Preface and Acknowledgments
Making Sense of the Civic Engagement Debate Theda Skocpol
Morris P. Fiorina PART ONE Between State and Society: Roots of
American Civic Engagement
How Americans Became Civic Theda Skocpol
Marshall Ganz
· · · · · ·
(
更多)
Preface and Acknowledgments
Making Sense of the Civic Engagement Debate Theda Skocpol
Morris P. Fiorina PART ONE Between State and Society: Roots of
American Civic Engagement
How Americans Became Civic Theda Skocpol
Marshall Ganz
Ziad Munson
Bayliss Camp
Michele Swers Jennifer Oser
Organizational Repertoires and Institutional
Change: Women's Groups and the Transformation
of American Politics,
Elisabeth S. Clemens
National Elections as Institutions for
Generating Social Capital
Wendy M. Rahn John Brehm
Neil Carlson
PART TWO Civic Life in a Changing Society
Professions and Civic Engagement: Trends in
Rhetoric and Practice, Steven Brint
Charles S. Levy
Vital Signs: Organizational Population Trends
and Civic Engagement in New Have,
Connecticut,
Peter Dobkin Hall
Social Change and Civic Engagement: The Case of the PTA
Susan Crawford
Peggy Levitt
Technological Change and Associational Life
Marcella Ridlen Ray
Mobilizing Civic Engagement: The Changing
Impact of Religious Involvement Robert Wuthnow
PART THREE The Ironies of Contemporary Activism
The Rise of Citizen Groups
Jeffrey M. Berry
Extreme Voices: A Dark Side of Civic Engagement
Morris P. Fiorina
Civic Participation and the Equality Problem
Kay Lehman Schlozman
Sidney Verba Henry E. Brady
Advocates without Members: The Recent
Transformation of American Civic Life Theda Skocpol
Contributors
Index
· · · · · · (
收起)
0 有用 周沐君 2011-03-30 14:55:51
我已然是comparativist in mind了,看到这种拿美国一个国家的公民社会团体在理性选择、社会资本、历史制度主义几个大筐里跳来跳去地说事的书,终究觉得不够给力。
0 有用 江离载菁 2019-01-29 16:41:01
很多议题,要和美国政治发展学派的思路放在一起看,才觉得有意思
0 有用 西西弗斯的石头 2016-12-30 10:14:28
只看了introduction一章,论述到研究civic engagement的三个视角:理性选择、社会资本和历史制度主义,觉得还蛮有意思的。尤其是skocpol的研究,讲述美国大的倡导团体(advocacy group)的盛行在一定程度上挤压了civic engagement的空间。
0 有用 江离载菁 2019-01-29 16:41:01
很多议题,要和美国政治发展学派的思路放在一起看,才觉得有意思
0 有用 西西弗斯的石头 2016-12-30 10:14:28
只看了introduction一章,论述到研究civic engagement的三个视角:理性选择、社会资本和历史制度主义,觉得还蛮有意思的。尤其是skocpol的研究,讲述美国大的倡导团体(advocacy group)的盛行在一定程度上挤压了civic engagement的空间。
0 有用 周沐君 2011-03-30 14:55:51
我已然是comparativist in mind了,看到这种拿美国一个国家的公民社会团体在理性选择、社会资本、历史制度主义几个大筐里跳来跳去地说事的书,终究觉得不够给力。