作者:
Carl Schmitt 出版社: University Of Chicago Press 副标题: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty 译者:
George Schwab 出版年: 2006-1-15 页数: 116 定价: USD 17.00 装帧: Paperback ISBN: 9780226738895
Written in the intense political and intellectual tumult of the early years of the Weimar Republic, "Political Theology" develops the distinctive theory of sovereignty that made Carl Schmitt one of the most significant and controversial political theorists of the twentieth century. Focusing on the relationships among political leadership, the norms of the legal order, and the s...
Written in the intense political and intellectual tumult of the early years of the Weimar Republic, "Political Theology" develops the distinctive theory of sovereignty that made Carl Schmitt one of the most significant and controversial political theorists of the twentieth century. Focusing on the relationships among political leadership, the norms of the legal order, and the state of political emergency, Schmitt argues in "Political Theology" that legal order ultimately rests upon the decisions of the sovereign. According to Schmitt, only the sovereign can meet the needs of an "exceptional" time and transcend legal order so that order can then be reestablished. Convinced that the state is governed by the ever-present possibility of conflict, Schmitt theorizes that the state exists only to maintain its integrity in order to ensure order and stability. Suggesting that all concepts of modern political thought are secularized theological concepts, Schmitt concludes "Political Theology" with a critique of liberalism and its attempt to depoliticize political thought by avoiding fundamental political decisions.
Carl Schmitt (1888–1985) was a legal theorist, political philosopher, and the author of Legality and Legitimacy, On the Three Types of Juristic Thought, Political Romanticism, Nomos of the Earth, Roman Catholicism and Political Form, Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy, and The Concept of the Political, the last available from the University of Chicago Press.
目录
· · · · · ·
Foreword Tracy B. Strong
Introduction George Schwab
Preface to the Second Edition (1934)
1. Definition of Sovereignty
2. The Problem of Sovereignty as the Problem of the Legal Form and of the Decision
3. Political Theology
· · · · · ·
(更多)
Foreword Tracy B. Strong
Introduction George Schwab
Preface to the Second Edition (1934)
1. Definition of Sovereignty
2. The Problem of Sovereignty as the Problem of the Legal Form and of the Decision
3. Political Theology
4. On the Counterrevolutionary Philosophy of the State (de Maistre, Bonald, Donoso Cortés)
Index
· · · · · · (收起)
其实核心的思路是他反复提到的either/or式的二元对立，没有任何中间地带，只有残酷的战争。这种二元对立可以是社会学与法学（神学）的对立，技术价值和形而上学的对立，资产阶级犹疑不决的生活方式和决断主义生机勃勃的生活方式的对立。依靠着这种二元对立的原型贯穿了思想史的无数线索（博丹-自然法-德国法学的社会科学化/国家理论的组织化；大革命-传统派（复辟）；天主教原罪-上帝拯救-主权 vs 路德偏移-世...其实核心的思路是他反复提到的either/or式的二元对立，没有任何中间地带，只有残酷的战争。这种二元对立可以是社会学与法学（神学）的对立，技术价值和形而上学的对立，资产阶级犹疑不决的生活方式和决断主义生机勃勃的生活方式的对立。依靠着这种二元对立的原型贯穿了思想史的无数线索（博丹-自然法-德国法学的社会科学化/国家理论的组织化；大革命-传统派（复辟）；天主教原罪-上帝拯救-主权 vs 路德偏移-世俗权威；资产阶级民主的discussion vs. 政治独裁的decision）。这种大串联的魅力是博学和历史的洞见，但是也创造出了很大的危险性，在整个链条中无法选择：一个希望过一个决断生活的人（person）是否可以拒绝一个独裁主权者政体（personalistic sovereign）？(展开)
Secularization of the Political; it is disturbing, polemical, and problematic. Need to be read with clear reference to the urgent question conceived by Schmitt about the situation of Weimer Republic i...Secularization of the Political; it is disturbing, polemical, and problematic. Need to be read with clear reference to the urgent question conceived by Schmitt about the situation of Weimer Republic in the 1920s, otherwise his reasoning would look very very embarrassing.(展开)
![[德国] 卡尔·施米特](https://img2.doubanio.com/view/personage/m/public/729820097d1c250130205cdd85689171.jpg)
卡尔·施米特 作者
沼
上海人民出版社2015版
Lowlibrarian
上海人民出版社2015版
龟龟
上海人民出版社2015版
哲夫成城
上海人民出版社2015版
云卷天舒
上海人民出版社2015版
周子愉
上海人民出版社2015版
2 有用 疯子凯 2020-04-19 18:09:28
其实核心的思路是他反复提到的either/or式的二元对立，没有任何中间地带，只有残酷的战争。这种二元对立可以是社会学与法学（神学）的对立，技术价值和形而上学的对立，资产阶级犹疑不决的生活方式和决断主义生机勃勃的生活方式的对立。依靠着这种二元对立的原型贯穿了思想史的无数线索（博丹-自然法-德国法学的社会科学化/国家理论的组织化；大革命-传统派（复辟）；天主教原罪-上帝拯救-主权 vs 路德偏移-世... 其实核心的思路是他反复提到的either/or式的二元对立，没有任何中间地带，只有残酷的战争。这种二元对立可以是社会学与法学（神学）的对立，技术价值和形而上学的对立，资产阶级犹疑不决的生活方式和决断主义生机勃勃的生活方式的对立。依靠着这种二元对立的原型贯穿了思想史的无数线索（博丹-自然法-德国法学的社会科学化/国家理论的组织化；大革命-传统派（复辟）；天主教原罪-上帝拯救-主权 vs 路德偏移-世俗权威；资产阶级民主的discussion vs. 政治独裁的decision）。这种大串联的魅力是博学和历史的洞见，但是也创造出了很大的危险性，在整个链条中无法选择：一个希望过一个决断生活的人（person）是否可以拒绝一个独裁主权者政体（personalistic sovereign）？ (展开)
2 有用 skeeter 2011-03-09 05:36:17
Secularization of the Political; it is disturbing, polemical, and problematic. Need to be read with clear reference to the urgent question conceived by Schmitt about the situation of Weimer Republic i... Secularization of the Political; it is disturbing, polemical, and problematic. Need to be read with clear reference to the urgent question conceived by Schmitt about the situation of Weimer Republic in the 1920s, otherwise his reasoning would look very very embarrassing. (展开)
0 有用 TOGOKeats 2021-12-03 08:07:05
太政治了，不够神学
0 有用 三点水 2017-09-15 02:32:18
感觉很有料却读不太进去，可能是我被Hart/Dworkin以降的英美法理限制了脑洞。还是要多读书，学习一个。
0 有用 放弃才是一切 2015-05-04 03:40:11
想要继续研究下去的对象。