作者:
Svetlana Alpers 出版社: University Of Chicago Press 副标题: Dutch Art in the Seventeenth Century 出版年: 1984-04-15 页数: 302 定价: USD 32.50 装帧: Paperback ISBN: 9780226015132
"The art historian after Erwin Panofsky and Ernst Gombrich is not only participating in an activity of great intellectual excitement; he is raising and exploring issues which lie very much at the centre of psychology, of the sciences and of history itself. Svetlana Alpers's study of 17th-century Dutch painting is a splendid example of this excitement and of the centrality of ar...
"The art historian after Erwin Panofsky and Ernst Gombrich is not only participating in an activity of great intellectual excitement; he is raising and exploring issues which lie very much at the centre of psychology, of the sciences and of history itself. Svetlana Alpers's study of 17th-century Dutch painting is a splendid example of this excitement and of the centrality of art history among current disciples. Professor Alpers puts forward a vividly argued thesis. There is, she says, a truly fundamental dichotomy between the art of the Italian Renaissance and that of the Dutch masters. . . . Italian art is the primary expression of a 'textual culture, ' this is to say of a culture which seeks emblematic, allegorical or philosophical meanings in a serious painting. Alberti, Vasari and the many other theoreticians of the Italian Renaissance teach us to 'read' a painting, and to read it in depth so as to elicit and construe its several levels of signification. The world of Dutch art, by the contrast, arises from and enacts a truly 'visual culture.' It serves and energises a system of values in which meaning is not 'read' but 'seen, ' in which new knowledge is visually recorded."--George Steiner, "Sunday Times"
"There is no doubt that thanks to Alpers's highly original book the study of the Dutch masters of the seventeenth century will be thoroughly reformed and rejuvenated. . . . She herself has the verve, the knowledge, and the sensitivity to make us see familiar sights in a new light."--E. H. Gombrich, "New York Review of Books"
目录
· · · · · ·
List of Illustrations
Preface
Introduction
1. Constantijn Huygens and The New World
2. "Ut pictura, ita visio": Kepler’s Model of the Eye and the Nature of Picturing in the North
3. "With a Sincere Hand and a Faithful Eye": The Craft of Representation
· · · · · ·
(更多)
List of Illustrations
Preface
Introduction
1. Constantijn Huygens and The New World
2. "Ut pictura, ita visio": Kepler’s Model of the Eye and the Nature of Picturing in the North
3. "With a Sincere Hand and a Faithful Eye": The Craft of Representation
4. The Mapping Impulse in Dutch Art
5. Looking at Words: The Representation of Texts in Dutch Art
Epilogue: Vermeer and Rembrandt
Appendix: On the Emblematic Interpretation of Dutch Art
Notes
Index
· · · · · · (收起)
Let us propose that the empirically based pursuit of natural knowledge, for which Huygens opts, contrasts with the classical, mathematically based studies, even as the craft concerns of Dutch artists do with the aims and ideals of high art. (查看原文)
苦影
商务印书馆2021版
哲夫成城
商务印书馆2021版
1 有用 malingcat 2014-12-18 21:18:21
是有关17世纪荷兰艺术的重要著作。从几个角度围攻荷兰绘画的“describing”性质，以与意大利文艺复兴相区别，有些道理，但是，似乎也不能一概而论。看过作者的另一本Rembrandt's Enterprise，她还写过委拉斯凯兹、鲁本斯。有空找来看。
0 有用 鄭巨源 2023-07-24 23:22:31 浙江
选用的材料虽有刻意片面之嫌，但以一己之力，独辟一种考察北方艺术的新路径，实在有气魄。文笔亦极佳。
0 有用 闻朵 2018-03-17 04:41:05
Groundbreaking
1 有用 小红帽 2010-09-07 07:13:08
Brave and provocative. Learn how to make a strong argument without stretching oneself. Plus the illustrations are so beautiful.
0 有用 puzzled歐 2018-02-13 17:07:03
读得有点吃力，确实如作者自己标榜的那样，这是《词与物》在古典知识型框架下的视觉文化考古。克拉里那本《观察者的技术》直接的修正带对象就是本书限定性的观点，不过比起克拉里，Alpers考察的范围更广，而且艺术史的味道多多少少更浓重点
0 有用 鄭巨源 2023-07-24 23:22:31 浙江
选用的材料虽有刻意片面之嫌，但以一己之力，独辟一种考察北方艺术的新路径，实在有气魄。文笔亦极佳。
0 有用 Become a lake 2020-02-16 19:58:52
从阿尔贝蒂的透视到潘诺夫斯基的图像学，除了意大利模式以外，艺术史是否还有其他的书写可能？置于这样的学术史脉络中，方才理解作者的勇气，尽管在细节方面会有框架先行之感，但是，不能否认它的意义。
0 有用 闻朵 2018-03-17 04:41:05
Groundbreaking
0 有用 puzzled歐 2018-02-13 17:07:03
读得有点吃力，确实如作者自己标榜的那样，这是《词与物》在古典知识型框架下的视觉文化考古。克拉里那本《观察者的技术》直接的修正带对象就是本书限定性的观点，不过比起克拉里，Alpers考察的范围更广，而且艺术史的味道多多少少更浓重点
0 有用 谁也不能发现我 2016-02-01 14:30:13
太难看了忍不住吐槽 文科教授的通病就是爱跑题和爱炫耀吧