What does it mean to be truthful? What role does truth play in our lives? What do we lose if we reject truthfulness? No philosopher is better suited to answer these questions than Bernard Williams. Writing with his characteristic combination of passion and elegant simplicity, he explores the value of truth and finds it to be both less and more than we might imagine. Modern cult...
What does it mean to be truthful? What role does truth play in our lives? What do we lose if we reject truthfulness? No philosopher is better suited to answer these questions than Bernard Williams. Writing with his characteristic combination of passion and elegant simplicity, he explores the value of truth and finds it to be both less and more than we might imagine. Modern culture exhibits two attitudes toward truth: suspicion of being deceived (no one wants to be fooled) and skepticism that objective truth exists at all (no one wants to be naive). This tension between a demand for truthfulness and the doubt that there is any truth to be found is not an abstract paradox. It has political consequences and signals a danger that our intellectual activities, particularly in the humanities, may tear themselves to pieces. Williams's approach, in the tradition of Nietzsche's genealogy, blends philosophy, history, and a fictional account of how the human concern with truth might have arisen. Without denying that we should worry about the contingency of much that we take for granted, he defends truth as an intellectual objective and a cultural value. He identifies two basic virtues of truth, Accuracy and Sincerity, the first of which aims at finding out the truth and the second at telling it. He describes different psychological and social forms that these virtues have taken and asks what ideas can make best sense of them today. "Truth and Truthfulness" presents a powerful challenge to the fashionable belief that truth has no value, but equally to the traditional faith that its value guarantees itself. Bernard Williams shows us that when we lose a sense of the value of truth, we lose a lot both politically and personally, and may well lose everything.
尤其就信念而论,不能简单地说:如果一个人的信念经常发生变化,那么他似乎就是不一致的,或矛盾的,或不可救药;而是,如果信念出于内在的理由而频繁变化,那么它们就不是信念,而是某种类似于命题性思想倾向(mood)的东西。【mood不应该被翻译为倾向吧?之前还看到把turns of thought也翻译成倾向】
(查看原文)
Williams在这个project里想要的大概是走一条中庸之路:他既瞧不上柏拉图-康德一脉的理性主义,又厌憎Rorty和法国后现代思想家们(比如德里达)的怀疑主义,所以一边坚持着all concepts and normativity are social,一边寻找objectivity。任务注定艰难,但作为全英国近五十年里最好的哲人,他做得还是蛮漂亮 — 而且极具启发性。
2 有用 nous 2013-09-20 21:06:41
没看懂。。。
1 有用 chinchin 2011-04-09 19:33:30
williams当然是听好的 哈哈
1 有用 申不变 2021-05-27 20:35:13
Williams在这个project里想要的大概是走一条中庸之路:他既瞧不上柏拉图-康德一脉的理性主义,又厌憎Rorty和法国后现代思想家们(比如德里达)的怀疑主义,所以一边坚持着all concepts and normativity are social,一边寻找objectivity。任务注定艰难,但作为全英国近五十年里最好的哲人,他做得还是蛮漂亮 — 而且极具启发性。
0 有用 兔豹宝 2020-05-10 17:18:45
已弃,看不懂
0 有用 🔒 2021-04-06 17:29:29
audible听完