Jacques Derrida's revolutionary theories about deconstruction, phenomenology, psychoanalysis, and structuralism, first voiced in the 1960s, forever changed the face of European and American criticism. The ideas in De la grammatologie sparked lively debates in intellectual circles that included students of literature, philosophy, and the humanities, inspiring these students to ...
Jacques Derrida's revolutionary theories about deconstruction, phenomenology, psychoanalysis, and structuralism, first voiced in the 1960s, forever changed the face of European and American criticism. The ideas in De la grammatologie sparked lively debates in intellectual circles that included students of literature, philosophy, and the humanities, inspiring these students to ask questions of their disciplines that had previously been considered improper. Thirty years later, the immense influence of Derrida's work is still igniting controversy, thanks in part to Gayatri Spivak's translation, which captures the richness and complexity of the original. This corrected edition adds a new index of the critics and philosophers cited in the text and makes one of contemporary criticism's most indispensable works even more accessible and usable.
Their movement was absolutely necessary, with a necessity which cannot be judged by any other tribunal. The privilege of the phoné does not depend upon a choice that could have been avoided. It responds to a moment of economy (let us say of the "life" of "history" or of "being as self-relationship" ). The system of "hearing (understanding)-oneself-speak" through the phonic substance—which presents itself as the nonexterior, nonmundane, therefore nonempirical or noncontingent signifier—has necessarily dominated the history of the world during an entire epoch, and has even produced the idea of the world, the idea of world-origin, that arises from the difference between the worldly and the non-wordly, the outside and the inside, ideality and nonideality, universal and nonuniversal, transcende... (查看原文)
Finally I survived Derrida...(pp.1-140) // yf said: Do you know why I assigned Derrida to you? It's very easy to talk about structure in sociology, but it's not so easy to talk about deconstruction wh...Finally I survived Derrida...(pp.1-140) // yf said: Do you know why I assigned Derrida to you? It's very easy to talk about structure in sociology, but it's not so easy to talk about deconstruction which encourages us to think where is the border of sociology? How far sociology can talk us? To what extent sociology can help us solve problems? (展开)
谢谢一些及其详尽的youtube channel陪我一起读Derrida. 对符号学的未来忧心忡忡的Derrida似乎多了一些人味儿。我想我还是会继续思考这句话的意思：“The future can only be anticipated in the form of an absolute danger. For that future world and for that within it ...谢谢一些及其详尽的youtube channel陪我一起读Derrida. 对符号学的未来忧心忡忡的Derrida似乎多了一些人味儿。我想我还是会继续思考这句话的意思：“The future can only be anticipated in the form of an absolute danger. For that future world and for that within it which will have put into question the values of sign, word, and writing, for that which guides our future anterior, there is as yet no exergue.” (展开)
Foucault: you are too difficult Derrida!
Derrida: I am not difficult for the sake of being difficult!
这辩得太可爱我不能不爱😝
What we will say next affects what we say—defer
What we say for others ->what we sa...Foucault: you are too difficult Derrida!
Derrida: I am not difficult for the sake of being difficult!
这辩得太可爱我不能不爱😝
What we will say next affects what we say—defer
What we say for others ->what we say— differ(展开)
译者和黑格尔一样，在序言里面思考序言的问题都是为自己还是想要整一篇又臭又长还怕人误解的序言开脱，所以反黑格尔应该和德勒兹一样，把在序言里面直接就说结果的做法看做是一种谦虚，一种绝不礼让的谦虚. 16页最重要一段的引文还引错了，从“所指的秩序不与.....能指同期出现”变成了“the other of signified is never contemporary...........of t...译者和黑格尔一样，在序言里面思考序言的问题都是为自己还是想要整一篇又臭又长还怕人误解的序言开脱，所以反黑格尔应该和德勒兹一样，把在序言里面直接就说结果的做法看做是一种谦虚，一种绝不礼让的谦虚. 16页最重要一段的引文还引错了，从“所指的秩序不与.....能指同期出现”变成了“the other of signified is never contemporary...........of the order of the signifier”(展开)
An unorthodox way of expressing one's appreciation for the great Jacques Derrida, perhaps, but I love this book -it is the one tome of his, along with "Specters of Marx", and this book has an amazing ...An unorthodox way of expressing one's appreciation for the great Jacques Derrida, perhaps, but I love this book -it is the one tome of his, along with "Specters of Marx", and this book has an amazing cover, depicting the Egyptian god Thoth, “the advocate of Osiris, writing on his palette” -truly tattoo-worthy.(展开)
谢谢一些及其详尽的youtube channel陪我一起读Derrida. 对符号学的未来忧心忡忡的Derrida似乎多了一些人味儿。我想我还是会继续思考这句话的意思：“The future can only be anticipated in the form of an absolute danger. For that future world and for that within it ...谢谢一些及其详尽的youtube channel陪我一起读Derrida. 对符号学的未来忧心忡忡的Derrida似乎多了一些人味儿。我想我还是会继续思考这句话的意思：“The future can only be anticipated in the form of an absolute danger. For that future world and for that within it which will have put into question the values of sign, word, and writing, for that which guides our future anterior, there is as yet no exergue.” (展开)
译者和黑格尔一样，在序言里面思考序言的问题都是为自己还是想要整一篇又臭又长还怕人误解的序言开脱，所以反黑格尔应该和德勒兹一样，把在序言里面直接就说结果的做法看做是一种谦虚，一种绝不礼让的谦虚. 16页最重要一段的引文还引错了，从“所指的秩序不与.....能指同期出现”变成了“the other of signified is never contemporary...........of t...译者和黑格尔一样，在序言里面思考序言的问题都是为自己还是想要整一篇又臭又长还怕人误解的序言开脱，所以反黑格尔应该和德勒兹一样，把在序言里面直接就说结果的做法看做是一种谦虚，一种绝不礼让的谦虚. 16页最重要一段的引文还引错了，从“所指的秩序不与.....能指同期出现”变成了“the other of signified is never contemporary...........of the order of the signifier”(展开)
序言 中译："字母产生前的文字", p1 原文："L'Ecriture avant le lettre", <<avertissement>> 英译：“Writing before the Letter", p.lxxxiv. 比较：ecriture译成”书写“较好，不是特指文字。 第一章 中译：“暴露出词汇的龌龊”,p7 原文：“dénonce la lâcheté du vo...
(展开)
《论文字学》，汪堂家译，上海译文出版社，2015年，第176页；De la grammatologie, pp. 175-176. 1 汪译：采取另一种谨慎的做法是必要的。 原文：Une autre précaution est nécessaire. C姓AI译（以下简称“AI译”）：需要另外注意一点。 硅基结构体家长寄语（以下简称“AI家...
(展开)
Comparing Barthes, who particularly stresses the writerly text and its nonlinearity, Jacques Derrida emphasizes ‘textual openness, intertextuality, and the irrelevance of distinctions between inside and outside a particular text’ (Landow, 1997: 33). For D...
(展开)
![[法国] 雅克·德里达](https://img3.doubanio.com/img/author/medium/public/1494572662.03.jpg)
雅克·德里达 作者
王麻子
上海译文出版社2005版
无属格从句
上海译文出版社2015版
哲夫成城
上海译文出版社2005版
普月
1 有用 挂角 2021-04-16 10:37:34
Finally I survived Derrida...(pp.1-140) // yf said: Do you know why I assigned Derrida to you? It's very easy to talk about structure in sociology, but it's not so easy to talk about deconstruction wh... Finally I survived Derrida...(pp.1-140) // yf said: Do you know why I assigned Derrida to you? It's very easy to talk about structure in sociology, but it's not so easy to talk about deconstruction which encourages us to think where is the border of sociology? How far sociology can talk us? To what extent sociology can help us solve problems? (展开)
0 有用 费德里科维奇 2024-02-16 10:43:33 美国
谢谢一些及其详尽的youtube channel陪我一起读Derrida. 对符号学的未来忧心忡忡的Derrida似乎多了一些人味儿。我想我还是会继续思考这句话的意思：“The future can only be anticipated in the form of an absolute danger. For that future world and for that within it ... 谢谢一些及其详尽的youtube channel陪我一起读Derrida. 对符号学的未来忧心忡忡的Derrida似乎多了一些人味儿。我想我还是会继续思考这句话的意思：“The future can only be anticipated in the form of an absolute danger. For that future world and for that within it which will have put into question the values of sign, word, and writing, for that which guides our future anterior, there is as yet no exergue.” (展开)
0 有用 田晨彤 2020-08-18 02:03:27
Foucault: you are too difficult Derrida! Derrida: I am not difficult for the sake of being difficult! 这辩得太可爱我不能不爱😝 What we will say next affects what we say—defer What we say for others ->what we sa... Foucault: you are too difficult Derrida! Derrida: I am not difficult for the sake of being difficult! 这辩得太可爱我不能不爱😝 What we will say next affects what we say—defer What we say for others ->what we say— differ (展开)
0 有用 铺着诚实的韵脚 2023-09-14 16:27:35 湖北
译者和黑格尔一样，在序言里面思考序言的问题都是为自己还是想要整一篇又臭又长还怕人误解的序言开脱，所以反黑格尔应该和德勒兹一样，把在序言里面直接就说结果的做法看做是一种谦虚，一种绝不礼让的谦虚. 16页最重要一段的引文还引错了，从“所指的秩序不与.....能指同期出现”变成了“the other of signified is never contemporary...........of t... 译者和黑格尔一样，在序言里面思考序言的问题都是为自己还是想要整一篇又臭又长还怕人误解的序言开脱，所以反黑格尔应该和德勒兹一样，把在序言里面直接就说结果的做法看做是一种谦虚，一种绝不礼让的谦虚. 16页最重要一段的引文还引错了，从“所指的秩序不与.....能指同期出现”变成了“the other of signified is never contemporary...........of the order of the signifier” (展开)
0 有用 SssSs 2021-10-26 04:41:34
An unorthodox way of expressing one's appreciation for the great Jacques Derrida, perhaps, but I love this book -it is the one tome of his, along with "Specters of Marx", and this book has an amazing ... An unorthodox way of expressing one's appreciation for the great Jacques Derrida, perhaps, but I love this book -it is the one tome of his, along with "Specters of Marx", and this book has an amazing cover, depicting the Egyptian god Thoth, “the advocate of Osiris, writing on his palette” -truly tattoo-worthy. (展开)
0 有用 费德里科维奇 2024-02-16 10:43:33 美国
谢谢一些及其详尽的youtube channel陪我一起读Derrida. 对符号学的未来忧心忡忡的Derrida似乎多了一些人味儿。我想我还是会继续思考这句话的意思：“The future can only be anticipated in the form of an absolute danger. For that future world and for that within it ... 谢谢一些及其详尽的youtube channel陪我一起读Derrida. 对符号学的未来忧心忡忡的Derrida似乎多了一些人味儿。我想我还是会继续思考这句话的意思：“The future can only be anticipated in the form of an absolute danger. For that future world and for that within it which will have put into question the values of sign, word, and writing, for that which guides our future anterior, there is as yet no exergue.” (展开)
0 有用 resonantbody 2023-11-09 07:32:13 美国
deconstruct it all!! Ronnell真不愧是Derrida的学生
0 有用 铺着诚实的韵脚 2023-09-14 16:27:35 湖北
译者和黑格尔一样，在序言里面思考序言的问题都是为自己还是想要整一篇又臭又长还怕人误解的序言开脱，所以反黑格尔应该和德勒兹一样，把在序言里面直接就说结果的做法看做是一种谦虚，一种绝不礼让的谦虚. 16页最重要一段的引文还引错了，从“所指的秩序不与.....能指同期出现”变成了“the other of signified is never contemporary...........of t... 译者和黑格尔一样，在序言里面思考序言的问题都是为自己还是想要整一篇又臭又长还怕人误解的序言开脱，所以反黑格尔应该和德勒兹一样，把在序言里面直接就说结果的做法看做是一种谦虚，一种绝不礼让的谦虚. 16页最重要一段的引文还引错了，从“所指的秩序不与.....能指同期出现”变成了“the other of signified is never contemporary...........of the order of the signifier” (展开)
0 有用 二马仕 2023-08-07 09:47:20 北京
前言还能看懂，正文就……
0 有用 灵魂治疗者 2023-03-29 15:41:52 江苏
搞定 很费头发