出版社: Cambridge University Press
副标题: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China
出版年: 1979-2-28
页数: 420
定价: USD 44.99
装帧: Paperback
ISBN: 9780521294997
内容简介 · · · · · ·
This is a 1979 book by political scientist and sociologist Theda Skocpol, published by Cambridge University Press and explaining the causes of revolutions through the structural functionalism sociological paradigm comparative historical analysis of the French Revolution of 1787 through the early 19th century French Revolution, the Russian Revolution of 1917 through the 1930s Ru...
This is a 1979 book by political scientist and sociologist Theda Skocpol, published by Cambridge University Press and explaining the causes of revolutions through the structural functionalism sociological paradigm comparative historical analysis of the French Revolution of 1787 through the early 19th century French Revolution, the Russian Revolution of 1917 through the 1930s Russian Revolution and the Chinese Revolution of 1911 through the 1960s Cultural Revolution. Skocpol argues that these three cases, despite being spread over a century and a half, are similar in the sense that all three were Social Revolutions
Skocpol asserts that Social Revolutions are rapid and basic transformations of a society's state and class structures. This is different from, for example, a mere 'rebellion' which merely involves a revolt of subordinate classes but may not create structural change and from a Political Revolution that may change state structures but not social structures. Industrialization can transform social structure but not change the political structure. What is unique about Social Revolutions, she says, is that basic changes in social structure and political structure occur in a mutually reinforcing fashion and these changes occur through intense sociopolitical conflict.
States and Social Revolutions的创作者
· · · · · ·
-
西达·斯考切波 作者
作者简介 · · · · · ·
THEDA SKOCPOL (PhD, Harvard, 1975) is the Victor S. Thomas Professor of Government and Sociology at Harvard University. At Harvard, she has served as Dean of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences (2005-2007) and as Director of the Center for American Political Studies (2000-2006). In 1996, Skocpol served as President of the Social Science History Association, an interdiscipl...
THEDA SKOCPOL (PhD, Harvard, 1975) is the Victor S. Thomas Professor of Government and Sociology at Harvard University. At Harvard, she has served as Dean of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences (2005-2007) and as Director of the Center for American Political Studies (2000-2006). In 1996, Skocpol served as President of the Social Science History Association, an interdisciplinary professional group, and in 2002-03, she served as President of the American Political Science Association during the centennial of this leading professional body. In 2007, she was awarded the Johan Skytte Prize in Political Science for her "visionary analysis of the significance of the state for revolutions, welfare, and political trust, pursued with theoretical depth and empirical evidence." The Skytte Prize is one of the largest and most prestigious in political science and is awarded annually by the Skytte Foundation at Uppsala University (Sweden) to the scholar who in the view of the foundation has made the most valuable contribution to the discipline. Skocpol has also been elected to membership in all three major U.S. interdisciplinary honor societies: the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (elected 1994), the American Philosophical Society (elected 2006), and the National Academy of Sciences (elected 2008).
Skocpol's work covers an unusually broad spectrum of topics including both comparative politics (States and Social Revolutions, 1979) and American politics (Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States, 1992). Among her other works are Bringing the State Back In (1985, with Peter Evans and Dietrich Rueschemeyer); Social Policy in the United States (1995); Boomerang: Clinton's Health Security Effort and the Turn Against Government in US Politics (1996); Civic Engagement in American Democracy (1999, with Morris Fiorina); Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life (2003); Inequality and American Democracy: What We Know and What We Need to Learn (2005, with Lawrence R. Jacobs); What a Mighty Power We Can Be: African American Fraternal Groups and The Struggle for Racial Equality (2006, with Ariane Liazos and Marshall Ganz); and The Transformation of American Politics: Activist Government and the Rise of Conservatism (2007, with Paul Pierson). Her books and articles have been widely cited in political science literature and have won numerous awards, including the 1993 Woodrow Wilson Award of the American Political Science Association for the best book in political science for the previous year. Skocpol's research focuses on U.S. social policy and civic engagement in American democracy, including changes since the 1960s. She has recently launched new projects on the development of U.S. higher education and on the transformations of U.S. federal policies in the Obama era.
喜欢读"States and Social Revolutions"的人也喜欢 · · · · · ·
States and Social Revolutions的书评 · · · · · · ( 全部 45 条 )

危机中的变革——从国家中心主义理解革命

重读《国家与社会革命》——对凝固历史观和中国社会革命的反思

读书笔记:国家与社会革命
这篇书评可能有关键情节透露
政治学微博读书会的阅读书目,下面是笔记跟作业。直接发有“被禁止的内容”,只好先处理啦。 书名:国家与社会革命—对法国、俄国和中国的比较分析 作者:(美)西达.斯考切波(Theda Skocpol) 译者:何俊志 王学东 出版者:上海人民出版社 版次:2007年3月上海第一版第一次印刷... (展开)
观念、国家与社会革命
这篇书评可能有关键情节透露
美国女学者斯考切波的《国家与社会革命》运用了比较历史学方法,通过对比法国、俄国和中国的社会革命,归纳出三国革命中的共同点,以此来解释社会革命爆发的原因和革命最终的成果。本书主要批判了马克思主义学者所主张的“阶级统治”与“阶级利益”学说。此外,斯考切波也对前... (展开)
> 更多书评 45篇
论坛 · · · · · ·
在这本书的论坛里发言这本书的其他版本 · · · · · · ( 全部7 )
-
上海人民出版社 (2013)8.9分 201人读过
-
上海人民出版社 (2007)8.4分 1165人读过
-
上海人民出版社 (2015)8.6分 163人读过
-
桂冠圖書 (1998)9.1分 58人读过
以下书单推荐 · · · · · · ( 全部 )
- 新课bibliography (醒了)
- Social Change (苍麒麟)
- 李红涛老师的传播学书目推荐 (蛋蛋姐)
- C. Wright Mills Award (Blade King)
- Essential Readings in Historical Sociology (Etranger)
谁读这本书? · · · · · ·
二手市场
· · · · · ·
订阅关于States and Social Revolutions的评论:
feed: rss 2.0
0 有用 象 2011-12-19 05:10:50
这学期的三个大主题就social revolution我学的最好啦~~~
1 有用 V 2016-03-01 09:45:01
深入浅出,清晰全面而有力。虽然方法上有些问题。
0 有用 ca7thy 2017-11-16 13:37:42
花很多精力读完; very ambitious; justify comparison by defining social revolutions, by taking a non-voluntarist, structural perspective, and most importantly, seeing the state as an autonomous structure; beca... 花很多精力读完; very ambitious; justify comparison by defining social revolutions, by taking a non-voluntarist, structural perspective, and most importantly, seeing the state as an autonomous structure; because of these, three revolutions, their causes and outcomes can be compared. political crises+peasant revolts-->more centralized, bureaucratic state. (展开)
0 有用 Mel. 2015-05-13 00:38:40
T-T
0 有用 暮色·朝阳 2018-09-25 23:22:45
我觉得嘛,就是胡扯(一个个人偏见,不一定对(一定对))