出版社: University of Washington Press
副标题: Ethnic Relations and Political Power in Late Qing and Early Republican China, 1861-1928
出版年: 2000-6-23
页数: 404
定价: USD 33.00
装帧: Paperback
丛书: Studies on Ethnic Groups in China
ISBN: 9780295980409
内容简介 · · · · · ·
China's 1911-12 Revolution, which overthrew a 2000-year succession of dynasties, is thought of primarily as a change in governmental style, from imperial to republican, traditional to modern. But given that the dynasty that was overthrown—the Qing—was that of a minority ethnic group that had ruled China's Han majority for nearly three centuries, and that the revolutio...
China's 1911-12 Revolution, which overthrew a 2000-year succession of dynasties, is thought of primarily as a change in governmental style, from imperial to republican, traditional to modern. But given that the dynasty that was overthrown—the Qing—was that of a minority ethnic group that had ruled China's Han majority for nearly three centuries, and that the revolutionaries were overwhelmingly Han, to what extent was the revolution not only anti-monarchical, but also anti-Manchu?
Edward Rhoads explores this provocative and complicated question in Manchus and Han, analyzing the evolution of the Manchus from a hereditary military caste (the "banner people") to a distinct ethnic group and then detailing the interplay and dialogue between the Manchu court and Han reformers that culminated in the dramatic changes of the early 20th century.
Until now, many scholars have assumed that the Manchus had been assimilated into Han culture long before the 1911 Revolution and were no longer separate and distinguishable. But Rhoads demonstrates that in many ways Manchus remained an alien, privileged, and distinct group. Manchus and Han is a pathbreaking study that will forever change the way historians of China view the events leading to the fall of the Qing dynasty. Likewise, it will clarify for ethnologists the unique origin of the Manchus as an occupational caste and their shifting relationship with the Han, from border people to rulers to ruled.
作者简介 · · · · · ·
Edward J. M. Rhoads is professor of history at the University of Texas at Austin. He is the author of China's Republican Revolution: The Case of Kwangtung, 1895-1913.Winner of the Joseph Levenson Book Prize for Modern China, sponsored by The China and Inner Asia Council of the Association for Asian Studies
目录 · · · · · ·
Contents
Illustrations
Acknowledgments
Introduction
1 / Separate and Unequal
2 / Cixi and the “Peculiar Institution”
3 / Zaifeng and the “Manchu Ascendency”
4 / The 1911 Revolution
5 / Court and Manchus after 1911
Conclusion
Notes
Glossary
Bibliography
Index
· · · · · · (收起)
丛书信息
· · · · · ·
喜欢读"Manchus and Han"的人也喜欢 · · · · · ·
Manchus and Han的书评 · · · · · · ( 全部 10 条 )
【转】开辟满族史研究的新视野
平满汉之畛域——读路康乐的《满与汉》
【转】王志通:重识《满与汉》——兼论与“新清史”研究的关系
> 更多书评 10篇
论坛 · · · · · ·
这本书中译本是不是《满与汉:清末民初的族群关系... | 来自琥珀千秋 | 2 回应 | 2010-01-25 08:42:32 |
这本书如何啊? | 来自梧桐@饭粥天下 | 2008-09-01 15:22:53 |
这本书的其他版本 · · · · · · ( 全部3 )
-
中国人民大学出版社 (2010)8.0分 405人读过
-
University of Washington Press (2000)暂无评分 2人读过
以下书单推荐 · · · · · · ( 全部 )
- 列文森中国研究书籍奖 (benshuier)
- 新文化史;社会文化史 (by)
- 自由史与观念史 (所南心史)
- 海外中國研究Ⅲ (東寫西讀)
- 东亚文化 (王荣欣)
谁读这本书? · · · · · ·
二手市场
· · · · · ·
订阅关于Manchus and Han的评论:
feed: rss 2.0
0 有用 你才是神经病 2019-04-02 19:40:31
将满族构建认同与满汉关系问题延展到清朝最末期,与欧柯接续而又有分歧,强调满族/满人形成的政治性。最早确有皇太极溯源语言文化和神话,但盛清时更多表现为八旗分区驻防、朝廷恩宠、社会隔离、文化差异(服装、语言、不缠足)职业差异(世袭旗兵或不经科举当官)而形成军事职业共同体,基于政治权力与精英封闭循环,旗制亦逐渐和满人概念交缠而旗满一体,相应地非旗/满的汉人精英亦逐步塑造双方认同。晚清改革触动旗人利益,汉... 将满族构建认同与满汉关系问题延展到清朝最末期,与欧柯接续而又有分歧,强调满族/满人形成的政治性。最早确有皇太极溯源语言文化和神话,但盛清时更多表现为八旗分区驻防、朝廷恩宠、社会隔离、文化差异(服装、语言、不缠足)职业差异(世袭旗兵或不经科举当官)而形成军事职业共同体,基于政治权力与精英封闭循环,旗制亦逐渐和满人概念交缠而旗满一体,相应地非旗/满的汉人精英亦逐步塑造双方认同。晚清改革触动旗人利益,汉族精英多次提出旗人优待与宗亲权力过大问题,但慈禧奕匡载沣均未全心意推动清理,最终授予激进革命党口实,暴力革命中权力诉求亦夹杂排满情绪,也是在革命中满族/满人概念确立于民族/族群歧异。民国后为接管清代疆域而优待清室、五族共和,亦进一步确立满人为族之念,至PRC方以基于自我认同之划分确立狭隘的满族。 (展开)
0 有用 虾饺仙 2024-05-09 19:23:12 中国香港
清晰细致工整。史实梳理多,理论套话少,论点和问题刚开始就抛出,每个结论再点,最后大总结升华一下。基本上是回应清末满族彻底汉化的论点,从满汉关系的角度回溯了从八旗到满族的变化过程,也就是the making of 满族。好奇的是,八旗之内真的能统一认同为“满人”吗?考虑到八旗内部满蒙汉军旗的明显层级差异,在驱除鞑虏的口号下,汉军旗的人怎么回应呢…btw这个行间距真的好窄字好小,真的看得人崩溃
5 有用 北河沿井斯塔 2018-01-07 22:09:29
作者中文功底还是很深厚的,史料也很到位,关于此书看过的最好评论是狄宇宙写的。对照汉译本,就某章的个别“foreigners”被翻译成“列强”这一点,我再也不敢相信汉译的海外汉学了……
0 有用 Yours, Miran 2023-03-30 06:28:24 美国
感覺不管是不是在做民族關係,做這個時間段讀這本書都很有用,因為作者做了非常多的重要史料梳理。不過因為獄中修辭就說汪兆銘是一股沒有熱烈仇滿的清流,well,這是因為汪氏個人性格不是「直如弦」的人。因為這個就說反滿事業的指導思想的編織人 atypical,還是很 astoundingly problematic 的。還有引用老舍???這麼說的話我真能為歲月史書添磚加瓦了
0 有用 常务副momo 2023-05-28 05:00:14 美国
设问切中要害,论述扎实,坚持用经验研究推进理论探讨。将满汉关系的视角加入到辛亥革命爆发原因的讨论中,同时细致梳理了不同时期和政权下旗人如何被定义和划分以及其背后的政治文化逻辑。The 1911 Revolution broke out and succeeded not because the Qing court was resisting reforms but because it was ... 设问切中要害,论述扎实,坚持用经验研究推进理论探讨。将满汉关系的视角加入到辛亥革命爆发原因的讨论中,同时细致梳理了不同时期和政权下旗人如何被定义和划分以及其背后的政治文化逻辑。The 1911 Revolution broke out and succeeded not because the Qing court was resisting reforms but because it was not reforming fast enough to meet rising expectations for the elimination of Manchu-Han differences. (展开)
0 有用 虾饺仙 2024-05-09 19:23:12 中国香港
清晰细致工整。史实梳理多,理论套话少,论点和问题刚开始就抛出,每个结论再点,最后大总结升华一下。基本上是回应清末满族彻底汉化的论点,从满汉关系的角度回溯了从八旗到满族的变化过程,也就是the making of 满族。好奇的是,八旗之内真的能统一认同为“满人”吗?考虑到八旗内部满蒙汉军旗的明显层级差异,在驱除鞑虏的口号下,汉军旗的人怎么回应呢…btw这个行间距真的好窄字好小,真的看得人崩溃
0 有用 常务副momo 2023-05-28 05:00:14 美国
设问切中要害,论述扎实,坚持用经验研究推进理论探讨。将满汉关系的视角加入到辛亥革命爆发原因的讨论中,同时细致梳理了不同时期和政权下旗人如何被定义和划分以及其背后的政治文化逻辑。The 1911 Revolution broke out and succeeded not because the Qing court was resisting reforms but because it was ... 设问切中要害,论述扎实,坚持用经验研究推进理论探讨。将满汉关系的视角加入到辛亥革命爆发原因的讨论中,同时细致梳理了不同时期和政权下旗人如何被定义和划分以及其背后的政治文化逻辑。The 1911 Revolution broke out and succeeded not because the Qing court was resisting reforms but because it was not reforming fast enough to meet rising expectations for the elimination of Manchu-Han differences. (展开)
0 有用 Yours, Miran 2023-03-30 06:28:24 美国
感覺不管是不是在做民族關係,做這個時間段讀這本書都很有用,因為作者做了非常多的重要史料梳理。不過因為獄中修辭就說汪兆銘是一股沒有熱烈仇滿的清流,well,這是因為汪氏個人性格不是「直如弦」的人。因為這個就說反滿事業的指導思想的編織人 atypical,還是很 astoundingly problematic 的。還有引用老舍???這麼說的話我真能為歲月史書添磚加瓦了
0 有用 Joe Christmas 2022-10-14 15:29:23 中国香港
从死水微澜到正红旗下。
0 有用 Simplicio 2022-06-14 10:07:49
将满汉族群(ethnicity)关系放在同治中兴、慈禧载沣清末新政、辛亥革命、北洋军阀等大背景下,强调一直以来鲜明的满汉差异对清末民初的深远影响,如排满反满思想在清末革命运动中的显著位置,酿成革命党对旗人大肆屠杀的悲剧后果,基础史料丰富扎实,对于“旗人”、“八旗”、“满”、“汉”等概念的阐述十分有条理,叙事详尽,有时稍显繁琐。