作者:
Axel Honneth 出版社: The MIT Press 副标题: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts 译者:
Joel Anderson 出版年: 1996-10-11 页数: 240 定价: USD 29.00 装帧: Paperback ISBN: 9780262581479
In this pathbreaking study, Axel Honneth argues that "the struggle for recognition" is, and should be, at the center of social conflicts. Moving smoothly between moral philosophy and social theory, Honneth offers insights into such issues as the social forms of recognition and nonrecognition, the moral basis of interaction in human conflicts, the relation between the recognitio...
In this pathbreaking study, Axel Honneth argues that "the struggle for recognition" is, and should be, at the center of social conflicts. Moving smoothly between moral philosophy and social theory, Honneth offers insights into such issues as the social forms of recognition and nonrecognition, the moral basis of interaction in human conflicts, the relation between the recognition model and conceptions of modernity, the normative basis of social theory, and the possibility of mediating between Hegel and Kant.
Axel Honneth is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Konstanz.
原文摘录
· · · · · ·
Hegel thereby infuses the Aristotelian concept of an ethical form of life with a moral potential that no longer arises merely out of a particular kind of relationship between them. Thus, the coordinates of his political philosophy shift from a teleological concept of nature to a concept of the social, in which an internal tension is contained constitutively. (查看原文)
去年精读过两遍的书,今天回顾马尔库塞想起来标。我觉得从内容而不是顺序来说,可以分为三块儿,第一块是对黑格尔耶拿时期后的思想转折作为切入点,但印象里仅有一章,第二块是用Mead和Winnicott来引出他的三种recognitions:love, right and social esteem. 第三块就是继承法兰克福学派的衣钵,承前启后,承哈贝马斯的前,启normative critical th...去年精读过两遍的书,今天回顾马尔库塞想起来标。我觉得从内容而不是顺序来说,可以分为三块儿,第一块是对黑格尔耶拿时期后的思想转折作为切入点,但印象里仅有一章,第二块是用Mead和Winnicott来引出他的三种recognitions:love, right and social esteem. 第三块就是继承法兰克福学派的衣钵,承前启后,承哈贝马斯的前,启normative critical theory之挑战的后。江绪林老师非常看重这本书,具体的概括可以看他的书评,写得非常好。哎…(展开)
2 有用 绮绅 2019-02-28 12:12:05
去年精读过两遍的书,今天回顾马尔库塞想起来标。我觉得从内容而不是顺序来说,可以分为三块儿,第一块是对黑格尔耶拿时期后的思想转折作为切入点,但印象里仅有一章,第二块是用Mead和Winnicott来引出他的三种recognitions:love, right and social esteem. 第三块就是继承法兰克福学派的衣钵,承前启后,承哈贝马斯的前,启normative critical th... 去年精读过两遍的书,今天回顾马尔库塞想起来标。我觉得从内容而不是顺序来说,可以分为三块儿,第一块是对黑格尔耶拿时期后的思想转折作为切入点,但印象里仅有一章,第二块是用Mead和Winnicott来引出他的三种recognitions:love, right and social esteem. 第三块就是继承法兰克福学派的衣钵,承前启后,承哈贝马斯的前,启normative critical theory之挑战的后。江绪林老师非常看重这本书,具体的概括可以看他的书评,写得非常好。哎… (展开)
0 有用 浅中 2022-04-16 01:01:26
“Boldly may the son of God trust in the achievement of the struggle.”——G. W. F. Hegel
2 有用 一剑霜寒 2023-04-10 18:13:40 广西
作者想用承认理论来推进哈贝马斯基于普遍语用学的交往范式。问题意识一流。
0 有用 罗勒根 2022-04-22 05:19:29
#阅读小组#Book 2,第一部分是非常好的Lit Re。
0 有用 Joyceulysses 2017-11-11 05:38:15
一个非常具有启发性的对黑格尔社会哲学的exploitation,霍耐特老师真的厉害