In this age of DNA computers and artificial intelligence, information is becoming disembodied even as the "bodies" that once carried it vanish into virtuality. While some marvel at these changes, envisioning consciousness downloaded into a computer or humans "beamed" Star Trek-style, others view them with horror, seeing monsters brooding in the machines. In How We Became Posthu...
In this age of DNA computers and artificial intelligence, information is becoming disembodied even as the "bodies" that once carried it vanish into virtuality. While some marvel at these changes, envisioning consciousness downloaded into a computer or humans "beamed" Star Trek-style, others view them with horror, seeing monsters brooding in the machines. In How We Became Posthuman, N. Katherine Hayles separates hype from fact, investigating the fate of embodiment in an information age.
Hayles relates three interwoven stories: how information lost its body, that is, how it came to be conceptualized as an entity separate from the material forms that carry it; the cultural and technological construction of the cyborg; and the dismantling of the liberal humanist "subject" in cybernetic discourse, along with the emergence of the "posthuman."
Ranging widely across the history of technology, cultural studies, and literary criticism, Hayles shows what had to be erased, forgotten, and elided to conceive of information as a disembodied entity. Thus she moves from the post-World War II Macy Conferences on cybernetics to the 1952 novel Limbo by cybernetics aficionado Bernard Wolfe; from the concept of self-making to Philip K. Dick's literary explorations of hallucination and reality; and from artificial life to postmodern novels exploring the implications of seeing humans as cybernetic systems.
Although becoming posthuman can be nightmarish, Hayles shows how it can also be liberating. From the birth of cybernetics to artificial life, How We Became Posthuman provides an indispensable account of how we arrived in our virtual age, and of wherewe might go from here.
作者简介
· · · · · ·
Hayles (English, UCLA) investigates the fate of embodiment in an information age. Ranging widely across the history of technology and culture, she relates three interwoven stories: how information came to be conceptualized as an entity separate from material forms; the cultural and technological construction of the cyborg; and the dismantling of the liberal humanist subject in ...
Hayles (English, UCLA) investigates the fate of embodiment in an information age. Ranging widely across the history of technology and culture, she relates three interwoven stories: how information came to be conceptualized as an entity separate from material forms; the cultural and technological construction of the cyborg; and the dismantling of the liberal humanist subject in cybernetic discourse. From the birth of cybernetics to artificial life, she provides an account of how we arrived in our virtual age. Annotation c. Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (booknews.com)
目录
· · · · · ·
Acknowledgments
Prologue
1. Toward Embodied Virtuality
2. Virtual Bodies and Flickering Signifiers
3. Contesting for the Body of Information: The Macy Conferences on Cybernetics
4. Liberal Subjectivity Imperiled: Norbert Wiener and Cybernetic Anxiety
· · · · · ·
(更多)
Acknowledgments
Prologue
1. Toward Embodied Virtuality
2. Virtual Bodies and Flickering Signifiers
3. Contesting for the Body of Information: The Macy Conferences on Cybernetics
4. Liberal Subjectivity Imperiled: Norbert Wiener and Cybernetic Anxiety
5. From Hyphen to Splice: Cybernetics Syntax in Limbo
6. The Second Wave of Cybernetics: From Reflexivity to Self-Organization
7. Turning Reality Inside Out and Right Side Out: Boundary Work in the Mid-Sixties Novels of Philip K. Dick
8. The Materiality of Informatics
9. Narratives of Artificial Life
10. The Semiotics of Virtuality: Mapping the Posthuman
11. Conclusion: What Does It Mean to Be Posthuman?
Notes
Index
· · · · · · (收起)
0 有用 Viraganio 2014-05-18 18:25:21
easy but insightful entry
2 有用 L 2022-01-01 06:39:05
主要读了和控制论的诞生有关的部分。KH指出后人类批判自由主义主体性的同时,在否定身体和具身性上太过绝对,仍然落入柏拉图-笛卡尔的二元论和对理念世界的推崇。所以KH的论述重点是控制论如何被*生产*成一个元学科,通过re-embody控制论本身来re-embody后人类:所谓的控制论革命并不只关乎理念上的革新;它的产生根植于将近二十年的梅西会议、会议中具体的人比如女性打字员,也包含它生产的文字(如宣言... 主要读了和控制论的诞生有关的部分。KH指出后人类批判自由主义主体性的同时,在否定身体和具身性上太过绝对,仍然落入柏拉图-笛卡尔的二元论和对理念世界的推崇。所以KH的论述重点是控制论如何被*生产*成一个元学科,通过re-embody控制论本身来re-embody后人类:所谓的控制论革命并不只关乎理念上的革新;它的产生根植于将近二十年的梅西会议、会议中具体的人比如女性打字员,也包含它生产的文字(如宣言)和修辞过程中对字符的reinscription。KH并非想重树一个原初的、具有某种essence的“人”的身体,而是承认“在场/缺席”到“模式和概率”这个认知转换已经发生,但物质前提对转换来说不可或缺:控制论成为元学科依靠的是身体、历史和文字,信息/模式也无法摆脱它所抽象的物质实体。 (展开)
0 有用 月面的成色 2024-11-07 11:45:55 美国
2020年读的
0 有用 喜鹊叫喳喳 2018-04-16 05:33:44
A marathon read, but every minute is worth it.
16 有用 綦 2010-04-14 05:01:51
放弃托福、雅思、GRE吧,以后流行图灵测试。