Name: Advanced Macroeconomics (5/e)
ISBN: 9781260185218

作者: David Romer
出版社: McGraw-Hill Education
出版年: 2018-2-19
页数: 800
定价: USD 87.00
装帧: Hardcover
ISBN: 9781260185218

豆瓣评分

评价人数不足

评价:

内容简介 · · · · · ·

The fifth edition of Romer's Advanced Macroeconomics continues its tradition as the standard text and the starting point for graduate macroeconomics courses and helps lay the groundwork for students to begin doing research in macroeconomics and monetary economics. Romer presents the major theories concerning the central questions of macroeconomics. The theoretical analysis is s...

(展开全部)

作者简介 · · · · · ·

David Romer is the Royer Professor in Political Economy at the University of California, Berkeley, where he has been on the faculty since 1988. He is also co-director of the program in Monetary Economics at the National Bureau of Economic Research. He received his A.B. from Princeton University and his Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He has been a fellow o...

(展开全部)

目录 · · · · · ·

Introduction
Chapter 1: The Solow Growth Model
Chapter 2: Infinite-Horizon and Overlapping-Generations Models
Chapter 3: Endogenous Growth
Chapter 4: Cross-Country Income Differences
Chapter 5: Real-Business-Cycle Theory
· · · · · · (更多)

原文摘录 · · · · · ·

如果资本包括比实物资本更多的东西，或者实物资本具有的正外部性，那么实物资本的私人报酬就无法成为资本在生产中所起的重要作用的一个精确指导 (查看原文)

[已注销] 2012-04-14 21:56:05

—— 引自第20页

我来说两句

短评 · · · · · · ( 全部 2 条 )

Advanced Macroeconomics (5/e)的书评 · · · · · · ( 全部 40 条 )

热门只看本版本的评论

欢乐满人间 2010-06-24 06:34:03 McGraw-Hill/Irwin2005版

宏观经济伪科学的精品教材

优秀的高级宏观经济学教材非常少。(看看萨金特厚如板砖，难如登山的递归宏观，顿时让人心头发颤，萌生退意。)要写一本好的宏观经济学教材，一要处理好各流派之间的冲突；二要处理好数学工具的使用深度。关于第一点，罗默的书淡化冲突，强调共识，在不得不涉及到流派之争的时... (展开)

1 13回应

欢乐满人间 2010-05-22 02:24:01 上海财经大学出版社2009版

经典是怎么被毁掉的

这本书翻译的糟糕透顶！！！因为上课要求阅读的章节很多都来自这本书，偷了个懒，买来本中文翻译本的看，心想读中文速度快，可能理解的还透彻些。读的时候发现满纸中国字就是不知道说啥。难度堪比谷歌在线翻译软件的作品。后来又去亚马逊买来本原版的看，发现原来酱紫~酱... (展开)

1 7回应

focout 2010-07-24 22:55:25 McGraw-Hill/Irwin2005版

Don't understand why it is so popular

This book is not very rigrous in mathematical details, nor is it intuitive enough. I guess this is due to the fact that David is an neo-keynesian economist, maybe writing a lecture notes discussing IS-LM-BP-IA-PC is a much easier task for him. But still, ... (展开)

2 0回应