作者:
Peter Lorge 出版社: Cambridge University Press 副标题: Peace through War under the Song Dynasty 出版年: 2015-11-26 页数: 307 定价: USD 99.99 装帧: Hardcover ISBN: 9781107084759
The Song dynasty (960–1279) has been characterized by its pre-eminent civil culture and military weakness. This groundbreaking work dem onstrates that the civil dominance of the eleventh century was the product of a half-century of continuous warfare...
The Song dynasty (960–1279) has been characterized by its pre-eminent civil culture and military weakness. This groundbreaking work dem onstrates that the civil dominance of the eleventh century was the product of a half-century of continuous warfare and ruthless political infighting. The spectacular culture of the eleventh century, one of the high points in Chinese history, was built on the bloody foundation of the conquests of the tenth century. Peter Lorge examines how, rather than a planned and inevitable reunification of the Chinese empire, the foundation of the Song was an uncertain undertaking, dependent upon highly contingent battles, both military and political, whose outcome was always in doubt. Song civil culture grew out of the successful military campaigns that created the dynasty and, as the need for war and armies diminished, the need for civil officials grew. The Song dynasty's successful waging of war led ultimately to peace.
Proposes a new view of the Song dynasty's foundation, demonstrating the importance of war and politics in imperial China
Illustrates the importance of war in Chinese history, providing a real and understandable account of how war created a major dynasty
Examines how political and military power interacted in the creation of an imperial government and how statesmen used these tools to advance themselves
作者简介
· · · · · ·
Peter Lorge, Vanderbilt University, Tennessee
Peter Lorge specializes in tenth- and eleventh-century Chinese military history and thought, and is the author, most recently, of Chinese Martial Arts: From Antiquity to the Twenty-First Century (Cambridge, 2012), and editor of The Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms, and Debating War in Chinese History. He has a forthcoming edited volu...
Peter Lorge specializes in tenth- and eleventh-century Chinese military history and thought, and is the author, most recently, of Chinese Martial Arts: From Antiquity to the Twenty-First Century (Cambridge, 2012), and editor of The Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms, and Debating War in Chinese History. He has a forthcoming edited volume with Kaushik Roy, Chinese and Indian Warfare: From Classical Times Until 1870. His earlier books include War, Politics and Society in Early Modern China, 900–1795 (2005) and The Asian Military Revolution: From Gunpowder to the Bomb (Cambridge, 2008). He is also the editor of a book series with Routledge, Asian States and Empires. He is currently working on a history of Chinese military thought from the third to the thirteenth centuries.
目录
· · · · · ·
1. Introduction
2. Historiography, methodology, and Song military and political history
3. The pivot of the tenth century
4. Rebuilding the empire
5. The army and the creation of the Song dynasty
6. Personal politics and the campaigns of conquest
· · · · · ·
(更多)
1. Introduction
2. Historiography, methodology, and Song military and political history
3. The pivot of the tenth century
4. Rebuilding the empire
5. The army and the creation of the Song dynasty
6. Personal politics and the campaigns of conquest
7. Separating war and politics
8. Fighting to become emperor
9. Failure and rebellion
10. The end of the beginning
11. Conclusion
Bibliography
Index.
· · · · · · (收起)
理一分殊
九州出版社2021版
7 有用 功夫熊猫小碗熊 2016-10-26 13:10:09
博论蛰伏二十年出书果然不同凡响。颇有过多借引西论和过度阐释弊端，但点出战争与军事—政治考虑在宋朝开国中重要意义，结合以往作品开辟一种以战争（有组织暴力）和政治合法性（文武关系、武风逐渐减退、开国君主如何保证有系统地将军队和将领脱嵌于个人权威而置于帝国制度管治下）观察中国王朝建立和崩坏循环的路径。对辽的重视也为宋朝政治军事研究所罕见，似乎一直强调辽朝存在对宋朝作为天命所归占据中原虽然构成实体和言说上... 博论蛰伏二十年出书果然不同凡响。颇有过多借引西论和过度阐释弊端，但点出战争与军事—政治考虑在宋朝开国中重要意义，结合以往作品开辟一种以战争（有组织暴力）和政治合法性（文武关系、武风逐渐减退、开国君主如何保证有系统地将军队和将领脱嵌于个人权威而置于帝国制度管治下）观察中国王朝建立和崩坏循环的路径。对辽的重视也为宋朝政治军事研究所罕见，似乎一直强调辽朝存在对宋朝作为天命所归占据中原虽然构成实体和言说上的威胁（南朝vs北朝），但辽国对中原野心并不大，边疆也早已形成相对稳定交流和对峙状态，相反宋太祖太宗在扫清南方后多次攻击北汉、侵入辽地、军队持续保持攻击态势，才迫使辽国萧太后作出主动攻击姿态，澶渊之盟既是宋代扩张结束也标志着宋代天命缺失（无法收复幽云十六州）将持续困扰宋朝大战略。 (展开)
1 有用 侯粉 2020-05-09 05:01:37
3星半作品，打3星是因为作者语法错误太多，而且句式选择太差。最大价值是简明扼要地梳理了从周世宗到宋真宗的战役。核心论点：宋朝是武力开国的政权，澶渊之盟之前，军事是宋朝的主体性格，而非11世纪后文人（如范祖禹）建构的那个自太祖登基起便以文治为主的朝代；对于世宗、太祖、太宗而言，皇帝的政治权力有赖于军事成功，而政治权力也会影响军事实力。对于宋太祖，政治和军事无法分开，他的政治成功来自于军事成功。太宗在... 3星半作品，打3星是因为作者语法错误太多，而且句式选择太差。最大价值是简明扼要地梳理了从周世宗到宋真宗的战役。核心论点：宋朝是武力开国的政权，澶渊之盟之前，军事是宋朝的主体性格，而非11世纪后文人（如范祖禹）建构的那个自太祖登基起便以文治为主的朝代；对于世宗、太祖、太宗而言，皇帝的政治权力有赖于军事成功，而政治权力也会影响军事实力。对于宋太祖，政治和军事无法分开，他的政治成功来自于军事成功。太宗在亲征灭汉后选择直接伐辽，是因为得国不正的他更需要通过胜利证明自己。其在军事上的失败导致政治危机，进而不得不采取文治，把军事与政治区分开。真宗即位后皇权稳固，才使得他有可能接受澶渊之盟（太宗是不可能搞盟约的，因为内部政治不允许）。这书最大的缺点是关键概念缺乏定义，且政治动机分析很难找到直接史料支持。 (展开)
1 有用 侯粉 2020-05-09 05:01:37
3星半作品，打3星是因为作者语法错误太多，而且句式选择太差。最大价值是简明扼要地梳理了从周世宗到宋真宗的战役。核心论点：宋朝是武力开国的政权，澶渊之盟之前，军事是宋朝的主体性格，而非11世纪后文人（如范祖禹）建构的那个自太祖登基起便以文治为主的朝代；对于世宗、太祖、太宗而言，皇帝的政治权力有赖于军事成功，而政治权力也会影响军事实力。对于宋太祖，政治和军事无法分开，他的政治成功来自于军事成功。太宗在... 3星半作品，打3星是因为作者语法错误太多，而且句式选择太差。最大价值是简明扼要地梳理了从周世宗到宋真宗的战役。核心论点：宋朝是武力开国的政权，澶渊之盟之前，军事是宋朝的主体性格，而非11世纪后文人（如范祖禹）建构的那个自太祖登基起便以文治为主的朝代；对于世宗、太祖、太宗而言，皇帝的政治权力有赖于军事成功，而政治权力也会影响军事实力。对于宋太祖，政治和军事无法分开，他的政治成功来自于军事成功。太宗在亲征灭汉后选择直接伐辽，是因为得国不正的他更需要通过胜利证明自己。其在军事上的失败导致政治危机，进而不得不采取文治，把军事与政治区分开。真宗即位后皇权稳固，才使得他有可能接受澶渊之盟（太宗是不可能搞盟约的，因为内部政治不允许）。这书最大的缺点是关键概念缺乏定义，且政治动机分析很难找到直接史料支持。 (展开)
7 有用 功夫熊猫小碗熊 2016-10-26 13:10:09
博论蛰伏二十年出书果然不同凡响。颇有过多借引西论和过度阐释弊端，但点出战争与军事—政治考虑在宋朝开国中重要意义，结合以往作品开辟一种以战争（有组织暴力）和政治合法性（文武关系、武风逐渐减退、开国君主如何保证有系统地将军队和将领脱嵌于个人权威而置于帝国制度管治下）观察中国王朝建立和崩坏循环的路径。对辽的重视也为宋朝政治军事研究所罕见，似乎一直强调辽朝存在对宋朝作为天命所归占据中原虽然构成实体和言说上... 博论蛰伏二十年出书果然不同凡响。颇有过多借引西论和过度阐释弊端，但点出战争与军事—政治考虑在宋朝开国中重要意义，结合以往作品开辟一种以战争（有组织暴力）和政治合法性（文武关系、武风逐渐减退、开国君主如何保证有系统地将军队和将领脱嵌于个人权威而置于帝国制度管治下）观察中国王朝建立和崩坏循环的路径。对辽的重视也为宋朝政治军事研究所罕见，似乎一直强调辽朝存在对宋朝作为天命所归占据中原虽然构成实体和言说上的威胁（南朝vs北朝），但辽国对中原野心并不大，边疆也早已形成相对稳定交流和对峙状态，相反宋太祖太宗在扫清南方后多次攻击北汉、侵入辽地、军队持续保持攻击态势，才迫使辽国萧太后作出主动攻击姿态，澶渊之盟既是宋代扩张结束也标志着宋代天命缺失（无法收复幽云十六州）将持续困扰宋朝大战略。 (展开)