出版社: Stanford University Press
副标题: Representation and Practice in the Qing
出版年: 1996
页数: 288
定价: GBP 58.50
装帧: Hardcover
ISBN: 9780804727402
内容简介 · · · · · ·
To what extent do newly available case records bear out our conventional assumptions about the Qing legal system? Is it true, for example, that Qing courts rarely handled civil lawsuits—those concerned with disputes over land, debt, marriage, and inheritance—as official Qing representations led us to believe? Is it true that decent people did not use the courts? And is it true ...
To what extent do newly available case records bear out our conventional assumptions about the Qing legal system? Is it true, for example, that Qing courts rarely handled civil lawsuits—those concerned with disputes over land, debt, marriage, and inheritance—as official Qing representations led us to believe? Is it true that decent people did not use the courts? And is it true that magistrates generally relied more on moral predilections than on codified law in dealing with cases? Based in large part on records of 628 civil dispute cases from three counties from the 1760’s to the 1900’s, this book reexamines those widely accepted Qing representations in the light of actual practice.
The Qing state would have had us believe that civil disputes were so “minor” or “trivial” that they were left largely to local residents themselves to resolve. However, case records show that such disputes actually made up a major part of the caseloads of local courts. The Qing state held that lawsuits were the result of actions of immoral men, but ethnographic information and case records reveal that when community/kin mediation failed, many common peasants resorted to the courts to assert and protect their legitimate claims. The Qing state would have had us believe that local magistrates, when they did deal with civil disputes, did so as mediators rather than judges. Actual records reveal that magistrates almost never engaged in mediation but generally adjudicated according to stipulations in the Qing code.
Civil Justice in China的创作者
· · · · · ·
-
黄宗智 作者
作者简介 · · · · · ·
Philip C. C. Huang is Professor of History and Director of the Center for Chinese Studies at the University of California, Los Angeles.
目录 · · · · · ·
2. Defining categories: disputes and lawsuits in North China villages before the communist revolution
3. Informal justice: mediation in North China villages before the communist revolution
4. Formal justice: codified law and magisterial adjudication in the Qing
5. Between informal mediation and formal adjudication: the third realm of Qing justice
6. Two patterns in the Qing civil justice system
· · · · · · (更多)
2. Defining categories: disputes and lawsuits in North China villages before the communist revolution
3. Informal justice: mediation in North China villages before the communist revolution
4. Formal justice: codified law and magisterial adjudication in the Qing
5. Between informal mediation and formal adjudication: the third realm of Qing justice
6. Two patterns in the Qing civil justice system
7. Extent, cost and strategies of litigation
8. From the perspective of magistrate handbooks
9. Max Weber and the Qing legal and political system
Appendixes
References
Index
· · · · · · (收起)
喜欢读"Civil Justice in China"的人也喜欢 · · · · · ·
Civil Justice in China的书评 · · · · · · ( 全部 13 条 )

《清代的法律、社会与文化》
这篇书评可能有关键情节透露
《清代的法律、社会与文化》 黄宗智 著 广西师范大学出版社 黄宗智的《清代的法律、社会与文化》是一部极具深度的学术著作,深入探讨了清代中国的法律制度、社会结构与文化形态之间的复杂关系。 全书最为引人注目的是黄宗智对清代法律中 “官方表达”与“具体实践”之间表现出... (展开)
如何表達,誰的實踐?

法律的表达与实践的背离 ——兼评《清代法律、社会与文化》


硬核好书:清代的法律、社会与文化

清代法律的形成与嬗变

读黄宗智《清代的法律、社会与文化:民法的表达与实践》
这篇书评可能有关键情节透露
本书在上世纪末出版为英文版,1998年译为中文版,我读的是2014年中文版再版。本书基于清代法庭档案和民国时期的满铁调查,尝试分析清代民事纠纷的解决,揭示民间调解(亲邻)和官方判决(县令)的分野与互动。 读完此书,给我学理上的启发价值主要集中于两点。 1.清代的纠纷解... (展开)> 更多书评 13篇
论坛 · · · · · ·
在这本书的论坛里发言这本书的其他版本 · · · · · · ( 全部6 )
-
上海书店出版社 (2007)8.5分 305人读过
-
上海书店出版社 (2001)8.2分 164人读过
-
广西师范大学出版社 (2024)8.5分 55人读过
-
中国社会科学出版社 (1998年5月)暂无评分 11人读过
在哪儿借这本书 · · · · · ·
以下书单推荐 · · · · · · ( 全部 )
- Readings (王荣欣)
- China, Architecture (dionyshooooooo)
- 法律史与法律文化 (浮生若梦)
- 阿宗 (going my home)
- ❹·❷书单:让阅读成为习惯(英文原版) (无心恋战)
谁读这本书? · · · · · ·
二手市场
· · · · · ·
- 在豆瓣转让 有28人想读,手里有一本闲着?
订阅关于Civil Justice in China的评论:
feed: rss 2.0
0 有用 王荣欣 2012-01-12 14:04:20
一般。作者不懂法理学。
1 有用 王大福 2022-03-14 11:13:41
方法论太扎实了,通过研究巴县、宝坻、淡水的法律档案中表达与实践的分歧与韦伯substantive rationality(实体理性)对话,挑战了韦伯关于非理性-理性的二元论。作者将清代的法律条文表达和地方审案实践的不同归结于清代政治体系中世袭帝制与理性官僚制之间的张力。
0 有用 戚韶 2022-06-21 09:26:48
资格考重读法史(make 巴县 great again!