第285页 第四章：长期战争开始

 一处勘误。
Taylor（陶涵）的书中还是对罗斯福总统的助理居里（Lauchlin Currie）的解读充满善意而过于单纯，乃至误以为他只是判断错误： 
Taylor在写本书（原书是https://book.douban.com/subject/3566244/）时“维诺那计划”的文件已经早在1995年解密，美中不足的是在讨论当年负责美国对华政策的这些人时未能参考足够多的解密材料而误以为L.居里只是类似奥威尔式的民主社会主义者（也许是因为他虽然在摆脱费正清史学观但还或多或少受哈佛的历史圈学术传统影响，即无法正视麦卡锡的指控从宏观上问题不大），殊不知居里虽然不是美共成员但的确是彻头彻尾的间谍，参见前美共成员钱伯（Whittaker Chambers）在40年代初和后来在HUAC上的指证https://book.douban.com/annotation/47674852/，可见当年情况比书中描述得更糟。
其中居里的间谍活动包括向莫斯科秘密泄露白宫政治机密和破坏美国援华抗战（另一位奉命阻挠援华资金的是财政部的H.怀特）
居里=柯里=Currie（Lauchlin Currie - Wikipedia），《维诺那计划》首页
Lauchlin Currie
早在抗战时期也参与破坏美国对华经济援助以促成战后远东共运形势，《维诺那计划》第179页谈到： 
 原文对照 
What neither Mrs. Pinchot nor Mrs. Roosevelt knew was that CPUSA controlled the Washington committee for Aid to China. They also did not know until a few days before the concert that only half the funds were go to the Chinese relief ; the rest would go to the National Negro Congress. Communists covertly led the latter organization, and in accordance with the requirements of the Nazi-Soviet Pact it had spent the last year and a half denouncing President Roosevelt in harsh terms.[70] 
When Mrs.Pinchot and Mrs.Roosevelt discovered that they had been misled and manipulated , they demanded that either  the concert go forward as they had been told (all funds to China) or that they not be named as sponsors. At that point Lauchlin Currie, who was a member of the Washington Commitee for Aid to China , intervened and urged the two to avoid controversy and follow half the funds to go to an avowedly anti-Rooselvelt organization. They refused, and issued a public statement withdrawing their sponsorship. That a Roosevelt aide should act in such a manner seems bizarre, unless his secret ties to the CPUSA are understood.[71]  
——英文版https://book.douban.com/subject/2833005/，p.148   
同样，他被确认为间谍也不仅仅在于他破坏美国对中国的援助，而是在于“维诺那计划”查实的线索证实了他和美共间谍网的联系且作为信息源（intelligence source）的代号是“Page”  
He appears in the Venona cables under the cover name 'PAGE', and in Soviet intelligence archives as 'VIM' and as a source for the Golos and Bentley spy networks.[12][13]  According to John Earl Haynes and Harvey Klehr, evidence that Currie cooperated with Soviet espionage is convincing and substantial.[14][15]  Historians Allen Weinstein[16] and Christopher Andrew[17] also conclude Currie was a Soviet asset.（面对硬实的证据，史学界也承认了）
其中《维诺那计划》第176页已经谈到 
看一个罗斯福政府的官员在“苏德互不侵犯条约”签订后是否不再亲苏而站在美国的立场上，这是鉴别此人是一般民主社会主义人士还是共谍的关键所在。