Few discussions in modern social science have occupied as much attention as the changing nature of welfare states in Western societies. Gosta Esping-Andersen, one of the foremost contributors to current debates on this issue, here provides a new analysis of the character and role of welfare states in the functioning of contemporary advanced Western societies. Esping-Andersen di...
Few discussions in modern social science have occupied as much attention as the changing nature of welfare states in Western societies. Gosta Esping-Andersen, one of the foremost contributors to current debates on this issue, here provides a new analysis of the character and role of welfare states in the functioning of contemporary advanced Western societies. Esping-Andersen distinguishes three major types of welfare state, connecting these with variations in the historical development of different Western countries. He argues that current economic processes, such as those moving toward a postindustrial order, are shaped not by autonomous market forces but by the nature of states and state differences. Fully informed by comparative materials, this book will have great appeal to all those working on issues of economic development and postindustrialism. Its audience will include students of sociology, economics, and politics.
作者简介
· · · · · ·
Gøsta Esping-Andersen (born 24 November 1947, Næstved, Denmark) is a Danish sociologist whose primary focus is on the welfare state and its place in capitalist economies. Esping-Andersen is a professor at Pompeu Fabra University in Barcelona (Spain), and member of the Scientific Committee of the Juan March Institute and of the Board of Trustees and the Scientific Council at the...
Gøsta Esping-Andersen (born 24 November 1947, Næstved, Denmark) is a Danish sociologist whose primary focus is on the welfare state and its place in capitalist economies. Esping-Andersen is a professor at Pompeu Fabra University in Barcelona (Spain), and member of the Scientific Committee of the Juan March Institute and of the Board of Trustees and the Scientific Council at the IMDEA Social Sciences Institute, both in Madrid (Spain).
There are three major causes of welfare-state regimes: (1) the nature of class mobilization, especially of the working class; (2) the class-political coalition structures; and (3) the historical legac...There are three major causes of welfare-state regimes: (1) the nature of class mobilization, especially of the working class; (2) the class-political coalition structures; and (3) the historical legacy of regime institutionalization.(展开)
The social democratic model is father to one of the leading hypothese of contemporary welfare state debate-----parliamentary class-mobilization is a means for the realization of the socialist ideals of equality, justice, freedom, and solidarity.
(展开)
我的豆瓣账号
法律出版社2003版
妖六三
法律出版社2003版
胡不归
法律出版社2003版
愛心菠蘿
炼狱茨木童子
法律出版社2003版
3 有用 愛心菠蘿 2014-01-06 15:36:23
正如作者所说，这本书的目的并不是预测福利国家的未来，而是通过对三种不同的福利国家类型的分析，来帮助大家理解当今（80年代-90年代）福利国家的不同的发展轨迹。作者通过“非商品化”“社会阶层”“养老金体制”“权力结构”等等多个方面，很清晰地为我们划分出了三个截然不同，而又相互影响的福利国家类型。英文原版书专业词汇太多，对于我这个英语不好的人来说，看它确实要下很大的功夫，但却获益颇多。这本书应该主要面... 正如作者所说，这本书的目的并不是预测福利国家的未来，而是通过对三种不同的福利国家类型的分析，来帮助大家理解当今（80年代-90年代）福利国家的不同的发展轨迹。作者通过“非商品化”“社会阶层”“养老金体制”“权力结构”等等多个方面，很清晰地为我们划分出了三个截然不同，而又相互影响的福利国家类型。英文原版书专业词汇太多，对于我这个英语不好的人来说，看它确实要下很大的功夫，但却获益颇多。这本书应该主要面向经济学专业的人，政治学专业的人看这本书，很多经济学的公式和算法比较复杂，比如说我，看数字就头疼，也就更加坚定了我放弃本科的经济学，转身政治学的信念了。。。 (展开)
0 有用 Östrom 2019-04-07 23:27:41
算是研究福利国家制度的经典必读了吧，kind of wordy，但是分类真的很经典，以及这个宏观研究方法，真的服
0 有用 不要吃太多西瓜 2017-03-04 06:20:58
宏观分析做到这样太厉害 Intro简直典范
0 有用 耳虫 2019-11-26 17:10:23
1. 回应商品化（政治经济学的视角），把福利国家分成三类liberal（政府与市场，走向dualism）conservative corporatist（强调家庭和教会的支持，并不排斥市场）, social democratic（universalism，排斥市场）ws regime。2. 在1的基础上，解释影响福利国家形成的因素：阶级动员的性质（esp工人阶级，分析SDM），阶级-政治联盟的结构... 1. 回应商品化（政治经济学的视角），把福利国家分成三类liberal（政府与市场，走向dualism）conservative corporatist（强调家庭和教会的支持，并不排斥市场）, social democratic（universalism，排斥市场）ws regime。2. 在1的基础上，解释影响福利国家形成的因素：阶级动员的性质（esp工人阶级，分析SDM），阶级-政治联盟的结构和制度化的历史遗产。3. backlash的原因：不在于spending的数量而在于阶级特征，middle class loyality。联系再分配悖论（korpi &palme） (展开)
0 有用 MMOO 2020-06-26 15:10:32
一个月前心浮气躁读了三个小时完全不知所云，一个月后独自坐在图书馆，不断查概念查学者，对其深邃而严谨的思考肃然起敬。
0 有用 酷酷功仔 2024-05-23 10:20:11 上海
There are three major causes of welfare-state regimes: (1) the nature of class mobilization, especially of the working class; (2) the class-political coalition structures; and (3) the historical legac... There are three major causes of welfare-state regimes: (1) the nature of class mobilization, especially of the working class; (2) the class-political coalition structures; and (3) the historical legacy of regime institutionalization. (展开)
0 有用 张大猫 2023-10-02 01:15:10 美国
比起对于社会福利本身的讨论，对于三种类型的历史起源的分析和对Polanyi的隐含回应应该算是更有趣（也更重要）的地方
0 有用 铁柱丽叶 2023-02-10 22:32:52 奥地利
窝巢 所有研究welfare state的人都在引用他 大牛大牛
0 有用 小猎户星 2021-09-01 06:52:07
LSE暑校之书，打破次元壁的神奇存在。再不标暑假就过去了。
0 有用 Parker Li 2021-02-23 01:29:03
【COMP】PoliEcon 精彩，虽然按照income来划分过于“粗暴”，但其深层逻辑和角度夯实有效。几年后的social foundations of postindustrial economies 一定程度上回应了对本书的质疑。话虽如此，本书还是明确的欧洲视角，生搬硬套本书去解释日本，台湾，韩国，新加坡等等是行不通的。就像所说，historical path dependency，开头的历... 【COMP】PoliEcon 精彩，虽然按照income来划分过于“粗暴”，但其深层逻辑和角度夯实有效。几年后的social foundations of postindustrial economies 一定程度上回应了对本书的质疑。话虽如此，本书还是明确的欧洲视角，生搬硬套本书去解释日本，台湾，韩国，新加坡等等是行不通的。就像所说，historical path dependency，开头的历史不一样，那就真的相互越来越远了。 (展开)