Introduction to Phenomenology is an outstanding and comprehensive guide to phenomenology. Dermot Moran lucidly examines the contributions of phenomenology's nine seminal thinkers: Brentano, Husserl, Heidegger, Gadamer, Arendt, Levinas, Sartre, Merleau-Ponty and Derrida. Written in a clear and engaging style, Introduction to Phenomenology charts the course of the phenomenologica...
Introduction to Phenomenology is an outstanding and comprehensive guide to phenomenology. Dermot Moran lucidly examines the contributions of phenomenology's nine seminal thinkers: Brentano, Husserl, Heidegger, Gadamer, Arendt, Levinas, Sartre, Merleau-Ponty and Derrida. Written in a clear and engaging style, Introduction to Phenomenology charts the course of the phenomenological movement from its origins in Husserl to its transformation by Derrida. It describes the thought of Heidegger and Sartre, phenomonology's most famous thinkers, and introduces and assesses the distinctive use of phenomonology by some of its lesser known exponents, such as Levinas, Arendt and Gadamer. Throughout the book, the enormous influence of phenomenology on the course of twentieth-century philosophy is thoroughly explored. This is an indispensible introduction for all unfamiliar with this much talked about but little understood school of thought. Technical terms are explained throughout and jargon is avoided. Introduction to Phenomenology will be of interest to all students seeking a reliable introduction to a key movement in European thought.
Lack concrete examples and detailed explanation on phenomenology terms, e.g contents, object, ideal. Even the person who is familiar with Descartes, Aristotle, etc. may not quite understand what Moran...Lack concrete examples and detailed explanation on phenomenology terms, e.g contents, object, ideal. Even the person who is familiar with Descartes, Aristotle, etc. may not quite understand what Moran intends to discuss. Comparatively, Dan Zahavi’s discussion does much better, by connecting thoughts with specific theme or philosophical inquiry.(展开)
Lack concrete examples and detailed explanation on phenomenology terms, e.g contents, object, ideal. Even the person who is familiar with Descartes, Aristotle, etc. may not quite understand what Moran...Lack concrete examples and detailed explanation on phenomenology terms, e.g contents, object, ideal. Even the person who is familiar with Descartes, Aristotle, etc. may not quite understand what Moran intends to discuss. Comparatively, Dan Zahavi’s discussion does much better, by connecting thoughts with specific theme or philosophical inquiry.(展开)
第1页，导论，第二自然段引用第一版《逻辑研究》第二卷文句译文 中文译文：“思维体验和认知体验的纯粹现象学”。 英文原文： “the phenomenology of the experiences of thinking and knowing” 中文译文比英文原文乱入了“纯粹”二字，实际英文原文并无任何“pure”的字句。...
(展开)
德莫特·莫兰 作者
hildinhill
中国人民大学出版社2017版
七星之城
中国人民大学出版社2017版
0 有用 Ophelia 2023-04-17 17:05:26 重庆
终于看完了！
0 有用 Yinanaa 2020-07-08 21:55:44
可做现象学入门书。最有价值的是第一部分Brentano和在行文中不忘阐述现象学家间和向哲学传统的相互影响和取舍——近到列维纳斯对康德的取舍，梅罗庞蒂对黑格尔的取舍，远到对亚里士多德和普罗提诺、奥古斯丁的取用——现象学其实不是一门新学问。
1 有用 陈直 2021-04-25 16:50:23
读第二遍～
0 有用 阿米 2023-08-10 19:16:21 上海
Lack concrete examples and detailed explanation on phenomenology terms, e.g contents, object, ideal. Even the person who is familiar with Descartes, Aristotle, etc. may not quite understand what Moran... Lack concrete examples and detailed explanation on phenomenology terms, e.g contents, object, ideal. Even the person who is familiar with Descartes, Aristotle, etc. may not quite understand what Moran intends to discuss. Comparatively, Dan Zahavi’s discussion does much better, by connecting thoughts with specific theme or philosophical inquiry. (展开)
0 有用 阿米 2023-08-10 19:16:21 上海
Lack concrete examples and detailed explanation on phenomenology terms, e.g contents, object, ideal. Even the person who is familiar with Descartes, Aristotle, etc. may not quite understand what Moran... Lack concrete examples and detailed explanation on phenomenology terms, e.g contents, object, ideal. Even the person who is familiar with Descartes, Aristotle, etc. may not quite understand what Moran intends to discuss. Comparatively, Dan Zahavi’s discussion does much better, by connecting thoughts with specific theme or philosophical inquiry. (展开)
0 有用 Ophelia 2023-04-17 17:05:26 重庆
终于看完了！
1 有用 陈直 2021-04-25 16:50:23
读第二遍～
0 有用 Yinanaa 2020-07-08 21:55:44
可做现象学入门书。最有价值的是第一部分Brentano和在行文中不忘阐述现象学家间和向哲学传统的相互影响和取舍——近到列维纳斯对康德的取舍，梅罗庞蒂对黑格尔的取舍，远到对亚里士多德和普罗提诺、奥古斯丁的取用——现象学其实不是一门新学问。