Ambitious and elegant, this book builds a bridge between evolutionary theory and cultural psychology. Michael Tomasello is one of the very few people to have done systematic research on the cognitive capacities of both nonhuman primates and human children. The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition identifies what the differences are, and suggests where they might have come from. </p>
Tomasello argues that the roots of the human capacity for symbol-based culture, and the kind of psychological development that takes place within it, are based in a cluster of uniquely human cognitive capacities that emerge early in human ontogeny. These include capacities for sharing attention with other persons; for understanding that others have intentions of their own; and for imitating, not just what someone else does, but what someone else has intended to do. In his discussions of language, symbolic representation, and cognitive development, Tomasello describes with authority and ingenuity the "ratchet effect" of these capacities working over evolutionary and historical time to create the kind of cultural artifacts and settings within which each new generation of children develops. He also proposes a novel hypothesis, based on processes of social cognition and cultural evolution, about what makes the cognitive representations of humans different from those of other primates. </p>
Lucid, erudite, and passionate, The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition will be essential reading for developmental psychology, animal behavior, and cultural psychology. </p>
0 有用 . 2017-12-07 10:50:01
这部书断断续续利用闲暇时间看完。前三章非常精彩,最后的结尾也不错,中间进入语言分析的部分太过于枯燥和局限于英语了。作者很多地方都在尽力回应哲学家们的思考,比如维特根斯坦;让人也有心理学家比如维果斯基。
0 有用 Apophenia 2011-04-15 05:59:02
推荐给喜欢Vygotsky&Wittgenstein&Searle,关注思维和语言关系,及发展、文化、比较、语言心理学的同学。
0 有用 sonatanegra 2015-09-11 23:38:20
interesting hypothesis on the humanique cognitive ability, i.e. the capacity to recognize intentionality. still unclear on whether Tomasello implies that the capacity to recognize intentionality presu... interesting hypothesis on the humanique cognitive ability, i.e. the capacity to recognize intentionality. still unclear on whether Tomasello implies that the capacity to recognize intentionality presupposes linguistic capacity, whether this single capacity is sufficient, etc. (展开)
0 有用 asisi 2012-12-04 07:03:17
大猩猩和人。。。
0 有用 方觉夏深 2013-10-28 08:29:35
煽动性大于说服性;好不习惯看见作者不断地cite自己