作者:
Prasenjit Duara 出版社: University Of Chicago Press 副标题: Questioning Narratives of Modern China 出版年: 1997-1-1 页数: 286 定价: USD 24.00 装帧: Paperback ISBN: 9780226167220
Prasenjit Duara offers the first systematic account of the relationship between the nation-state, nationalism, and the concept of linear history. Focusing primarily on China and including discussion of India, Duara argues that many historians of postcolonial nation-states have adopted a linear, evolutionary history of the Enlightenment/colonial model. As a result, they have wri...
Prasenjit Duara offers the first systematic account of the relationship between the nation-state, nationalism, and the concept of linear history. Focusing primarily on China and including discussion of India, Duara argues that many historians of postcolonial nation-states have adopted a linear, evolutionary history of the Enlightenment/colonial model. As a result, they have written repressive, exclusionary, and incomplete accounts.
The backlash against such histories has resulted in a tendency to view the past as largely constructed, imagined, or invented. In this book, Duara offers a way out of the impasse between constructionism and the evolving nation; he redefines history as a series of multiple, often conflicting narratives produced simultaneously at national, local, and transnational levels. In a series of closely linked case studies, he considers such examples as the very different histories produced by Chinese nationalist reformers and partisans of popular religions, the conflicting narratives of statist nationalists and of advocates of federalism in early twentieth-century China. He demonstrates the necessity of incorporating contestation, appropriation, repression, and the return of the repressed subject into any account of the past that will be meaningful to the present. Duara demonstrates how to write histories that resist being pressed into the service of the national subject in its progress—or stalled progress—toward modernity.
作者简介
· · · · · ·
Prasenjit Duara is chair of the department of history at the University of chicago. He is the author of Culture, Power, and the State: Rural North China, 1900-1942 and Sovereignty and Authentcity: Manchukuo and the East Asian Modern.
As the subject of History, it must daily reproduce the project of recovering its national essence --to secure its transparency as the already-always of the nation space. At the same time, the Enlightenment discourse of modern civilization has made it imperative for all societies to affiliate themselves with modernity. Committing oneself to modernity and progress, however, is a commitment to the celebration of the new, the breaking of old shackles. Thus while on the one hand, nation-states glorify the ancient or eternal character of the nation, they also seek to emphasize the unprecedented nature of the nation-state, becuase it is only in this form that the people-nation has been able to realize itself as self-conscious subject of History. (查看原文)
通过批判黑格尔的线性启蒙史观来重写历史—> toward a bifurcated history, 二元概念such as tradition and modernity make little sense; “nation” 不再作为一个驱动历史前进的主体—> instead focus on the local, unofficial, fragmented, repressed momen...通过批判黑格尔的线性启蒙史观来重写历史—> toward a bifurcated history, 二元概念such as tradition and modernity make little sense; “nation” 不再作为一个驱动历史前进的主体—> instead focus on the local, unofficial, fragmented, repressed moments of history—> 意即通往后现代的解构吗？(展开)
bifurcated history
possibilities dispersed in the historical zone, when being narrated for modern nation, it comes to become a linear, progressive, teleological history.
questioning alternative schema...bifurcated history
possibilities dispersed in the historical zone, when being narrated for modern nation, it comes to become a linear, progressive, teleological history.
questioning alternative schema of nation, modernity
(展开)
He sets the tone and provides analytical and conceptual tools for other scholars. Need to return for a closer read. Current linear National History is the product of appropriation and obliteration of ...He sets the tone and provides analytical and conceptual tools for other scholars. Need to return for a closer read. Current linear National History is the product of appropriation and obliteration of alternative views and narratives of nation and community.(展开)
wizard
社会科学文献出版社2003版
月之仙者
社会科学文献出版社2003版
湖畔的花不曾开
江苏人民出版社2009版
子不语
社会科学文献出版社2003版
江海一蓑翁
江苏人民出版社2009版
哲夫成城
江苏人民出版社2009版
1 有用 Euynix 2020-07-12 03:03:04
通过批判黑格尔的线性启蒙史观来重写历史—> toward a bifurcated history, 二元概念such as tradition and modernity make little sense; “nation” 不再作为一个驱动历史前进的主体—> instead focus on the local, unofficial, fragmented, repressed momen... 通过批判黑格尔的线性启蒙史观来重写历史—> toward a bifurcated history, 二元概念such as tradition and modernity make little sense; “nation” 不再作为一个驱动历史前进的主体—> instead focus on the local, unofficial, fragmented, repressed moments of history—> 意即通往后现代的解构吗？ (展开)
1 有用 harumi 2011-03-31 18:58:54
很久以前读不懂的书 现在看起来似乎很明白。。。到底是我老了 还是变聪明了。。。
0 有用 张泡沫小姐 2013-09-01 12:00:09
所谓的bifurcate history好像只是个新瓶旧酒罢了，好的是对梁启超，康有为，汪精卫思想的解读，真是refreshing,我原来学了这么久，对自己国家的历史知道得那么少。。。。
0 有用 フ 2014-09-29 04:45:20
没什么感觉 lol
3 有用 功夫熊猫小碗熊 2016-09-11 12:24:16
可谓反历史的历史，复线多重解构史挑战单线进步同一史背后，乘文化批评和解构潮流将角力场转到言说、文化与史哲学，蚕食美中历史界工作方法与成果：时间线性消失，历史以不同言语面貌在过去现在未来间跳跃；民族国家作为政治实体与黑格尔历史目的（绝对精神）论终点消散，群体认同和文化边界软化，揭示宏大目的自我实现而消除边缘、整合破碎怀旧、融合断裂话语的过程；政治经济文化项目让位于历史言说写作话语，为当下和目的论未来... 可谓反历史的历史，复线多重解构史挑战单线进步同一史背后，乘文化批评和解构潮流将角力场转到言说、文化与史哲学，蚕食美中历史界工作方法与成果：时间线性消失，历史以不同言语面貌在过去现在未来间跳跃；民族国家作为政治实体与黑格尔历史目的（绝对精神）论终点消散，群体认同和文化边界软化，揭示宏大目的自我实现而消除边缘、整合破碎怀旧、融合断裂话语的过程；政治经济文化项目让位于历史言说写作话语，为当下和目的论未来而改造过去；不止解构我者，更揭示我者中的他者；史料用途和真实优先性让位于写作者本人阐释批评意图。总要扯上印度，然印度被完全殖民而产生的怀旧反现代反反思殖民进而批评现代化思潮，终究与中国借用传统追求集体解放进步之现代化项目相依异。对黑格尔批评本可引至绝对精神/国家与行动者关系。是有用鲶鱼，然仅止于此？ (展开)
0 有用 半人馬的Z 2024-05-18 14:19:02 美国
深邃. 確實需要反覆閱讀的一本書. 很多題目（特別第七章）也都是從這本書延伸開來，自身也是一個開拓者. Bifurcated History倒是反映出了歷史和歷史敘事本身的復調性. 也確實能看到杜贊奇對Murthy的影響. （可能也有對陳光興的影響吧）當然 這本書本身也是對中國領域的理論思辨有很大意義. 希望之後能時時重溫吧.
0 有用 梦想开小船 2024-03-20 14:47:29 北京
bifurcated history possibilities dispersed in the historical zone, when being narrated for modern nation, it comes to become a linear, progressive, teleological history. questioning alternative schema... bifurcated history possibilities dispersed in the historical zone, when being narrated for modern nation, it comes to become a linear, progressive, teleological history. questioning alternative schema of nation, modernity (展开)
1 有用 常务副momo 2023-06-19 09:32:14 美国
He sets the tone and provides analytical and conceptual tools for other scholars. Need to return for a closer read. Current linear National History is the product of appropriation and obliteration of ... He sets the tone and provides analytical and conceptual tools for other scholars. Need to return for a closer read. Current linear National History is the product of appropriation and obliteration of alternative views and narratives of nation and community. (展开)
1 有用 Yours, Miran 2023-03-07 11:58:45 美国
廣義上的中國人必讀，漢語譯本勉強差強人意，任何因為話語的政治的研究而感到焦慮和恐懼的學者都應該攬鏡自照。個人口味特別喜歡，將來會反覆閱讀！另汪氏大漢民族之父的身分，杜贊奇看得很清楚，而本朝草創以來全被漢奸標籤深深掩蓋了，這對汪氏也算是一種求仁得仁，如果他沒有以大願力親生單一純潔民族主義和歷史同化論，如果他沒有將極端達爾文主義循環三要素轉生為「中國」的綺語，那他也就不會有「恨別鳥驚心」的結局。汪氏惜... 廣義上的中國人必讀，漢語譯本勉強差強人意，任何因為話語的政治的研究而感到焦慮和恐懼的學者都應該攬鏡自照。個人口味特別喜歡，將來會反覆閱讀！另汪氏大漢民族之父的身分，杜贊奇看得很清楚，而本朝草創以來全被漢奸標籤深深掩蓋了，這對汪氏也算是一種求仁得仁，如果他沒有以大願力親生單一純潔民族主義和歷史同化論，如果他沒有將極端達爾文主義循環三要素轉生為「中國」的綺語，那他也就不會有「恨別鳥驚心」的結局。汪氏惜花之精神具有別情，故「護林之心事」不無偏屬也。超越性的康米敘事破滅之日，就是他及其他知識分子引入室的極端達爾文主義捲土重來之時。周知堂苦雨齋之「種業論」不虛：中國人「唯有坐紹其業，而收其果」，大家累世共業而事已至此，念經下筆時候總是勉為其難幫他分擔下家務。 (展开)
0 有用 王 Piu Piu 2023-02-06 01:43:58 英国
深入浅出