A general and systematic account of the role of knowledge in society aimed to stimulate both critical discussion and empirical investigations. This book is concerned with the sociology of 'everything that passes for knowledge in society'. It focuses particularly on that 'common-sense knowledge' which constitutes the reality of everyday life for the ordinary member of society. T...
A general and systematic account of the role of knowledge in society aimed to stimulate both critical discussion and empirical investigations. This book is concerned with the sociology of 'everything that passes for knowledge in society'. It focuses particularly on that 'common-sense knowledge' which constitutes the reality of everyday life for the ordinary member of society. The authors are concerned to present an analysis of knowledge in everyday life in the context of a theory of society as a dialectical process between objective and subjective reality. Their development of a theory of institutions, legitimations and socializations has implications beyond the discipline of sociology, and their 'humanistic' approach has considerable relevance for other social scientists, historians, philosophers and anthropologists.
The Social Construction of Reality的创作者
· · · · · ·
Peter Berger is Professor of Sociology and Theology at Boston University and is Director of the Institute on Culture, Religion, and World Affairs. Thomas Luckmann is Professor Emeritus of Sociology at the University of Constance, Germany.
![[美国] 彼得·伯格](https://img3.doubanio.com/img/author/medium/public/1516503245.09.jpg)
彼得·伯格 作者
0 有用 Whimsicat 2023-10-30 08:27:36 加拿大
核心问题是common sense如何支配日常生活——这本身来自对舒茨的一个误解：主体间性就是被共享了的知识；和哈贝马斯一样，正因为这一误解，米德对语言和互动的讨论才变得重要，但现象学洞见本身强调的却是差异性。也是因此，分析重心变成意义的外化（制度化、正当化）与内化（社会化），或者总的来说流动意义的客观化——只不过作者似乎无力区分objectivation和reification。社会学部分的讨论... 核心问题是common sense如何支配日常生活——这本身来自对舒茨的一个误解：主体间性就是被共享了的知识；和哈贝马斯一样，正因为这一误解，米德对语言和互动的讨论才变得重要，但现象学洞见本身强调的却是差异性。也是因此，分析重心变成意义的外化（制度化、正当化）与内化（社会化），或者总的来说流动意义的客观化——只不过作者似乎无力区分objectivation和reification。社会学部分的讨论颇有些结构功能主义色彩，尽管两位作者本身反对这一理论立场。外化部分隐约有涂尔干的二重性区分；全书大幅挪用了弗洛伊德的洞见——这本身是个重要启发：幻觉与能量，如何构成了对人的关键解释，以及社会心理学为什么对于人文社会科学是重要的。尾声部分，对社会学应当作为一门人文历史科学的振臂一呼，令人动容。 (展开)
0 有用 法妹儿 2017-09-21 23:16:59
以知识为主轴，分析如何外化与内化知识，将知识社会学溯源到马克思尼采与历史主义，试图融和W与D之间的隔断。客观化过程突出例行化常化与合法性，主观化过程突出社会化/内化过程。作为现象学根基的作品可以向上追溯黑格尔有关外化，胡塞尔对生活世界的被给予性以及伽达默尔突出生活世界建构性的分析
0 有用 钝刀龙戈 2018-12-10 18:25:58
知识社会学经典，影响深远，常读常新。写作风格值得借鉴。可见各个理论流派的影子：现象学社会学、符号互动论、新制度主义……消化了众理论硬核，然后用自己的话说出来自己想说的一套，偶尔还能举个例子深入浅出幽默一把，这才是理论的做法。
0 有用 飞哆 2019-07-26 11:19:02
艰涩。不太习惯那时候的写作风格。
0 有用 9 Crimes 2024-10-16 20:13:22 澳大利亚
企鹅一定要用这个XX的封面吗…绝了