作者:
Tony Judt 出版社: University of California Press 副标题: French Intellectuals, 1944-1956 出版年: 1994-2-10 页数: 348 定价: USD 24.95 装帧: Paperback ISBN: 9780520086500
The uniquely prominent role of French intellectuals in European cultural and political life following World War II is the focus of Tony Judt's newest book. He analyzes this intellectual community's most divisive conflicts: how to respond to the promise and the betrayal of Communism and how to sustain a commitment to radical ideals when confronting the hypocrisy in Stali...
The uniquely prominent role of French intellectuals in European cultural and political life following World War II is the focus of Tony Judt's newest book. He analyzes this intellectual community's most divisive conflicts: how to respond to the promise and the betrayal of Communism and how to sustain a commitment to radical ideals when confronting the hypocrisy in Stalin's Soviet Union, in the new Eastern European Communist states, and in France itself. Judt shows why this was an all-consuming moral dilemma to a generation of French men and women, how their responses were conditioned by war and occupation, and how post-war political choices have come to sit uneasily on the conscience of later generations of French intellectuals. Judt's analysis extends beyond the writings of fashionable "Existentialist" personalities such as Jean-Paul Sartre, Albert Camus, and Simone de Beauvoir to include a wide intellectual community of Catholic philosophers, non- aligned journalists, literary critics and poets, Communist and non-Communist alike. Judt treats the intellectual dilemmas of the postwar years as an unfinished history. French intellectuals have not fully come to terms with the gnawing sense of what Judt calls the "moral irresponsibility" of those years. The result, he suggests, is a legacy of bad faith and confusion that has damaged France's cultural standing, notably in newly liberated Eastern Europe, and which reflects the nation's larger difficulty in confronting its own ambivalent past.
t.judt painted himself a grim picture of his own intellectually evolved history thru this analogy of a group of radical idealists, he didnt set an explicit moral high ground to dissect those ideologic...t.judt painted himself a grim picture of his own intellectually evolved history thru this analogy of a group of radical idealists, he didnt set an explicit moral high ground to dissect those ideological "losers" and had avoided himself being a moral complicity, an imperfect past is a lesson learned but not necessarily leads to intellectual immunity(展开)
t.judt painted himself a grim picture of his own intellectually evolved history thru this analogy of a group of radical idealists, he didnt set an explicit moral high ground to dissect those ideologic...t.judt painted himself a grim picture of his own intellectually evolved history thru this analogy of a group of radical idealists, he didnt set an explicit moral high ground to dissect those ideological "losers" and had avoided himself being a moral complicity, an imperfect past is a lesson learned but not necessarily leads to intellectual immunity(展开)
timeregister
中信出版社2016版
江海一蓑翁
中信出版社2016版
吴情
中信出版社2016版
Vinland
中信出版社2016版
bangma
中信出版社2016版
Soundofwood
中信出版社2016版
0 有用 嘘八百の徒然 2018-06-20 11:38:48
虽然我觉得有的观点完全是站在后来者的立场说风凉话，但是不得不承认，这本书无论怎么看都很牛逼！读完了对法国知识界和对马克思主义都有新的认识。当然读起来还是挺难的，作者的语言挺绕的，而且你得对法国史和知识分子那点儿掌故稍微知道点儿。
1 有用 Absurdfool 2018-01-18 15:03:26
t.judt painted himself a grim picture of his own intellectually evolved history thru this analogy of a group of radical idealists, he didnt set an explicit moral high ground to dissect those ideologic... t.judt painted himself a grim picture of his own intellectually evolved history thru this analogy of a group of radical idealists, he didnt set an explicit moral high ground to dissect those ideological "losers" and had avoided himself being a moral complicity, an imperfect past is a lesson learned but not necessarily leads to intellectual immunity (展开)
0 有用 Porc au Prince 2018-04-13 04:50:45
终于读完了......
2 有用 Bousphoros 2017-01-12 08:29:22
非常有趣～ 揭露了法国左翼知识分子的各种吃相难看。其中最好看的一章是写法国知识分子的反美情绪的。我一直有个印象，法国人对美国人总有一种特别的敌意，以至于我在北京都很少跟法国人聊这个话题（去年跟一个帅帅的法国来的交换生小哥还专门聊过这个问题，他是少有的批评法国教育制度而赞美美国的）。这本书的这个章节梳理了法国文人憎恶美国的思想史。以这个背景为参照，托克维尔能对美国进行如此深入的观察，并对美国提出批评... 非常有趣～ 揭露了法国左翼知识分子的各种吃相难看。其中最好看的一章是写法国知识分子的反美情绪的。我一直有个印象，法国人对美国人总有一种特别的敌意，以至于我在北京都很少跟法国人聊这个话题（去年跟一个帅帅的法国来的交换生小哥还专门聊过这个问题，他是少有的批评法国教育制度而赞美美国的）。这本书的这个章节梳理了法国文人憎恶美国的思想史。以这个背景为参照，托克维尔能对美国进行如此深入的观察，并对美国提出批评性的赞扬，实在是法国文化史上的一个特殊现象了。 (展开)
0 有用 嘘八百の徒然 2018-06-20 11:38:48
虽然我觉得有的观点完全是站在后来者的立场说风凉话，但是不得不承认，这本书无论怎么看都很牛逼！读完了对法国知识界和对马克思主义都有新的认识。当然读起来还是挺难的，作者的语言挺绕的，而且你得对法国史和知识分子那点儿掌故稍微知道点儿。
0 有用 Porc au Prince 2018-04-13 04:50:45
终于读完了......
1 有用 Absurdfool 2018-01-18 15:03:26
t.judt painted himself a grim picture of his own intellectually evolved history thru this analogy of a group of radical idealists, he didnt set an explicit moral high ground to dissect those ideologic... t.judt painted himself a grim picture of his own intellectually evolved history thru this analogy of a group of radical idealists, he didnt set an explicit moral high ground to dissect those ideological "losers" and had avoided himself being a moral complicity, an imperfect past is a lesson learned but not necessarily leads to intellectual immunity (展开)
2 有用 Bousphoros 2017-01-12 08:29:22
非常有趣～ 揭露了法国左翼知识分子的各种吃相难看。其中最好看的一章是写法国知识分子的反美情绪的。我一直有个印象，法国人对美国人总有一种特别的敌意，以至于我在北京都很少跟法国人聊这个话题（去年跟一个帅帅的法国来的交换生小哥还专门聊过这个问题，他是少有的批评法国教育制度而赞美美国的）。这本书的这个章节梳理了法国文人憎恶美国的思想史。以这个背景为参照，托克维尔能对美国进行如此深入的观察，并对美国提出批评... 非常有趣～ 揭露了法国左翼知识分子的各种吃相难看。其中最好看的一章是写法国知识分子的反美情绪的。我一直有个印象，法国人对美国人总有一种特别的敌意，以至于我在北京都很少跟法国人聊这个话题（去年跟一个帅帅的法国来的交换生小哥还专门聊过这个问题，他是少有的批评法国教育制度而赞美美国的）。这本书的这个章节梳理了法国文人憎恶美国的思想史。以这个背景为参照，托克维尔能对美国进行如此深入的观察，并对美国提出批评性的赞扬，实在是法国文化史上的一个特殊现象了。 (展开)