Scholars have generally assumed that authoritarianism and rule of law are mutually incompatible. Convinced that free markets and rule of law must tip authoritarian societies in a liberal direction, nearly all studies of law and contemporary politics have neglected that improbable coupling: authoritarian rule of law. Through a focus on Singapore, this book presents an analysis o...
Scholars have generally assumed that authoritarianism and rule of law are mutually incompatible. Convinced that free markets and rule of law must tip authoritarian societies in a liberal direction, nearly all studies of law and contemporary politics have neglected that improbable coupling: authoritarian rule of law. Through a focus on Singapore, this book presents an analysis of authoritarian legalism. It shows how prosperity, public discourse, and a rigorous observance of legal procedure have enabled a reconfigured rule of law such that liberal form encases illiberal content. Institutions and process at the bedrock of rule of law and liberal democracy become tools to constrain dissent while augmenting discretionary political power - even as the national and international legitimacy of the state is secured. This book offers a valuable and original contribution to understanding the complexities of law, language and legitimacy in our time.
作者简介
· · · · · ·
Jothie Rajah, American Bar Foundation
Jothie Rajah is Research Professor at the American Bar Foundation, Chicago. She obtained her Ph.D. at the Melbourne Law School, Australia, where she was awarded the 2010 Harold Luntz Graduate Research Thesis Prize for achieving an overall level of excellence. She is the author of a number of articles on state management of ideological conte...
Jothie Rajah is Research Professor at the American Bar Foundation, Chicago. She obtained her Ph.D. at the Melbourne Law School, Australia, where she was awarded the 2010 Harold Luntz Graduate Research Thesis Prize for achieving an overall level of excellence. She is the author of a number of articles on state management of ideological contestation through law. She has taught at the Melbourne Law School, the National University of Singapore and the Institute of Education, Singapore. Her current research focuses on global discourses on the rule of law and colonial constructions of Hindu law in the Straits Settlements.
目录
· · · · · ·
1. Law, illiberalism, and the Singapore case
2. Law as discourse: theoretical and definitional parameters
3. Punishing bodies, securing the nation:
1966 Vandalism Act
4. Policing the press: the Newspaper and Printing Presses Act
5. Policing lawyers and constraining citizenship: Legal Profession (Am't) Act 1986
· · · · · ·
(更多)
1. Law, illiberalism, and the Singapore case
2. Law as discourse: theoretical and definitional parameters
3. Punishing bodies, securing the nation:
1966 Vandalism Act
4. Policing the press: the Newspaper and Printing Presses Act
5. Policing lawyers and constraining citizenship: Legal Profession (Am't) Act 1986
6. Policing religion: Maintenance of Religious Harmony Act
7. Entrenching illiberalism: the 2009 Public Order Act
8. Legislation, illiberalism and legitimacy.
· · · · · · (收起)
Through 5 case studies, which also the main body of the book, the author illustrates how Singapore maintains its legitimacy as a rule-of-law polity despite its rule-by-law practices.
🌇
浙江大学出版社2019版
舞池里的塔西佗
浙江大学出版社2019版
理一分殊
我想讲故事
浙江大学出版社2019版
老毛豆
浙江大学出版社2019版
猜想君
浙江大学出版社2019版
没有烦恼的少女
浙江大学出版社2019版
support
浙江大学出版社2019版
0 有用 风之子 2022-11-27 13:38:35 中国香港
電子書
0 有用 Wang Weichen 2023-05-09 01:37:05 北京
Through 5 case studies, which also the main body of the book, the author illustrates how Singapore maintains its legitimacy as a rule-of-law polity despite its rule-by-law practices.