Language analysts believe that there are no genuine philosophical problems, or that the problems of philosophy, if any, are problems of linguistic usage, or of the meaning of words. I, however, believe that there is at least one philosophical problem in which all thinking men are interested. It is the problem of cosmology: the problem of understanding the world—including ourselves, and our knowledge, as part of the world. All science is cosmology, I believe, and for me the interest of philosophy, no less than of science, lies solely in the contributions which it has made to it. (查看原文)
Language analysts regard themselves as practitioners of a method peculiar to philosophy. I think they are wrong, for I believe in the following thesis.
Philosophers are as free as others to use any method in searching for truth. There is no method peculiar to philosophy.
A second thesis which I should like to propound here is this. The central problem of epistemology has always been and still is the problem of the growth of knowledge. And the growth of knowledge can be studied best by studying the growth of scientific knowledge.
I do not think that the study of the growth of knowledge can be replaced by the study of linguistic usages, or of language systems. (查看原文)
Popper's work (in general) and this book (in particular) have been much admired by non-philosophers who wanted to have something simple and solid to rely on: and much despised and assaulted by other philosophers of science who liked to have something large ...
(展开)
云际007
中国美术学院出版社2008版
30天
中国美术学院出版社2008版
benyaya
科学出版社1986版
乌十三
Routledge2002版
1 有用 八荒 2015-05-05 12:01:36
国内搞科研的教授估计没几个懂得波普的科学逻辑论，这样的无头苍蝇能出什么样的成果也就可想而知了。
0 有用 西城杨 2013-04-16 14:27:23
科学哲学的一种论述
0 有用 无敌大肥牛 2006-09-29 15:35:40
大部分看不懂，不过内容跟《与众不同的心理学》大致相同，后者更易懂。
0 有用 梦见做梦 2007-12-04 15:11:45
波普尔的天才没得说，但行文多处概念不落实明晰，看的费劲难懂。
0 有用 yang 2011-09-24 22:45:29
有很多地方没看懂，但是看懂的地方都有点启发