作者:
James Clifford (ed.)
/
George Marcus (ed.) 出版社: University of California Press 副标题: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography 出版年: 1986-4-11 页数: 345 定价: USD 27.95 装帧: Paperback ISBN: 9780520057296
In these new essays, a group of experienced ethnographers, a literary critic, and a historian of anthropology, all known for advanced analytic work on ethnographic writing, place ethnography at the center of a new intersection of social history, interpretive anthropology, travel writing, discourse theory, and textual criticism. The authors analyze classic examples of cultural d...
In these new essays, a group of experienced ethnographers, a literary critic, and a historian of anthropology, all known for advanced analytic work on ethnographic writing, place ethnography at the center of a new intersection of social history, interpretive anthropology, travel writing, discourse theory, and textual criticism. The authors analyze classic examples of cultural description, from Goethe and Catlin to Malinowski, Evans-Pritchard, and Le Roy Ladurie, showing the persistence of allegorial patterns and rhetorical tropes. They assess recent experimental trends and explore the functions of orality, ethnicity, and power in ethnographic composition."Writing Culture" argues that ethnography is in the midst of a political and epistemological crisis: Western writers no longer portray non-Western peoples with unchallenged authority; the process of cultural representation is now inescapably contingent, historical, and contestable. The essays in this volume help us imagine a fully dialectical ethnography acting powerfully in the postmodern world system. They challenge all writers in the humanities and social sciences to rethink the poetics and politics of cultural invention.
目录
· · · · · ·
Preface
1. Partial Truths, by James Clifford
2. Fieldwork in Common Places, by Mary Louise Pratt
3. Hermes' Dilemma: The Masking of Subversion in Ethnographic Description, by Vincent Crapanzano
4. From the Door of His Tent: The Fieldworker and the Inquisitor, by Renato Rosaldo
5. On Ethnographic Allegory, by James Clifford
· · · · · ·
(更多)
Preface
1. Partial Truths, by James Clifford
2. Fieldwork in Common Places, by Mary Louise Pratt
3. Hermes' Dilemma: The Masking of Subversion in Ethnographic Description, by Vincent Crapanzano
4. From the Door of His Tent: The Fieldworker and the Inquisitor, by Renato Rosaldo
5. On Ethnographic Allegory, by James Clifford
6. Post-Modern Ethnography: From Document of the Occult to Occult Document, by Stephen A. Tyler
7. The Concept of Cultural Translation in British Social Anthropology, by Talal Asad
8. Contemporary Problems of Ethnography in the Modern World System, by George E. Marcus
9. Ethnicity and the Post-Modern Arts of Memory, by Michael M. J. Fischer
10. Representations Are Social Facts: Modernity and Post-Modernity in Anthropology, by Paul Rabinow
Afterword: Ethnographic Writing and Anthropological Careers, by George E. Marcus
Bibliography
Notes on Contributors
Index
· · · · · · (收起)
It’s a bit funny how things are. After more than thirty years when the book was published, I still found some pieces very relevant and eloquent and more inspiring than a whole lot of recently publishe...It’s a bit funny how things are. After more than thirty years when the book was published, I still found some pieces very relevant and eloquent and more inspiring than a whole lot of recently published articles or books - I quote Clifford, “Every focus excludes. There is no politically innocent methodology for intellectual interpretation.” (展开)
wema
商务印书馆2006版
木马黄的公共图书馆
商务印书馆2006版
胖虫
商务印书馆2006版
兔儿奶：脑震荡严重ing
商务印书馆2006版
塗尔干
0 有用 迷宫的谜人 2011-10-24 11:28:12
艰难地读过一章‘Representations are social facts: modernity and post-modernity in Anthropology’。凤凰姐的教材。请三思而后读。
0 有用 亘佑 2024-01-18 20:06:24 日本
民族志是经过书写者有意识的取舍的，受修辞学制约的，蕴含了调查者和被调查者的不平衡权力关系的，立足于“西洋”权威的“有限的事实”。
0 有用 Sea son 2019-04-23 13:55:52
How about the other of “the other”?? the difference of “the difference”??
0 有用 焉能淩风飞 2017-11-02 13:22:15
feminism is a perspective, not a theory.
0 有用 Artemis 2024-02-04 00:32:06 英国
人类学的后现代序章，开始真正系统地反思尤其是民族志书写中对异文化表征的权利不平等问题——人类学家如何将自己的主观感受论述为权威，异文化又是如何在西方中心的话语以及主观假设以及想象下被呈现的。历史，文化，权力之间的交织尽数在民族志中体现了，民族志绝非叙述客观事实。
0 有用 哆啦美 2024-02-07 09:46:57 美国
It’s a bit funny how things are. After more than thirty years when the book was published, I still found some pieces very relevant and eloquent and more inspiring than a whole lot of recently publishe... It’s a bit funny how things are. After more than thirty years when the book was published, I still found some pieces very relevant and eloquent and more inspiring than a whole lot of recently published articles or books - I quote Clifford, “Every focus excludes. There is no politically innocent methodology for intellectual interpretation.” (展开)
0 有用 Artemis 2024-02-04 00:32:06 英国
人类学的后现代序章，开始真正系统地反思尤其是民族志书写中对异文化表征的权利不平等问题——人类学家如何将自己的主观感受论述为权威，异文化又是如何在西方中心的话语以及主观假设以及想象下被呈现的。历史，文化，权力之间的交织尽数在民族志中体现了，民族志绝非叙述客观事实。
0 有用 亘佑 2024-01-18 20:06:24 日本
民族志是经过书写者有意识的取舍的，受修辞学制约的，蕴含了调查者和被调查者的不平衡权力关系的，立足于“西洋”权威的“有限的事实”。
0 有用 越洋鲫鱼 2022-10-21 07:57:41 美国
之前读的时候没有意识到，写文化其实包含了两个转向，一个是从对他者的表征向meta representation的转向，还有一个是Wolf和世界体系理论的那个问题意识，只不过是用《学做工》这种文本讲的之前就没太注意。这两个转向是共同被agency一股脑解决的
0 有用 袜袜 2022-07-31 04:14:14
没读完