出版社: Harvard University Press
副标题: 认真对待权利
出版年: 1978-11-1
页数: 392
定价: USD 32.50
装帧: Paperback
ISBN: 9780674867116
内容简介 · · · · · ·
What is law? What is it for? How should judges decide novel cases when the statutes and earlier decisions provide no clear answer? Do judges make up new law in such cases, or is there some higher law in which they discover the correct answer? Must everyone always obey the law? If not, when is a citizen morally free to disobey?
A renowned philosopher enters the debate surroundin...
What is law? What is it for? How should judges decide novel cases when the statutes and earlier decisions provide no clear answer? Do judges make up new law in such cases, or is there some higher law in which they discover the correct answer? Must everyone always obey the law? If not, when is a citizen morally free to disobey?
A renowned philosopher enters the debate surrounding these questions. Clearly and forcefully, Ronald Dworkin argues against the “ruling” theory in Anglo-American law—legal positivism and economic utilitarianism—and asserts that individuals have legal rights beyond those explicitly laid down and that they have political and moral rights against the state that are prior to the welfare of the majority.
Mr. Dworkin criticizes in detail the legal positivists’ theory of legal rights, particularly H. L. A. Hart’s well-known version of it. He then develops a new theory of adjudication, and applies it to the central and politically important issue of cases in which the Supreme Court interprets and applies the Constitution. Through an analysis of John Rawls’s theory of justice, he argues that fundamental among political rights is the right of each individual to the equal respect and concern of those who govern him. He offers a theory of compliance with the law designed not simply to answer theoretical questions about civil disobedience, but to function as a guide for citizens and officials. Finally, Professor Dworkin considers the right to liberty, often thought to rival and even preempt the fundamental right to equality. He argues that distinct individual liberties do exist, but that they derive, not from some abstract right to liberty as such, but from the right to equal concern and respect itself. He thus denies that liberty and equality are conflicting ideals.
Ronald Dworkin’s theory of law and the moral conception of individual rights that underlies it have already made him one of the most influential philosophers working in this area. This is the first publication of these ideas in book form.
Taking Rights Seriously的创作者
· · · · · ·
-
罗纳德·德沃金 作者
作者简介 · · · · · ·
Ronald Dworkin was Frank Henry Sommer Professor of Law and Philosophy at New York University. He was the 2007 winner of the Ludvig Holberg International Memorial Prize for his “pioneering scholarly work” of “worldwide impact.”
目录 · · · · · ·
1. Jurisprudence
2. The Model of Rules I
3. The Model of Rules II
4. Hard Cases
5. Constitutional Cases
· · · · · · (更多)
1. Jurisprudence
2. The Model of Rules I
3. The Model of Rules II
4. Hard Cases
5. Constitutional Cases
6. Justice and Rights
7. Taking Rights Seriously
8. Civil Disobedience
9. Reverse Discrimination
10. Liberty and Moralism
11. Liberty and Liberalism
12. What Rights Do We Have?
13. Can Rights Be Controversial?
Appendix: A Reply to Critics
Index
· · · · · · (收起)
喜欢读"Taking Rights Seriously"的人也喜欢 · · · · · ·
Taking Rights Seriously的书评 · · · · · · ( 全部 13 条 )
Ronald Dworkin 《认真看待权利(Take rights seriously,1977)》小摘
读书笔记——规则模式一二
这篇书评可能有关键情节透露
收录自Ronald Dworkin,Taking Rights Seriously The Model of Rules I (pp.14-45); The Models of Rules II(pp.46-80) 本读书笔记由两部分组成。第一部分是概述,旨在整体把握文本;第二部分是详述,是基于文本论证顺序而对整体论证的梳理总结,以便日后能够快速定位回到文本... (展开)【笔记】我们遵守法律,是因为我们感到遵守法律是正确的
【转】罗纳德·德沃金:对批评的一个回应——《认真对待权利》附录(上)
> 更多书评 13篇
论坛 · · · · · ·
在这本书的论坛里发言这本书的其他版本 · · · · · · ( 全部8 )
-
上海三联书店 (2008)8.5分 237人读过
-
中国大百科全书出版社 (2002)8.4分 252人读过
-
五南 (2013)暂无评分 12人读过
-
Gerald Duckworth & Co Ltd (1978)暂无评分 10人读过
以下书单推荐 · · · · · · ( 全部 )
- 10年前北大的“当代西方社会科学推荐书目” (salva)
- 我的原版书 (新月)
- Ronald Dworkin (默识)
- 德沃金及其批评者 (默识)
- ◆岊湬的书柜(28) (岊湬)
谁读这本书? · · · · · ·
二手市场
· · · · · ·
订阅关于Taking Rights Seriously的评论:
feed: rss 2.0
0 有用 小韩de天空 2024-02-12 17:27:47 安徽
为写论文读了“公民不服从”和“反思平衡”相关的。对反思平衡的解读非常精彩。
1 有用 文盲殿大学士 2016-05-30 22:41:21
阎王爷的告示——鬼话连篇。
0 有用 法妹儿 2017-04-20 00:27:19
地上花儿为谁开,水中鸳鸯为谁成双?丢块儿手绢在风中,风吹到哥哥身旁~ 心上妹妹猜不透,哥哥睡不香。
0 有用 正在写论文✍🏻 2020-03-30 11:38:42
读的时候深感自己思维容量之小,书很好,是我读不懂罢了💔法理学的大佬们或许可以试着写的人话一点吗💔
0 有用 学渣 2020-02-26 11:45:10
该书难以理解的原因主要在于,Ronald Dworkin就像思想家中的高斯,经常巧妙地隐去通过牖中窥日的法理学知识实现的、虽然往往完全合理但却属非常规理解方法的痕迹,之所以喋喋不休地阐述某些细节很可能也是因为作者要试图以他的方式确保其著作的严谨性。
0 有用 小韩de天空 2024-02-12 17:27:47 安徽
为写论文读了“公民不服从”和“反思平衡”相关的。对反思平衡的解读非常精彩。
0 有用 最后一代 2023-05-31 12:52:52 广东
人文學科屆的「阿甘正傳」
0 有用 竹樵 2022-08-08 16:44:19
就是说,很多人从这书中能够抽出一个德沃金的裁判理论,就是权利——社会共同政治道德信念——建构性解释——与法律体系相融贯啥的,但是隐约感觉很危险。如果说权利命题是针对自由裁量的,那还好,如果说是解释融贯性的,那么从里面找裁判方法论可就是有寻章摘句捕风捉影的嫌疑了啊。。
0 有用 团结团结团结! 2021-09-27 18:35:43
属实喜欢不起来。
0 有用 正在写论文✍🏻 2020-03-30 11:38:42
读的时候深感自己思维容量之小,书很好,是我读不懂罢了💔法理学的大佬们或许可以试着写的人话一点吗💔