出版社: Stanford University Press
译者: Edmund Jephcott
出版年: 2007-3-13
页数: 304
定价: USD 26.95
装帧: Paperback
ISBN: 9780804736336
内容简介 · · · · · ·
"Dialectic of Enlightenment" is undoubtedly the most influential publication of the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory. Written during the Second World War and circulated privately, it appeared in a printed edition in Amsterdam in 1947. "What we had set out to do," the authors write in the Preface, "was nothing less than to explain why humanity, instead of entering a truly hum...
"Dialectic of Enlightenment" is undoubtedly the most influential publication of the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory. Written during the Second World War and circulated privately, it appeared in a printed edition in Amsterdam in 1947. "What we had set out to do," the authors write in the Preface, "was nothing less than to explain why humanity, instead of entering a truly human state, is sinking into a new kind of barbarism." Yet the work goes far beyond a mere critique of contemporary events. Historically remote developments, indeed, the birth of Western history and of subjectivity itself out of the struggle against natural forces, as represented in myths, are connected in a wide arch to the most threatening experiences of the present. The book consists in five chapters, at first glance unconnected, together with a number of shorter notes. The various analyses concern such phenomena as the detachment of science from practical life, formalized morality, the manipulative nature of entertainment culture, and a paranoid behavioral structure, expressed in aggressive anti-Semitism, that marks the limits of enlightenment. The authors perceive a common element in these phenomena, the tendency toward self-destruction of the guiding criteria inherent in enlightenment thought from the beginning. Using historical analyses to elucidate the present, they show, against the background of a prehistory of subjectivity, why the National Socialist terror was not an aberration of modern history but was rooted deeply in the fundamental characteristics of Western civilization. Adorno and Horkheimer see the self-destruction of Western reason as grounded in a historical and fateful dialectic between the domination of external nature and society. They trace enlightenment, which split these spheres apart, back to its mythical roots. Enlightenment and myth, therefore, are not irreconcilable opposites, but dialectically mediated qualities of both real and intellectual life. "Myth is already enlightenment, and enlightenment reverts to mythology." This paradox is the fundamental thesis of the book. This new translation, based on the text in the complete edition of the works of Max Horkheimer, contains textual variants, commentary upon them, and an editorial discussion of the position of this work in the development of Critical Theory.
Dialectic of Enlightenment的创作者
· · · · · ·
-
马克斯·霍克海默 作者
作者简介 · · · · · ·
Adorno and Horkheimer see the self-destruction of Western reason as grounded in a historical and fateful dialectic between the domination of external nature and society. They trace enlightenment, which split these spheres apart, back to its mythical roots. Enlightenment and myth, therefore, are not irreconcilable opposites, but dialectically mediated qualities of both real and ...
Adorno and Horkheimer see the self-destruction of Western reason as grounded in a historical and fateful dialectic between the domination of external nature and society. They trace enlightenment, which split these spheres apart, back to its mythical roots. Enlightenment and myth, therefore, are not irreconcilable opposites, but dialectically mediated qualities of both real and intellectual life. "Myth is already enlightenment, and enlightenment reverts to mythology." This paradox is the fundamental thesis of the book.
喜欢读"Dialectic of Enlightenment"的人也喜欢 · · · · · ·
Dialectic of Enlightenment的书评 · · · · · · ( 全部 74 条 )
《启蒙辩证法》读书报告
这篇书评可能有关键情节透露
《启蒙辩证法》读书报告 一、 “辩证”的启蒙:新一轮的神话 作者开篇就提到:“就进步的思想的最一般意义而言,启蒙的根本目标就是要使人们摆脱恐惧,树立自主……其纲领是要唤醒世界,祛除神话,并用知识替代幻想。”而知识的本质“在于时间和劳动,在于对人类从未揭示过的... (展开)《启蒙辩证法》文本论证逻辑梳理(课程作业)
《启蒙辩证法》导读与知识背景补充
> 更多书评 74篇
这本书的其他版本 · · · · · · ( 全部14 )
-
上海人民出版社 (2006)8.8分 1894人读过
-
上海人民出版社 (2020)8.5分 357人读过
-
上海人民出版社 (2003)8.8分 150人读过
-
商周文化事業股份有限公司 (2008)8.7分 70人读过
以下书单推荐 · · · · · · ( 全部 )
- CUHK Cultural Studies (路德喵)
- The Reading List for “Critical Approach” (神探夏洛特二世)
- 英国传媒研究阅读书目 (Shining宁)
- 哲学思考(含佛学) (王荣欣)
- Reading list from Marco Casagrande (Iris shen)
谁读这本书? · · · · · ·
二手市场
· · · · · ·
- 在豆瓣转让 有785人想读,手里有一本闲着?
订阅关于Dialectic of Enlightenment的评论:
feed: rss 2.0
8 有用 Narrenturm 2014-03-10 02:54:08
Adorno果然够刁钻够刻薄,跑到美国把人家文化批判得渣都不剩。他说马克吐温那种蠢到无可救药的作品,却总被美国文化产业用来调戏大众。读得真高兴,我最讨厌的就是美国表面欢快实则空洞的糙文化。adorno,手动赞!
1 有用 Ion 2020-02-05 23:27:12
对照中译本看了"Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception"这一篇。culture industry这个术语大概就是由Horkheimer 和Adorno首创并在这篇文章中提出和系统研究的。法兰克福学派的文化批判理论对中国学界影响巨大,法兰克福学派的理论曾作为丛书被译介入中国学界。在中国90年代初年开始的第一波针对大众文化的集中批判中,诸如陶... 对照中译本看了"Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception"这一篇。culture industry这个术语大概就是由Horkheimer 和Adorno首创并在这篇文章中提出和系统研究的。法兰克福学派的文化批判理论对中国学界影响巨大,法兰克福学派的理论曾作为丛书被译介入中国学界。在中国90年代初年开始的第一波针对大众文化的集中批判中,诸如陶东风、尹鸿等学者发表了诸多文章,法兰克福批判理论是中国学界率先和集中使用的第一个理论范式。文化工业理论的观点主要有,文化工业中,交换价值取代了使用价值,生产出来的文化商品都是千篇一律的,具有同质性sameness。且文化工业所扮演的意识形态工作就是从上到下整合(integrate)大众,等等。 (展开)
3 有用 A 2016-01-31 06:29:32
历史进程上,人都有欲望要建构一个自为的机器,人创造概念,这些概念在大规模的传播下成为第二自然性,顺从这些就是所谓健康的体现,而反对它,反而需要超人一样的力量。一个社会越是文明,生产力越是得到解放,人的形象就越加孤独与支离破碎,人的内心也越加受到压抑。读的过程中也看到了今后像Foucault写规训与惩罚的影子
0 有用 忧伤的不老板 2019-01-03 16:40:50
难得一比
2 有用 λόγος 2019-10-18 07:47:25
上双利的西马课读的了。现在记得也只有文化工业的一些概念,但是依稀觉得当时要么读出了跟这种对《启蒙辩证法》惯常解读不同的东西,要么没读文化工业这一章。好像想起来一些,双利当时上课说的是一章附录,讲的奥德赛。
0 有用 Daphné 2024-05-11 17:57:17 广东
挺好就是我英语水平不太够😭
0 有用 Ιάννης Ξενάκης 2024-05-11 14:28:01 广东
谁骂法派我支持谁
0 有用 fff勒内 2024-03-26 11:29:12 美国
generals补intro,这次终于补完。论Odysseus还是强,self-preservation as self-renunciation(然后反转);reason as its condition and result;anti-Semitism as false projection。读完整本才能体感enlightenment-myth的关系。最后reflection/negativi... generals补intro,这次终于补完。论Odysseus还是强,self-preservation as self-renunciation(然后反转);reason as its condition and result;anti-Semitism as false projection。读完整本才能体感enlightenment-myth的关系。最后reflection/negativity as movement的预示。断章里讲人类中心史观似乎有潜力。|202201cultural industry:依然对艺术authenticity的批判潜力抱有希望;齐整的totality至少预示了资本主义新精神、媒介规训/控制社会和日常生活的诞生。德法比较前者仍然是materialist。 (展开)
0 有用 姜饼小人! 2023-11-29 13:55:47 美国
说实话并不特别喜欢… Enlightenment和myth之间的辩证关系(myth entails Enlightenment; Enlightenment, continuing the subject matters of myth, is entangled with it.) 论证得毫无必要得复杂… //尽管如此漂亮的句子还是一个接一个
0 有用 未见青山老 2023-10-28 11:29:04 山东
"They were working off a script that in its high-end version was articulated byDialectic of Enlightenment. The supposed cultural contradictions of capitalism hadn’t gotten bad enough to wreck the syst... "They were working off a script that in its high-end version was articulated byDialectic of Enlightenment. The supposed cultural contradictions of capitalism hadn’t gotten bad enough to wreck the system, but just you wait." (展开)