作者:
Soren Kierkegaard
/
Edna H. Hong
/
Howard V. Hong 出版社: Princeton University Press 副标题: Kierkegaard's Writings, Vol 7 出版年: 1985-11-01 页数: 400 定价: USD 26.95 装帧: Paperback ISBN: 9780691020365
This volume contains a new translation, with a historical introduction by the translators, of two works written under the pseudonym Johannes Climacus. Through Climacus, Kierkegaard contrasts the paradoxes of Christianity with Greek and modern philosophical thinking. In Philosophical Fragments he begins with Greek Platonic philosophy, exploring the implications of venturing beyo...
This volume contains a new translation, with a historical introduction by the translators, of two works written under the pseudonym Johannes Climacus. Through Climacus, Kierkegaard contrasts the paradoxes of Christianity with Greek and modern philosophical thinking. In Philosophical Fragments he begins with Greek Platonic philosophy, exploring the implications of venturing beyond the Socratic understanding of truth acquired through recollection to the Christian experience of acquiring truth through grace. Published in 1844 and not originally planned to appear under the pseudonym Climacus, the book varies in tone and substance from the other works so attributed, but it is dialectically related to them, as well as to the other pseudonymous writings. The central issue of Johannes Climacus is doubt. Probably written between November 1842 and April 1843 but unfinished and published only posthumously, this book was described by Kierkegaard as an attack on modern speculative philosophy by "means of the melancholy irony, which did not consist in any single utterance on the part of Johannes Climacus but in his whole life...Johannes does what we are told to do - he actually doubts everything - he suffers through all the pain of doing that, becomes cunning, almost acquires a bad conscience. When he has gone as far in that direction as he can go and wants to come back, he cannot do so...Now he despairs, his life is wasted, his youth is spent in these deliberations. Life does not acquire any meaning for him, and all this is the fault of philosophy." A note by Kierkegaard suggests how he might have finished the work: "Doubt is conquered not by the system but by faith, just as it is faith that has brought doubt into the world!."
the single best PHILOSOPHICAL commentary on Plato's (in)famous "knowledge is recollection" claim: notices its coherence with Socrates' way of life and the denial of history it presupposes or entails.
仅Philosophical fragment，本来记得成为主体是这本里的所以重读了这本，结果发现并不是，但哈姆雷特辩证法那一部分还是挺有帮助的；结尾提到的悬置判断让我觉得SK生存哲学和现象学的关系也很有意思。阿甘本的同时代人应该就是被最后一部分启发而来的，那同时代的人与最后一代的人其实殊无相异之处，而倘若其中有人理解了自身，他就应该希望同时代性以神的受难而终结。在克尔凯郭尔，信仰永远是悖理的，与...仅Philosophical fragment，本来记得成为主体是这本里的所以重读了这本，结果发现并不是，但哈姆雷特辩证法那一部分还是挺有帮助的；结尾提到的悬置判断让我觉得SK生存哲学和现象学的关系也很有意思。阿甘本的同时代人应该就是被最后一部分启发而来的，那同时代的人与最后一代的人其实殊无相异之处，而倘若其中有人理解了自身，他就应该希望同时代性以神的受难而终结。在克尔凯郭尔，信仰永远是悖理的，与悖论密不可分，同时又是奇迹，是需要被意识到的恩典，然而在这个神面前人永远有罪，永远是错的，在造物和神之间任何形式的平等都绝无可能存在，他的神确实曾在，昔在，永在，然而却外在于论证与人类的理解能力。Alas, I accept it not.(展开)
![[丹麦] 索伦·克尔凯郭尔](https://img1.doubanio.com/img/author/medium/public/1500774864.78.jpg)
索伦·克尔凯郭尔 作者
江绪林
商务印书馆2012版
哲夫成城
商务印书馆2012版
理一分殊
中国社会科学出版社2013版
Alucia
中国社会科学出版社2013版
南极旅行家
商务印书馆2012版
0 有用 Caesura 2012-11-02 11:39:04
非常感染人的reading！齐克果是目前我读过最有passion的哲学家
0 有用 ae 2011-10-20 15:01:33
philosophical fragments
0 有用 Q 2011-12-27 02:07:56
the single best PHILOSOPHICAL commentary on Plato's (in)famous "knowledge is recollection" claim: notices its coherence with Socrates' way of life and the denial of history it presupposes or entails.
0 有用 KryseScalpel 2022-10-19 01:44:32 爱尔兰
仅Philosophical fragment，本来记得成为主体是这本里的所以重读了这本，结果发现并不是，但哈姆雷特辩证法那一部分还是挺有帮助的；结尾提到的悬置判断让我觉得SK生存哲学和现象学的关系也很有意思。阿甘本的同时代人应该就是被最后一部分启发而来的，那同时代的人与最后一代的人其实殊无相异之处，而倘若其中有人理解了自身，他就应该希望同时代性以神的受难而终结。在克尔凯郭尔，信仰永远是悖理的，与... 仅Philosophical fragment，本来记得成为主体是这本里的所以重读了这本，结果发现并不是，但哈姆雷特辩证法那一部分还是挺有帮助的；结尾提到的悬置判断让我觉得SK生存哲学和现象学的关系也很有意思。阿甘本的同时代人应该就是被最后一部分启发而来的，那同时代的人与最后一代的人其实殊无相异之处，而倘若其中有人理解了自身，他就应该希望同时代性以神的受难而终结。在克尔凯郭尔，信仰永远是悖理的，与悖论密不可分，同时又是奇迹，是需要被意识到的恩典，然而在这个神面前人永远有罪，永远是错的，在造物和神之间任何形式的平等都绝无可能存在，他的神确实曾在，昔在，永在，然而却外在于论证与人类的理解能力。Alas, I accept it not. (展开)
0 有用 无脚鸟 2014-01-08 11:30:35
A book that changed my life attitude.