盗火者Howell 2020-09-06 16:48:44
比较重要的开头三篇读的有点飘。感觉阅读顺序不太对，应该先把这些（《Potentialities : Collected Essays in Philosophy》、《The Use of Bodies : Crossing Aesthetics)》、《The Highest Poverty : Monastic Rules and Form-of-Life》和《The Open : Man and... 比较重要的开头三篇读的有点飘。感觉阅读顺序不太对，应该先把这些（《Potentialities : Collected Essays in Philosophy》、《The Use of Bodies : Crossing Aesthetics)》、《The Highest Poverty : Monastic Rules and Form-of-Life》和《The Open : Man and Animal》）先读了再来读的。 (展开)
3 有用 límpido 2019-07-10 23:02:08
应该是讲稿修改而来，不少内容之前的书都研究过，例如第一篇“艺术作品探原”（《没有内容的人》），第二篇“什么是创造行动”（《意大利范畴》），第三篇“那不可占用的”（《身体的使用》）
1 有用 丁萌 2019-05-25 20:20:23
开头两篇有启发，认为inoperativity是形而上学传统的核心
1 有用 Sadaharu 2019-07-23 20:20:25
对艺术创造的分析蛮有意思，虽然还是用潜能（门槛）那一套
0 有用 Vergängnis 2023-12-14 01:16:29 浙江
如果说阿甘本说当前的艺术境况是创造活动和作品本身让渡至表演的礼仪领域而形成对传统范式的空转，他无疑是我们时代灾难面前最后一位美学家，艺术本身在目的论范式中的自毁，成为美学-伦理的融合，将之作为先锋派范式的终解。但可以说，整个前个体化和人格化的运作在今天社交媒体里都可以模拟，而且得到加倍，让人怀疑无论创造的范畴还是物的对象都显得可笑。潜能的哲学甚至丧失本雅明卡夫卡那的悲怆，纯粹成为个人的礼记。
0 有用 ccsy 2024-05-07 14:15:09 北京
算是阿甘本一些思想的综合简述
0 有用 Vergängnis 2023-12-14 01:16:29 浙江
如果说阿甘本说当前的艺术境况是创造活动和作品本身让渡至表演的礼仪领域而形成对传统范式的空转，他无疑是我们时代灾难面前最后一位美学家，艺术本身在目的论范式中的自毁，成为美学-伦理的融合，将之作为先锋派范式的终解。但可以说，整个前个体化和人格化的运作在今天社交媒体里都可以模拟，而且得到加倍，让人怀疑无论创造的范畴还是物的对象都显得可笑。潜能的哲学甚至丧失本雅明卡夫卡那的悲怆，纯粹成为个人的礼记。
0 有用 养鸡场客卿 2021-04-17 08:53:41
基本的对抗结构仍然保持了
2 有用 盗火者Howell 2020-09-06 16:48:44
比较重要的开头三篇读的有点飘。感觉阅读顺序不太对，应该先把这些（《Potentialities : Collected Essays in Philosophy》、《The Use of Bodies : Crossing Aesthetics)》、《The Highest Poverty : Monastic Rules and Form-of-Life》和《The Open : Man and... 比较重要的开头三篇读的有点飘。感觉阅读顺序不太对，应该先把这些（《Potentialities : Collected Essays in Philosophy》、《The Use of Bodies : Crossing Aesthetics)》、《The Highest Poverty : Monastic Rules and Form-of-Life》和《The Open : Man and Animal》）先读了再来读的。 (展开)
0 有用 Léon 2020-02-01 09:50:24
Agamben已经这么低俗了？看第一章节令我简直不能相信自己的眼睛…