Hatred of Sex links Jacques Rancière’s political philosophy of the constitutive disorder of democracy with Jean Laplanche’s identification of a fundamental perturbation at the heart of human sexuality. Sex is hated as well as desired, Oliver Davis and Tim Dean contend, because sexual intensity impedes coherent selfhood and undermines identity, rendering us all a little more deplorable than we might wish. Davis and Dean explore the consequences of this conflicted dynamic across a range of fields and institutions, including queer studies, attachment theory, the #MeToo movement, and “traumatology,” demonstrating how hatred of sex has been optimized and exploited by neoliberalism.
Advancing strong claims about sex, pleasure, power, intersectionality, therapy, and governance, Davis and Dean shed new light on enduring questions of equality at a historical moment when democracy appears ever more precarious.
Review
“Fascinating, formidable, and timely, this volume probes unexpected links between democracy and sexuality. Hatred of Sex will undoubtedly disturb established ideas that are widely and at times too reflexively adopted in current academic conversations about sexuality. A manifesto grounded in careful scholarship, this book has the makings of a classic.”—Avgi Saketopoulou, faculty of the Postdoctoral Program in Psychotherapy and Psychoanalysis at New York University
“Hatred of Sex is a bold critical intervention in current discourses of violence, trauma, affect, attachment, and safety, propagated by queer studies, carceral feminism, the theory of intersectionality, and identity-driven politics. No other book has offered such an unapologetic and persuasive critique of the incursion of anti-democratic and sex-hating discourses in queer theory. Davis and Dean make arguments that few others would dare to wage, given how greatly they diverge from today’s prevailing sacred notions, political platitudes, and piously moralizing stances—found not on the political right but at the center of liberalism.”—John Paul Ricco, professor of comparative literature at the University of Toronto
3 有用 Cory 2023-01-02 02:45:35 上海
连接朗西埃的政治哲学与弗洛伊德的精神分析,指出新自由主义时代对(激进)民主与(“可鄙”的)性的憎恨,同样源自对“无序”的防御。对川普主义的分析超越了“白人怨恨”的常见归因,有不少启发。论及性对自我的破坏力(以及由此引发的性恐慌)并不新鲜,但总结得比Bersani、Edelman等人清晰许多。批判#MeToo的部分直接点出了激进左翼思想、精神分析派性别理论与liberal-carceral式女权主义... 连接朗西埃的政治哲学与弗洛伊德的精神分析,指出新自由主义时代对(激进)民主与(“可鄙”的)性的憎恨,同样源自对“无序”的防御。对川普主义的分析超越了“白人怨恨”的常见归因,有不少启发。论及性对自我的破坏力(以及由此引发的性恐慌)并不新鲜,但总结得比Bersani、Edelman等人清晰许多。批判#MeToo的部分直接点出了激进左翼思想、精神分析派性别理论与liberal-carceral式女权主义的张力,但没有回应非自由主义的女权论述对#MeToo的辩护,期待后续进一步展开。 (展开)