出版社: Oxford Paperbacks
副标题: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics
出版年: 1999-3-4
页数: 640
定价: GBP 10.99
装帧: Paperback
ISBN: 9780192861986
内容简介 · · · · · ·
In the readition of the bestselling Chaos and A Brief History of Time, here is a science book with mainstream appeal. Proponents of artificial intelligence maintain that eventually a computer will be able to do everything a human mind can do, but Oxford University Professor of Mathematics Roger Penrose explains his view that there are facets of human thinking that can never be ...
In the readition of the bestselling Chaos and A Brief History of Time, here is a science book with mainstream appeal. Proponents of artificial intelligence maintain that eventually a computer will be able to do everything a human mind can do, but Oxford University Professor of Mathematics Roger Penrose explains his view that there are facets of human thinking that can never be emulated by a machine. Drawings throughout.
Some love it, some hate it, but The Emperor's New Mind, physicist Roger Penrose's 1989 treatise attacking the foundations of strong artificial intelligence, is crucial for anyone interested in the history of thinking about AI and consciousness. Part survey of modern physics, part exploration of the philosophy of mind, the book is not for casual readers--though it's not overly technical, it rarely pauses to let the reader catch a breath. The overview of relativity and quantum theory, written by a master, is priceless and uncontroversial. The exploration of consciousness and AI, though, is generally considered as resting on shakier ground.
Penrose claims that there is an intimate, perhaps unknowable relation between quantum effects and our thinking, and ultimately derives his anti-AI stance from his proposition that some, if not all, of our thinking is non-algorithmic. Of course, these days we believe that there are other avenues to AI than traditional algorithmic programming; while he has been accused of setting up straw robots to knock down, this accusation is unfair. Little was then known about the power of neural networks and behavior-based robotics to simulate (and, some would say, produce) intelligent problem-solving behavior. Whether these tools will lead to strong AI is ultimately a question of belief, not proof, and The Emperor's New Mind offers powerful arguments useful to believer and nonbeliever alike. --Rob Lightner
作者简介 · · · · · ·
罗杰·彭罗斯
英国数学物理学家,从1973年起担任牛津大学的罗斯·波勒数学教授,是全世界公认的最博学和最有创见的科学家、思想家、哲学家。
译者简介
许明贤,1947年出生于上海,1968年清华大学无线电系毕业,之后任教于中国科技大学。目前在美攻读博士学位。
吴忠超,1946年出生于福州,1968年毕业于中国科技大学无线电系,并任教于该校。1984年在霍金教授指导下,得到剑桥大学博士学位。
喜欢读"The Emperor's New Mind"的人也喜欢的电子书 · · · · · ·
喜欢读"The Emperor's New Mind"的人也喜欢 · · · · · ·
The Emperor's New Mind的书评 · · · · · · ( 全部 48 条 )
差点忘了书里的那个故事
> 更多书评 48篇
这本书的其他版本 · · · · · · ( 全部9 )
-
湖南科学技术出版社 (2007)8.1分 2089人读过
-
湖南科学技术出版社 (2018)6.5分 111人读过
-
Oxford University Press (1989)暂无评分 11人读过
-
Oxford University Press (2016)暂无评分 6人读过
在哪儿借这本书 · · · · · ·
以下书单推荐 · · · · · · ( 全部 )
- Physics Books for Fun (夢の點滴)
- 继续 (hkstehtstark)
- 天文·宇宙 (Sisyphus)
- 第一推动力系列的原版们 (→)
- understanding the universe (karlan)
谁读这本书? · · · · · ·
二手市场
· · · · · ·
订阅关于The Emperor's New Mind的评论:
feed: rss 2.0
0 有用 zrfbyfd 2014-01-26 14:23:33
Well,到后期的argument不大严谨,估计是问题本身太难了,但是足够有趣~改天写个书评。
8 有用 feanor 2012-12-07 00:16:06
原本有趣的話題,跨學科不同知識的介紹,都被作者毫不layman-friendly的寫法變成一次非常辛苦的閱讀過程,不管他人怎樣吹捧,Penrose不適合寫科普。
3 有用 迷笛悠客 2011-01-24 00:47:49
loving and hating his long phrases...the reasoning in the mathematical proofs is sometimes hard to get, so making me feel like jumping over important logical link. But after trying reallyreally hard t... loving and hating his long phrases...the reasoning in the mathematical proofs is sometimes hard to get, so making me feel like jumping over important logical link. But after trying reallyreally hard to finally get the point, it seems to be because he skipped a lot of details. Not so easy to read, but surely highly interesting. (展开)
0 有用 それ 2021-08-22 07:08:06
Until we fully understand quantum physics processes,just alike the formation of our consciousness characterized by indeterminism and uncertainty ,it’s unlikely that we’ll be able to program computers ... Until we fully understand quantum physics processes,just alike the formation of our consciousness characterized by indeterminism and uncertainty ,it’s unlikely that we’ll be able to program computers to possess human intelligence.Read by Blinkist. (展开)
0 有用 Love Saoirse 2008-06-02 17:27:29
Interesting.
0 有用 それ 2021-08-22 07:08:06
Until we fully understand quantum physics processes,just alike the formation of our consciousness characterized by indeterminism and uncertainty ,it’s unlikely that we’ll be able to program computers ... Until we fully understand quantum physics processes,just alike the formation of our consciousness characterized by indeterminism and uncertainty ,it’s unlikely that we’ll be able to program computers to possess human intelligence.Read by Blinkist. (展开)
0 有用 Sam 2021-04-17 10:48:38
用艰涩的物理细节掩盖跑题王的本质😑
1 有用 Vermouth 2018-05-02 01:09:00
论点非常小众,基本也没有什么论据可言,都是猜测。不过很开脑洞,还蛮好玩的
0 有用 叮铃铃 2018-01-20 05:56:56
今天Roger Penrose来我们学校给讲座啊!抱着书书要签名
2 有用 [已注销] 2015-07-06 01:42:10
4-