汉字革命

原文摘录   · · · · · ·  ( 全部 )

• 清末拼音方案林林总总，有的取用速记法，也有用口文假名，当然也有拉罗字母，但必须重申的是，尽管所有方案都表达了对汉字言文不符的不满，但鲜见对汉字统治的正面挑战。卢戆章在《一目了然初阶》里的表达相当接近后来以拉罗字母代替汉字的主张，但也并未提出废汉字的口号。8即便是1910年严复代表资政院提出为切音字运动“正名”，要求改切音字为“音标”的报告书也并未主张废汉字。·最接近后来汉字革命诉求的要数远在巴黎的《新世纪》同仁，主张同时废除汉字汉语，代之以万国新语（即世界语）。但清季的激进主张，直到民初都未真正撼动汉字的合法性，万国新语一派的主张与其说是彰显现代语音中心主义的威慑力，不如说是对中国文字和语言缺乏普遍性的双重焦虑。对《新世纪》激进主张提出最严正反对的当数章太炎。值得玩味的是，章太炎一面捍卫汉字，一面追求古音，在《驳中国用万国新语说》中介绍自己基于“古文篆籀的切音方案，最终成为民初读音统一会审定的注音字母方案（注音符号）的基础，于1913年正式通过…… (查看原文)

  momo 1 回复 7赞 2024-10-08 14:53:29

• The inversion is nothing short of a complete reversal of the relationship between speech and writing. First, by negating writing as sheer speech representation,Tang effectively rejects the originary Platonic position that takes writing as the evil supplement that distorts speech, corrupts memory and community, and usurps the position of power. If Derrida demonstrates, through his belabored analyses of differenceand trace, that there is no pure language and writing has always already inhabited speech, 105 then Tang takes a further step in turning writing from supplementarity to surplus In the final analysis of the"originary supplement"toward the end of Of Grammatology, Derrida makes the distinction between the natural language"words"[voixvowels" and the artificial"sound "sons, "consonants"]... (查看原文)

  Derridager 1赞 2019-12-24 13:24:53

> 全部原文摘录