Introduction
Richard M. Rorty - Metaphysical Difficulties of Linguistic Philosophy
Part I - Classic Statements of the Thesis That Philosophical Questions Are Questions of Language
1. Moritz Schlick - The Future of Philosophy
2. Rudolf Carnap - On the Character of Philosophical Problems
3. Gustav Bergmann - Logical Positivism, Language, and the Reconstruction of Metaphysics (in part)
4. Rudolf Carnap - Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology
5. Gilbert Ryle - Systematically Misleading Expressions
6. John Wisdom - Philosophical Perplexity
7. Norman Malcolm - Moore and Ordinary Language
Part II - Metaphilosophical Problems of Ideal-Language Philosophy
8a. Irving Copi - Language Analysis and Metaphysical Inquiry
8b. Gustav Bergmann - Two Criteria for an Ideal Language
8c. Irving Copi - Reply to Bergmann
9. Max Black - Russell’s Philosophy of Language (in part)
10a. Alice Ambrose - Linguistic Approaches to Philosophical Problems
10b. Roderick Chisholm Comments on the “Proposal Theory” of Philosophy
11. James W. Cornman - Language and Ontology
12. Willard v. O. Quine - Semantic Ascent (from Word and Object)
Part III - Metaphilosophical Problems of Ordinary-Language Philosophy
13. Roderick Chisholm - Philosophers and Ordinary Language
14. John Passmore - Arguments to Meaninglessness: Excluded Opposites and Paradigm Cases (from Philosophical Reasoning)
15a. Grover Maxwell and Herbert Feigl - Why Ordinary Language Needs Reforming
15b. Manley Thompson - When Is Ordinary Language Reformed?
16a. Richard Hare - Philosophical Discoveries
16b. Paul Henle - Do We Discover Our Uses of Words?
17. Peter Geach - Ascriptivism
18. James W. Cornman - Uses of Language and Philosophical Problems
19. J. O. Urmson - J. L. Austin
20a. Stuart Hampshire - J. L. Austin
20b. J. O. Urmson and G. Warnock - J. L. Austin
20c. Stanley Cavell - Austin at Criticism
21. Stuart Hampshire - The Interpretation of Language; Words and Concepts
Part IV - Recapitulations, Reconsiderations, and Future Prospects
22. Dudley Shapere - Philosophy and the Analysis of Language
23. Stuart Hampshire - Are All Philosophical Questions Questions of Language?
24a. J. O. Urmson - The History of Analysis
24b. Discussion of Urmson’s “The History of Analysis” (by the participants in the 1961 Royaumont Colloquium)
25a. P. F. Strawson - Analysis, Science, and Metaphysics
25b. Discussion of Strawson’s “Analysis, Science and Metaphysics” (by the participants in the 1961 Royaumont Colloquium)
26. Max Black - Language and Reality
27. Jerrold J. Katz - The Philosophical Relevance of Linguistic Theory
28. Yehoshua Bar-Hillel - A Pre-Requisite for Rational Philosophical Discussion
Two Retrospective Essays by Richard M. Rorty
Ten Years After
Twenty-five Years After
Bibliography
· · · · · · (
收起)
1 有用 mina 2021-06-08 01:20:01
我只能说老师找重点的能力太强了,这其实是一本论文集,但只看最后罗蒂写的两篇后记就够了。罗蒂为了强调语言学转向反复拿笛卡尔的理性作对比论证,给人的感觉是美国学者迫切地想要建立一种自我主导的哲学宏观叙事,而对于其真正的合法性,还有待质疑。一直不懂为什么把维特根斯坦作为英美分析哲学的代表,现在看来是他的英文翻译版本带来的巨大冲击,以至于大家都想要把他的观点作为自身发展的根基。分析哲学与语言学的关系,还在... 我只能说老师找重点的能力太强了,这其实是一本论文集,但只看最后罗蒂写的两篇后记就够了。罗蒂为了强调语言学转向反复拿笛卡尔的理性作对比论证,给人的感觉是美国学者迫切地想要建立一种自我主导的哲学宏观叙事,而对于其真正的合法性,还有待质疑。一直不懂为什么把维特根斯坦作为英美分析哲学的代表,现在看来是他的英文翻译版本带来的巨大冲击,以至于大家都想要把他的观点作为自身发展的根基。分析哲学与语言学的关系,还在于英语国家语用学的发展。Its contribution was, to have helped shift from talk about experience as a medium of representation to talk of language as such a medium. (展开)
1 有用 mina 2021-06-08 01:20:01
我只能说老师找重点的能力太强了,这其实是一本论文集,但只看最后罗蒂写的两篇后记就够了。罗蒂为了强调语言学转向反复拿笛卡尔的理性作对比论证,给人的感觉是美国学者迫切地想要建立一种自我主导的哲学宏观叙事,而对于其真正的合法性,还有待质疑。一直不懂为什么把维特根斯坦作为英美分析哲学的代表,现在看来是他的英文翻译版本带来的巨大冲击,以至于大家都想要把他的观点作为自身发展的根基。分析哲学与语言学的关系,还在... 我只能说老师找重点的能力太强了,这其实是一本论文集,但只看最后罗蒂写的两篇后记就够了。罗蒂为了强调语言学转向反复拿笛卡尔的理性作对比论证,给人的感觉是美国学者迫切地想要建立一种自我主导的哲学宏观叙事,而对于其真正的合法性,还有待质疑。一直不懂为什么把维特根斯坦作为英美分析哲学的代表,现在看来是他的英文翻译版本带来的巨大冲击,以至于大家都想要把他的观点作为自身发展的根基。分析哲学与语言学的关系,还在于英语国家语用学的发展。Its contribution was, to have helped shift from talk about experience as a medium of representation to talk of language as such a medium. (展开)