Part I Preliminaries
1 Orientation 3
1.1 Grammar and Life 3
1.2 The Nature of the Beast 5
1.3 Grammar as Symbolization 14
2 Conceptual Semantics 27
2.1 Meaning and Semantic Representations 27
2.2 Conceptual Content 43
3 Construal 55
3.1 Specifi city 55
3.2 Focusing 57
3.3 Prominence 66
3.4 Perspective 73
3.5 Evidence for Semantic Claims 85
Part II Fundamentals
4 Grammatical Classes 93
4.1 Are Conceptual Characterizations Conceivable? 93
4.2 Nouns and Verbs 103
4.3 Classes of Relational Expressions 112
5 Major Subclasses 128
5.1 Count and Mass Nouns 128
5.2 Perfective and Imperfective Verbs 147
6 Constructions: General Characterization 161
6.1 Symbolic Assemblies 161
6.2 Constructional Schemas 167
6.3 Unipolar vs. Bipolar Organization 174
7 Constructions: Descriptive Factors 183
7.1 Correspondences 183
7.2 Profi le Determinance 192
7.3 Elaboration 198
7.4 Constituency 205
8 Rules and Restrictions 215
8.1 Networks and Schemas 215
8.2 Assessing Conventionality 227
8.3 Networks of Constructions 237
8.4 Regularity 244
Part III Structures
9 Grounding 259
9.1 Subjective and Objective Construal 260
9.2 Type vs. Instance 264
9.3 Nominal Grounding 272
9.4 Clausal Grounding 296
10 Nominal Structure 310
10.1 Structure and Function 310
10.2 Noun Modifi ers 318
10.3 Classifi cation and Quantifi cation 334
10.4 Infl ection and Agreement 346
11 Clause Structure 354
11.1 Global Organization 354
11.2 Subject and Object 363
11.3 Clause Types 382
11.4 Complex Verbs 400
12 Complex Sentences 406
12.1 Ordination: Co- and Sub- 406
12.2 Clausal Connections 419
12.3 Finite Complements 437
Part IV Frontiers
13 Discourse 457
13.1 The Basis of Language Structure 457
13.2 Conceptual Substrate 463
13.3 Discourse Genres 477
13.4 Structure Building 486
14 Engaging the World 500
14.1 Dynamicity 500
14.2 Fictivity 524
14.3 Simulation and Subjectifi cation 535
14.4 Mind, Meaning, and Grammar 539
References 541
· · · · · · (
收起)
2 有用 sirius_flower 2014-06-28 13:21:51
Langacker这本书涉及到了很多之前没有细讲的细节问题,其中有一些细节思考甚至已经带有了意识哲学的味道,很有意思。点赞
0 有用 HY 2013-11-30 23:49:06
A Basic Introduction和Investigations相比,似乎后者更加有趣,前者介绍旧有理论的内容居多。
1 有用 Xavierum 2020-02-13 21:25:09
基本上把每个语法范畴都用一套统一的几何形态来给图解了。那一幅幅图式(schema)实在太本质、太优雅了,不就是帕拉图「理型」的语言学示范吗?图解了N多语言教学和本体学的棘手难题。居然把可数名词和不可数名词类比成动词完成体和动词非完成体,这个元隐喻让我元高潮。可数和完成体=有界,不可数和非完成体=无界。I luv sucking cock-nitive grammar 👄🍆💦这本introducti... 基本上把每个语法范畴都用一套统一的几何形态来给图解了。那一幅幅图式(schema)实在太本质、太优雅了,不就是帕拉图「理型」的语言学示范吗?图解了N多语言教学和本体学的棘手难题。居然把可数名词和不可数名词类比成动词完成体和动词非完成体,这个元隐喻让我元高潮。可数和完成体=有界,不可数和非完成体=无界。I luv sucking cock-nitive grammar 👄🍆💦这本introduction版貌似是foundation版volume 1+ volume 2的整合版。 (展开)
0 有用 Anchi_Re 2016-02-21 09:36:02
识别的语法
1 有用 Xavierum 2020-02-13 21:25:09
基本上把每个语法范畴都用一套统一的几何形态来给图解了。那一幅幅图式(schema)实在太本质、太优雅了,不就是帕拉图「理型」的语言学示范吗?图解了N多语言教学和本体学的棘手难题。居然把可数名词和不可数名词类比成动词完成体和动词非完成体,这个元隐喻让我元高潮。可数和完成体=有界,不可数和非完成体=无界。I luv sucking cock-nitive grammar 👄🍆💦这本introducti... 基本上把每个语法范畴都用一套统一的几何形态来给图解了。那一幅幅图式(schema)实在太本质、太优雅了,不就是帕拉图「理型」的语言学示范吗?图解了N多语言教学和本体学的棘手难题。居然把可数名词和不可数名词类比成动词完成体和动词非完成体,这个元隐喻让我元高潮。可数和完成体=有界,不可数和非完成体=无界。I luv sucking cock-nitive grammar 👄🍆💦这本introduction版貌似是foundation版volume 1+ volume 2的整合版。 (展开)
0 有用 Anchi_Re 2016-02-21 09:36:02
识别的语法
2 有用 sirius_flower 2014-06-28 13:21:51
Langacker这本书涉及到了很多之前没有细讲的细节问题,其中有一些细节思考甚至已经带有了意识哲学的味道,很有意思。点赞
0 有用 HY 2013-11-30 23:49:06
A Basic Introduction和Investigations相比,似乎后者更加有趣,前者介绍旧有理论的内容居多。